There could hardly be a more damning article that that one.
Agreed. Whoever wrote this did a great service by exposing this information. Someone might do well to investigate the genealogical lineage of Huonder.
So Huonder somehow picked up this reputation for being a conservative ... here:
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/society/vitus-huonder_-death-to-gαys--bishop-of-chur-retires/44975990
This is from his Wikipedia page:
Pope Benedict XVI appointed him bishop of Chur on 8 July 2007.[1] He received his episcopal consecration on 8 September 2007 from Amédée Grab, his predecessor as bishop of Chur. His tenure proved controversial to some, as he reaffirmed orthodox Catholic doctrine in strong and uncompromising terms.
Pope Francis accepted his resignation on 20 May 2019.
So if he was this great conservative, why did Bergoglio twice refuses his resignation? Bergoglio would normally insist upon the resignation of a truly conservative/Traditional bishop ... and certainly not reject it.
IMO, Huonder was being groomed and set up as a "conservative" precisely in order to infiltrate the SSPX ... just like Ratzinger was having his persona re-created as "God's Rottweiler" when he was a flaming Modernist ("heretic worse than Luther" according to Bishop Tissier). Huonder even chose
Instaurare omnia in Christo as his episcopal motto upon his consecration in 2007. So it's very possible that he's been groomed from very early on to infiltrate SSPX.
Topic: Bishop Vitus Huonder: A Genuine Friend of Catholic Tradition? (Read 5965 times)