Author Topic: BANNED over Bishop Fellay and the General Council (Read 4773 times)

Stupid Cow · « **Reply #15 on:** June 03, 2012, 05:14:46 PM »

Quote from: Stupid Cow

Quote from: Sede Catholic
Quote
...You are right Sede. I mispeled. I guess two much Milwaukeee Lite. Thats why I called myself Stupid Cow, i.e. Dumb Ox, which you think I am right?

In your post, which I quote, you have even misspelled the word "misspelled".

You are not the most edifying member of this Forum.

No wonder you favour the SSPX-Rome Deal

Um, Sede, if you followed my humor, I also deliberately mispelled Milwaukee and misused the word "two."

:tinfoil:

woops, I mean "misspelled." I gues you are right. I cant spel.

clare · « **Reply #16 on:** June 03, 2012, 05:16:16 PM »

Quote from: Sede Catholic

In your original post, you managed to make several spelling mistakes.
For example, you could not spell the following words :
Apostasy,
Prognosticators,
Sacrilegious.

Publicly.

Mithrandylan · « **Reply #17 on:** June 03, 2012, 05:20:00 PM »

I'm lol'ing. Although, the word is "omniscient."

Telesphorus · « **Reply #18 on:** June 03, 2012, 05:23:27 PM »

Quote from: wallflower

That's what I mean, I understood people being banned who were signing up specifically to do Menzingen damage control but now there are established members being banned for having a different opinion.

(I assumed you were Caminus but realize it's an assumption and may not be correct. Either way, my concern is the same.)

Caminus style is to "play dumb." Perhaps Matthew's eyes have finally been opened to that strategy, which insults our intelligence and pretends not to see what should be obvious out of rather blind subservience to the ruling clique of the SSPX.

Sede Catholic · « **Reply #19 on:** June 03, 2012, 05:27:13 PM »

wallflower, you are wrong.

It is not a silencing game.

It is about truth versus lies.

It is a matter of trying to halt the slide into the conciliar church of a large swathe of traditional Catholicism.

CathInfo should be a Castle of truth.

We do not want it knocked down with falsehoods.

Wessex · « **Reply #20 on:** June 03, 2012, 05:27:18 PM »

I like the cabaret .....

Telesphorus · « **Reply #21 on:** June 03, 2012, 05:44:25 PM »

Quote

This is what is in store for the prideful schismatics in Hell: for all eternity devils will attack you saying you can't spell, you are an idiot, you were one of those anti-Fellay rebels. The same poison dished out against public persons on a daily basis in internet trad forums wil lbe shouted to all annoyance in your ears for eternity.

This is what happens when you become too closely enmeshed with the current regime in the SSPX.

If Caminus ever seriously countered arguments made against him instead of invariably ignoring their salient points, miscasting them, falsely paraphrasing them, over and over again, he might be worth taking seriously in debate.

As it is, the degree of uncertainty Caminus insists we accept in trying to recognize anything is so great that it verges on the pyrrhonism of the modernists. There's no establishing anything except what is convenient at the time. Isn't that the reality of those who pretend the +Fellay wing has a coherent position in continuity with that of the Archbishops?

When we hear all this talk about how Vatican II is really okay textually, I start to wonder "why has the SSPX been resisting all these years?" - is there any firm principle that the SSPX stands on? It seems there isn't listening to Caminus, because I've never seen Caminus admit concretely the sort of things Archbishop Lefebvre routinely stated.

The orientation of the neo-SSPX is clear. And they've said enough. They've made enough statements to make that clear to those on the outside who don't have their minds in a fog because of too much indoctrination.

Cristera · « **Reply #22 on:** June 03, 2012, 05:49:34 PM »

Stupid Cow, I invite you to pray this novena:

Novena to Blessed John Paul II the Great: to accelerate the “operation ѕυιcιdє” of the SSPX.

O Blessed John Paul, you who so "respectfully" kissed the Koran, You, who in the "sacred forest" of Togo, leaning forward "a dried pumpkin full of water and corn flour," "prayed for the first time with the animists" who invoke the "Powers of Water"; you who praised the “deep religiosity of Luther". Thou who put Confucius, Buddha, Zoroaster and Muhammad on par with Jesus Christ; you who by love of religious freedom, pushed to the latter Catholics States to not profess the true religion as religion of state; you, you've always known how to please our "elder brothers", recognizing that "the Old Covenant has never been revoked," help your traditionalists brothers so they can get the "full reconciliation" and “May they all be one”.
O Blessed John Paul, You who suffered so much with the fundamentalists Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop de Castro Mayer who refused to you the title of "Good Shepherd", intercede with the God of the modernists and with the UN consciousness of humanity, and give strength to your faithful successor, Benedict, who fortunately has glorified you, that he may succeed "to break down obstinacy and narrowness" of the SSPX, "to make room for what is positive and retrievable for all.”

Oh Blessed John Paul, may Benedict persevere faithfully in your teaching corrupted with heresies, to "confirm his brothers" with zeal, without abandoning "the compass of the Church for the XXI century": the "Vatican II ", may he keep the post-conciliar magisterium of the Popes because “The Church’s teaching authority cannot be frozen in the year 1962 – this must be quite clear to the Society”.

Thus the Church may be the sacrament of the globalist peace.

O Blessed John Paul, fortify Bishop Fellay for illuminate the skeptics who doubt that the SSPX has obtained, by its millions of rosaries, what had been requested. May these "men of little faith" understand that asking for the social kingship of Christ and achieving "healthy secularity" is the same thing. That request for "the Tridentine Mass to be reinstated in his rights" and get an "extraordinary rite" Mass is the same thing. That request for the withdrawal and obtain the lifting of the excommunication they have always contested, it is the same thing.

O Blessed John Paul, help the priests and faithful to always blindly trust the SSPX’s superior. May Bishop Fellay persuade them that in Rome things have changed, Benedict XVI didn’t want Assisi III and in short, help them to trust this pope who, through diplomacy does things gravely contrary to the faith, but he does not want them, he is prepared to do evil and then work better for the glory of God, the good of the Church and the salvation of souls ...

Oh Blessed John Paul that the completely unrealistic claim of archbishop Lefebvre ends forever, because "Rome never retracts" That the SSPX accept to be free in a free church.

The happy ending is coming because if "Rome denies the principle of no contradiction", today is no longer alone.

Blessed John Paul, hurry up the day of the beautiful and sweet "deal" of those who "disagree" and give us peace and Kisses. Shalom!

Stupid Cow · « **Reply #23 on:** June 03, 2012, 06:08:04 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote
This is what is in store for the prideful schismatics in Hell: for all eternity devils will attack you saying you can't spell, you are an idiot, you were one of those anti-Fellay rebels. The same poison dished out against public persons on a daily basis in internet trad forums wil lbe shouted to all annoyance in your ears for eternity.

This is what happens when you become too closely enmeshed with the current regime in the SSPX.

If Caminus ever seriously countered arguments made against him instead of invariably ignoring their salient points, miscasting them, falsely paraphrasing them, over and over again, he might be worth taking seriously in debate.

As it is, the degree of uncertainty Caminus insists we accept in trying to recognize anything is so great that it verges on the pyrrhonism of the modernists. There's no establishing anything accept what is convenient at the time. Isn't that the reality of those who pretend the +Fellay wing has a coherent position in continuity with that of the Archbishops?

When we hear all this talk about how Vatican II is really okay textually, I start to wonder "why has the SSPX been resisting all these years?" - is there any firm principle that the SSPX stands on? It seems there isn't listening to Caminus, because I've never seen Caminus admit concretely the sort of things Archbishop Lefebvre routinely stated.

The orientation of the neo-SSPX is clear. And they've said enough. They've made enough statements to make that clear to those on the outside who don't have their minds in a fog because of too much indoctrination.

Um, who is Caminus???

:confused1: :wink:

CatholicInfo Stichomythia Anyone?? :argue:

AF = anti-Fellay
FD = Fellay defender

AF - But Ite ad Thomam you are clearly no Saint Thomas

FD - I agree. Compared to him, I am a Dumb Ass

AF - But you seriously misuse the Thomistic format

FD - So you say--see PART TWO--Magister Matt

AF - thus you show yourself truely a modernist

FD - liberal, Fellayite, heretic...add it to your list

AF - you just come here to annoy us here

FD - no, just away from schism, I try to help steer.

AF - you can't even spell

FD - but unlike libel it won't send me to hell

AF- Ite ad Thomam, Stupid Cow, you are truely a Stupid Cow

FD - in the spirit of St. Thomas before that praise I bow

AF - ban him Matthew he is confusing people to here sent

FD - but thats hypocrisy to ban a mere voice of dissent

AF - aw, shut up, you are annoying really

FD - then dont read or respond to the thread silly

AF - ban this Fellayite Matt

FD - that will just ruin open discussion in the CatholicInfo format

AF - but are you deaf to the Letter of 3??

FD - what letter of 3? thats meant for privacy

AF- whatever, its out there, listen to the 3

FD - when have the 3 intended me their private letter to see?

AF - how can you be for communion with the conciliar Vatican?

FD - of Archbishop Lefebvre, that is a serious spin!

:cheers:

Stupid Cow · « **Reply #24 on:** June 03, 2012, 06:08:37 PM »

Quote from: Cristera

Stupid Cow, I invite you to pray this novena:

Novena to Blessed John Paul II the Great: to accelerate the “operation ѕυιcιdє” of the SSPX.

O Blessed John Paul, you who so "respectfully" kissed the Koran, You, who in the "sacred forest" of Togo, leaning forward "a dried pumpkin full of water and corn flour," "prayed for the first time with the animists" who invoke the "Powers of Water"; you who praised the “deep religiosity of Luther". Thou who put Confucius, Buddha, Zoroaster and Muhammad on par with Jesus Christ; you who by love of religious freedom, pushed to the latter Catholics States to not profess the true religion as religion of state; you, you've always known how to please our "elder brothers", recognizing that "the Old Covenant has never been revoked," help your traditionalists brothers so they can get the "full reconciliation" and “May they all be one”.
O Blessed John Paul, You who suffered so much with the fundamentalists Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop de Castro Mayer who refused to you the title of "Good Shepherd", intercede with the God of the modernists and with the UN consciousness of humanity, and give strength to your faithful successor, Benedict, who fortunately has glorified you, that he may succeed "to break down obstinacy and narrowness" of the SSPX, "to make room for what is positive and retrievable for all.”

Oh Blessed John Paul, may Benedict persevere faithfully in your teaching corrupted with heresies, to "confirm his brothers" with zeal, without abandoning "the compass of the Church for the XXI century": the "Vatican II ", may he keep the post-conciliar magisterium of the Popes because “The Church’s teaching authority cannot be frozen in the year 1962 – this must be quite clear to the Society”.

Thus the Church may be the sacrament of the globalist peace.

O Blessed John Paul, fortify Bishop Fellay for illuminate the skeptics who doubt that the SSPX has obtained, by its millions of rosaries, what had been requested. May these "men of little faith" understand that asking for the social kingship of Christ and achieving "healthy secularity" is the same thing. That request for "the Tridentine Mass to be reinstated in his rights" and get an "extraordinary rite" Mass is the same thing. That request for the withdrawal and obtain the lifting of the excommunication they have always contested, it is the same thing.

O Blessed John Paul, help the priests and faithful to always blindly trust the SSPX’s superior. May Bishop Fellay persuade them that in Rome things have changed, Benedict XVI didn’t want Assisi III and in short, help them to trust this pope who, through diplomacy does things gravely contrary to the faith, but he does not want them, he is prepared to do evil and then work better for the glory of God, the good of the Church and the salvation of souls ...

Oh Blessed John Paul that the completely unrealistic claim of archbishop Lefebvre ends forever, because "Rome never retracts" That the SSPX accept to be free in a free church.

The happy ending is coming because if "Rome denies the principle of no contradiction", today is no longer alone.

Blessed John Paul, hurry up the day of the beautiful and sweet "deal" of those who "disagree" and give us peace and Kisses. Shalom!

I appreciate your SATIRE.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #25 on:** June 03, 2012, 06:14:56 PM »

Quote from: wallflower

Not crazy about your reaction Caminus but I get it. I don't understand how we can go from one extreme of such loose moderation to the other extreme of practical dictatorship. I understood when the letters broke there were people signing up as moles, but longtime members who mostly agree but simply aren't indignant enough? Now we're playing the same silencing game they are.

Caminus not only was a dogmatic Fellay supporter, but he also was rude and arrogant. A ban may be just what he needs to give him a dose of humility.

Mithrandylan · « **Reply #26 on:** June 03, 2012, 06:19:11 PM »

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus

Quote from: wallflower
Not crazy about your reaction Caminus but I get it. I don't understand how we can go from one extreme of such loose moderation to the other extreme of practical dictatorship. I understood when the letters broke there were people signing up as moles, but longtime members who mostly agree but simply aren't indignant enough? Now we're playing the same silencing game they are.

Caminus not only was a dogmatic Fellay supporter, but he also was rude and arrogant. A ban may be just what he needs to give him a dose of humility.

As an observer, rude and arrogant is something all internet forums tend towards, and this one is no exception-- rudeness and arrogance is something a lot of posters on here are privy to, even habitually. Basically I'm saying rudeness and arrogance definitely isn't why he was banned. At least, not if I assume Matthew to be logically consistent, which I do.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #27 on:** June 03, 2012, 06:21:08 PM »

I know Caminus wasn't banned for that. I'm just saying maybe a ban would do him some good.

He went on a rampage several times in the past.

wallflower · « **Reply #28 on:** June 03, 2012, 06:26:59 PM »

Quote from: Mithrandylan

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
Quote from: wallflower
Not crazy about your reaction Caminus but I get it. I don't understand how we can go from one extreme of such loose moderation to the other extreme of practical dictatorship. I understood when the letters broke there were people signing up as moles, but longtime members who mostly agree but simply aren't indignant enough? Now we're playing the same silencing game they are.

Caminus not only was a dogmatic Fellay supporter, but he also was rude and arrogant. A ban may be just what he needs to give him a dose of humility.

As an observer, rude and arrogant is something all internet forums tend towards, and this one is no exception-- rudeness and arrogance is something a lot of posters on here are privy to, even habitually. Basically I'm saying rudeness and arrogance definitely isn't why he was banned. At least, not if I assume Matthew to be logically consistent, which I do.

Haha that's what I was going to say. If rude and arrogant were a reason, a lot of us should be gone a loooooong time ago.

SS I saw Caminus say he wasn't for a deal if it involved compromise. I'd say that's the bottom line for most people here. The difference lies in what we think we should do or say in the meantime until we find out more.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #29 on:** June 03, 2012, 06:33:06 PM »

Quote from: wallflower

SS I saw Caminus say he wasn't for a deal if it involved compromise. I'd say that's the bottom line for most people here. The difference lies in what we think we should do or say in the meantime until we find out more.

Fellay has shown in his own words that he has compromised on his position on Vatican II. Not to mention his extreme ignorance on the Jews.

As for being rude and arrogant, I agree that someone can't be banned just for that. I myself have been arrogant before. What I was getting at is Caminus was nearly always that way. He went on uncharitable rampages and appeared to be on the verge of another one.