(Sorry. That didn't format well and I can't modify the post :/)
What if they were preschoolers? Would that make a difference?
Teacher: "Hey,Johnny, you get to help the doctors today!
Johnny: REALLY? Oh boy! I want to help the doctor!
--Johnny is led into the doctor's office.
Johnny: Neat! What do I get to do?
Doctor: Just lie down here.
Johnny: Doctor, what is that knife?
They cut screaming Johnny open with no anesthesia and take out his kidney.
Johnny just helped create a "medical miracle".
Now Johnny is injected into people round the world.
Will you have Johnny injected into you?
Don't worry, you can always choose the shot that doesn't actually contain Johnny.
They only tested on Johnny for your shot.
So it's remote.
They need hundreds of Johnnies and Susies (although boys are preferred) to satisfy demand.
Supply and demand.
That's what drives this industry.
Fresh specimens. Heart beating. Never frozen.
I feel like we are living in nαzι Germany and everyone will one day say, "Gosh, we just didn't know." ::shrug::
I'm not sure I understand the "moral licety" of these so-called "ναccιnєs" derived from human sacrifice.
Many are saying the participation is soooooo remote that it's okay.
Well, I am seeing more information come out that people may not be aware of and that for me at least calls these arguments into question.
Anyway, I feel I must share this so everyone can make an informed decision.
Many think that the cell lines are from one aborted baby back in the 1960's.
I've shared the video of the ναccιnє creator testifying that 100's of babies are murdered to create the so-called "immortal" cell lines as well as other organ parts for testing use.
Plus the cell lines are not "immortal" actually but have to be "refreshed" (ugh) from time to time.
Meaning a fresh kill for fresh human cells is needed and as far as I know that was last done in 2015 (although there could be more unreported of course).
See here for more on the CHILD SACRIFICE done in 2015:
This quote from the article describes the strict criteria used for selecting the best human candidate for sacrifice and his or her parentage going back 3 generations...
Before the study, we made strict and comprehensive inclusion criteria in order to guarantee a high quality cell strain: 1) gestational age 2 to 4 months; 2) induction of labor with the water bag method; 3) the parents career should not involve contact with chemicals and radiation; 4) both parents are in good health without neoplastic and genetic diseases, and with no history of human tissue or organ transplantation in the families traced for 3 generations; and 5) no infectious diseases. The tissues from the freshly aborted fetuses were immєdιαtely sent to the laboratory for the preparation of the cells.“
The ‘water bag method’ is done to assure that the fetus is born alive and therefore can be transported fresh.
Dear God have mercy on us.
It's akin to the Aztecs removing the beating heart of their human sacrifice!
Bishop Athansius Schneider made it clear that baby parts injected into humans is a kind of cannibalism.
However, many say if the poor murdered child's parts aren't actually in the ναccιnє but only used for testing purposes (pfιzєr and mσdernα) that makes it more remote and we can rest easy.
Below is an article that calls that into question and I've shared my own thoughts as well. Since I'm not a moral theologian I'm open to hearing any counter arguments of course.
CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnє and HEK293: Testing and Production are Ethically Equalhttps://cogforlife.org/C
Now Catholics are using the following 3 criteria for the licit use of these ναccιnєs. My comments in red:
The Pontifical Academy for Life in 2005, and three years later in 2008 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in its “Instruction Dignitas Personae on Certain Bioethical Questions,” provided guidelines for Catholics on the permissibility of receiving ναccιnєs whose origins are connected with cells coming from an aborted child. Such ναccιnєs were deemed morally illicit, but their use is morally licit in certain situations because the patient’s use is only “remote cooperation in evil.” It is not, after all, the fault of the patient that researchers, industries, and government provide no alternative.
Permission for using unethically produced ναccιnєs comes with obligations, however. Use is only licit if:
1) the need to protect individuals and populations is grave,
Nope. The incredibly high survival rate (over 99%) does not warrant a grave need whatsoever. Our natural immune system is proven more effective than the shot.
Truly, the benefits do not outweigh the risks!
pfιzєr and mσdernα do not even make the claim that the "ναccιnєs" (gene editing therapies) will prevent infection or transmission.
This idea that you have to get shot to protect others is a complete LIE!
Does the experimental stop infection?
Does the "vax" stop transmission?
The claim that if a certain percentage of people take it there will be herd immunity is a LIE!
2) there is no alternative,
Nope. Ivermectin, Hydroxychloriquin, Vit C and D, Zinc etc. are proven to be even more effective.
This information is getting censured. Why?? Who benefits if people aren't able to utilize alternatives?
3) one continues to reject the evil of abortion and the use of aborted children in research.
How can you say that you reject the evil of scientific experiments for research when you are driving demand?
Would it make a difference if the child were older? Are preschoolers worth more than babies?
If preschoolers were being murdered to create ναccιnєs would our response be any different?
Susie: "Teacher, where did Johnny go?"
Teacher: "Oh Susie, Johnny went to help the doctors today."
Susie: "Will he be back tomorrow?"
Teacher: "No Susie, Johnny has given up his life to save other people's lives!"
I mean if Johnny was cut open and his kidney was removed while he was still alive and his heart was beating and he was given no anesthesia would you have anything to do with it?
I mean it would only be for testing purposes.
Johnny's kidney cells would only be tested on, they wouldn't actually end up in the final product.
But in reality, Johnny and Susie and Jimmy and 100's of his classmates are needed to create enough "tissue" for just one ναccιnє study.
There is no reason to take the "shot" (which is not a ναccιnє but an operating device for DNA altering gene therapy) and is not claimed to prevent infection or transmission.
The only way to stop the continued human sacrifice of babies for scientific experiments is if we all refuse to take these shots.
If you already took one shot don't take another one! There are many more to come.
Keep little Johnny in mind when they refuse service to you. When you can't fly on a plane or buy or sell.
It will be hard but Dear God in Heaven help us if we don't draw the line somewhere!
How will you sleep at night?
And keep in mind that the goal of the ɠƖobaƖısts is
Connecting you to the Internet of Things!
I will send more info on that nightmare to come.
And organ harvesting isn't just for babies and preschoolers...
Plenty of adult slaves in Chıną and elsewhere are being sacrificed for their organs already.
St Joseph, Terror of Demons, pray for us!