9
« Last post by Ladislaus on Today at 02:48:29 PM »
Although he doesn't use it in this video, Witsit can employ and has employed the same (somewhat dihonest) debating style against the Globers that they use against the FEs (such as when Non-Professor Dave went after David Weiss). It was also the same style some atheists used against the Kolbe Center. Weiss (and Hugh Owen) didn't know how to handle that debating style, which is performed rapid-fire, where you spew out all your points so quickly, while assuming them to be true unless refuted, so that your opponent doesn't have time to refute each one. You make 20 assertions in a 30-60 second blast, and then your opponent does not have the opportunity to refute the 20 assertions in the 60 seconds (or whatever) allotted to him . Only way to combat that style of debate is to point out what they're doing, gratuitously deny all the gratuitous assertions made against you, and then force the debate down to point by point. I debated through University so I knew how "debate" was evolving in that direction, switched to a different form of debate "Lincoln-Douglas style", but that too started to go down that path, and so I quit. But it's great to sick Witsit on the Globers who try to use that style of debate, because he can mop up the floor with them, while not only negating their tactics but also turning them against them. I'd love to see Witsit take down Non-Professor Dave. Very easy to do, since the guy is dumb, but he employs that style to make it appear as thoug he's defeated people.
Recent Posts