Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 20
1
Well, truth matters. Not only the Catechism, but everything that is truth is of our interest.

If God cared enough to put some cosmology in the book of Genesis, it means that it has some importance.

It seems to me that to imagine that we are on a blue ball that floats on a endless black space makes us distant from God. On the other hand, if we believe that the world has some kind of roof (the firmament) and that Our Lord and Our Lady and all the saints and angels are watching us, it somehow makes us more aware of God. It does to me anyway.

Of course that are many saints who did not bother to investigate if the Earth was round or flat, and they are in Heaven anyway.

If it works for you, it is just as good. But other people might benefit from this kind of knowledge. It has certainly been good to me to think about this kind of thing.
So we can agree that if a vast amazing discoverable universe makes me feel closer to God's Awesomeness and a flat earth with the Saints looking at us like a snow globe makes you feel God's Awesomeness, then it doesn't really matter which one is right.  Only God knows that, and as long as we are contemplating God. All is good.

But now we have relativism.  Now what?


2
So what are those pictures of?  Are you implying because his software couldn't track properly it is faked?  The way I think this photography works is that it takes many snapshots in a time period and then those images are combined together and rendered to create the photo you see.  Granted I am guessing.

It is also could be that shutter on the camera has to stay open for a lengthy amount of time to capture the image.  The computer is just used to make the photo more crisp from all the shaking of the camera. Again I am guessing.

Why does Saturn appear like a globe and Earth is not a globe?  Please direct me to a FE model that shows how the stars planets and all hang in the sky in relation to this flat earth.  Are you implying that we are in like a snow globe?  Doesn't that put limitations on God?  Why can't God create a vast Universe for us to discover?  I really don't know why I bother.  I mean really the fact people like to argue these things is silly.  God isn't going to say oh you thought my Universe is (fill in the blank), you are going to hell.  You need to believe in God and follow his rules.  It is just that simple.  Science is just what humans do to figure out what God already put into place.

Well, truth matters. Not only the Catechism, but everything that is truth is of our interest.

If God cared enough to put some cosmology in the book of Genesis, it means that it has some importance.

It seems to me that to imagine that we are on a blue ball that floats on a endless black space makes us distant from God. On the other hand, if we believe that the world has some kind of roof (the firmament) and that Our Lord and Our Lady and all the saints and angels are watching us, it somehow makes us more aware of God. It does to me anyway.

Of course that are many saints who did not bother to investigate if the Earth was round or flat, and they are in Heaven anyway.

If it works for you, it is just as good. But other people might benefit from this kind of knowledge. It has certainly been good to me to think about this kind of thing.
3
Today's news brings up gross injustice.  This man, Robert Pickton, should have had the DP.  He killed numerous people (confessed to 49.they could only prove six from the remains ID'd) and fed their bodies to his pigs. Reading initial reports back when, he made sausage etc and had barbeques for people.

Canada has banned consecutive sentences and now this SOB is eligible for parole...even though he expresses no remorse.
P.S.  This man is worth millions from family holdings.  Does money talk?

https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/metro-vancouver-mayors-robert-pickton-not-get-parole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pickton

4
Guessing doesn't help. Condemn it if you know what it is.
5
Not in the 1970s they couldn't, and they also couldn't produce technology required to got to the moon in the 1960s either ... so the faked the moon landing.  Just remember what kinds of junk cars people were driving in the 1960s and 1970s.

I worked at NASA and often participated in radiation/temperature testing of electronic components, and even with today's technology, 90% of the tech they claimed was resistant to radiation and extreme temperatures failed the tests miserably, and this was in the early 2000s, not in the 1970s.

And this is to say nothing of the fact that it's the height of absurdity to pretend that Voyager can beam meaningful signals back to earth using a 23 watt radio ... from allegedly 24 billion miles away.  That signal would be so dispersed over those distances that it could not contain any meaningful data (similar to the absurd claim that Webb is beaming high-definition data from a million miles away).  In real practice, the higher bandwidth you get, the more concentrated the signal has to be and the more power you need to send it.  If we could beam high definition data across millions of miles, cell phone companies would have gotten rid of the cell towers they have to build every mile or two a LONG time ago, to say nothing of the absurdity of hitting the target with a high bandwidth signal from a million miles that would be so tiny as to be imperceptible ... WHILE the earth is allegedly rotating at (an average of) 700 MPH AND revolving around the sun at over 6,000 MPH.  You'd be a great shot if you could hit something the size of a jar lid from 100 yards away.  Now move it to a mile away, and then to 1,000 miles ... and you're not even close to the proportions we're talking about from million miles away.  And now put the target into motion at 6,000 MPH.

You recently had a company set a record for high-bandwidth transmission at about 230 miles (across the Mediterranean), and they had to use line of sight microwave signals, since you need a very concentrated (and therefore line of sight) beam to carry high-bandwidth data.  Now try to send high-bandwidth data over a MILLION miles.  To get high bandwith, you need a concentrated, tight, and therefore line of sight signal ... and I'm sure we're getting that from Webb at about a million miles away, as the earth rotates 700MPH and flies around the sun at 6000MPH.  Suuure.  Of course, on a side note, at 230 miles (with the aforementioned microwave signal across the Mediterrean), it couldn't have been line of sight on a globe, since the target (150 foot towers) would have been obscured by 8 miles of curvature bulge.

Back in the day when we hard our rabbit-ear antennas, and then even the small dishes, to get a decent TV signal from most stations, you had to point the in just the right direction and just at the right angle to have some stations come in ... and that's when the transmitters were about 20 miles away, much less 24 billion.

Not to nitpick, but viewers almost never use "dishes" for terrestrial TV reception, those are just for satellites.  I say "almost" because there is one type of TV antenna, a UHF parabolic reflector, which is sometimes used by people in remote areas to pick up stations from 80-120 miles away (I have one):




They are 6 to 7 feet tall, and operate by concentrating the TV signal into a center point, which is then reflected onto a small grid, and then reflected back onto the antenna itself, which in the picture above (not my dish, but one similar to it) consists of two things that look like bow ties.  They are also sometimes used by cable TV companies (which is where mine came from).  You can even envelop the "ribs" with chicken wire cut to size and then shaped and fastened onto the frame (makes the dish very heavy!).

Full-power TV signals typically get about 60 miles out from the transmitter, with the area from 60 to 80+ miles being a "fringe area", and anything further out from that being just the "luck of the draw".  The maximum, under normal conditions, that a TV signal can get out, is about 120 miles.  Freak atmospheric conditions can cause signals to get out hundreds of miles beyond that, just the other morning, I was getting random signals (with another antenna, not the dish) from 300-400 miles away.
6
Female, but I believe certain crimes deserve DP as their consequence.  There was a time when any man discovered to be practicing fαɢɢօtry or anyone guilty of the sɛҳuąƖ abuse of children would be put to death.  If the state didn’t impose the sentence, his fellow prisoners would set matters to rights.  
7

So what are those pictures of?  Are you implying because his software couldn't track properly it is faked?  The way I think this photography works is that it takes many snapshots in a time period and then those images are combined together and rendered to create the photo you see.  Granted I am guessing.

It is also could be that shutter on the camera has to stay open for a lengthy amount of time to capture the image.  The computer is just used to make the photo more crisp from all the shaking of the camera. Again I am guessing.

Why does Saturn appear like a globe and Earth is not a globe?  Please direct me to a FE model that shows how the stars planets and all hang in the sky in relation to this flat earth.  Are you implying that we are in like a snow globe?  Doesn't that put limitations on God?  Why can't God create a vast Universe for us to discover?  I really don't know why I bother.  I mean really the fact people like to argue these things is silly.  God isn't going to say oh you thought my Universe is (fill in the blank), you are going to hell.  You need to believe in God and follow his rules.  It is just that simple.  Science is just what humans do to figure out what God already put into place.
8
Non-existence exists = antimatter?  
Do negative numbers exist?
9
Politics and World Leaders / Re: Is it Boeing or…
« Last post by Mark 79 on Today at 10:00:01 AM »
Boeing 767 Loses Emergency Slide After Departing From New York City
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/boeing-767-loses-emergency-slide-after-departing-new-york-city
10
I think there have been some cases of Catholic couples never engaging in marital relations at least for some years. It would be interesting to know the church's teaching on this. It would seem vain to marry with no intent or attempt to have children, but I think it can be a means to help each other get to heaven in a lawful manner and without scandal. I'd still avoid sleeping in the same bed if there is no intention of producing children. I've heard a priest say that a married couple can leave each other (not divorce) and become religious as long as they agree on that matter, and have no hindering obligations such as raising children.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 20