Reportedly the Starlink satellites are the size of an office desk and are allegedly between 200 and 300 miles away, and have no exterior illumination.  So how can you see something the size of an office desk from 200+ miles away at night when it has no source of light?  Maybe they're not what Elon et al. claim they are.  Have you ever thought about that?

Supposedly they reflect the light of the sun.  I've never seen them, but there is video of them traveling in tandem, like a train going through the sky:



Light such as this being 200-300 miles away isn't so outlandish.  The red blinking lights you see on TV towers, which can be 2000 feet tall, are about the size of a shoebox (albeit with internal illumination) and can easily be seen at night 10 or more miles away, if you have a straight shot from your location to the transmitter.  An office desk is several times larger than one of these lights (think office desk versus shoebox).

I think you have an interesting point.  The society has become effeminate. But is it because of the women (taking over), the men (letting them), both, or something else?  Maybe if we reestablish a good Catholic society these things would go back to the way God intended.  For now I guess we just have to muddle through this world with our strong Catholic principles.

It was an orchestrated plan by the Jiu's and haters of Christian Societies.  It was a direct attack on the family unit because they knew that was the backbone of society. 

They started by pulling men away from their homes and into industrial and factory type jobs instead of working at their homesteads and making productive property and family businesses, etc.

Then with the orchestrated World Wars they started to get women into the workforce and pulled them away from the home.  Now with jobs co-ed there would always be occasions of sin and adultery which breaks family bonds.

Then the current "EdJєωcation" system was set up and established to get the kids out of the home and brainwash kids with the anti-Christian garbage you see today.

It was a gradual and purposeful dismantling of society, piecemeal to break family bonds so they can be owned by the state.  I believe it will be fixed someday with the Catholic Restoration but when that happens is unknown.

Eleison Comments DCCCLXXIV (874)

The Newsociety Superior General, Fr. Pagliarani, raised this question at his Conference in Econe on September 8 last year, but if the Newsociety absolutely wants to be loved and recognised by freemasonic and modernist Rome, then such a question simply cannot be raised. Which is why he took a clear position – the new-rite Consecrations are valid. 

THIS^^^

He sounds really close to the SSPX, or at least the NeoSSPX, but just hasn't quite got there. Understandably in my opinion. It takes time to carefully discern the truth, or you are liable to either give it all up and lose the faith or dive into some sort of extremism.

I'm really enjoying Vol 1 The Ridgefield Letters from the Bp. Williamson Letters from the Rector series. Lots of good bits of History in the somewhat early years of the SSPX, including Rome's thoughts and arguments against the SSPX at the time, and why the SSPX does what it does.

I can never understand how there can be an annulment between two Catholics if there are children with their marriage?     

What does the Bible say about divorce and remarried? 

Whether or not there are children involved doesn’t have anything to do with annulment. 

An annulment is simply stating that the sacrament of matrimony was never validly confected. 

yes, the conciliar church dispenses annulments like candy, but pre-Vatican 2 there could certainly be cases where marriages were annulled, even with children involved.

an annulment is not a divorce, even if the new church might treat it this way.