Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 20
1
I don't think it's traditional to separate the message from the recipient. Those claiming to receive messages from Heaven have always been heavily scrutinized. Why would a message about Tradition be delivered to a N.O. nun?

This 👆👆👆
2
Many of these issues point to women's suffrage here in the US.  Once women had the right to vote here in the US, everything went downhill from there, including the election of politicians who are anti-death penalty.

Women tend to be more solidly anti-death penalty than men.  The logic follows thus:  All murder is killing, but not all killing is murder.  I have had quite few liberal Catholics tell me, "The death penalty is murder."  Not true!  The definition of murder is, "The intentional taking of an innocent human life."  The far majority of the death row inmates are not innocent, and should the truth be known, many of those on death row who might be innocent of their alleged crimes, should be put to death for the crimes which they were never charged for.     

I remember the Clinton years, and quite a few women told me they voted for Billy Boy because he was cute.  This is insane, but when we look at the numbers of women in America who voted Clinton, there is probably a lot of truth in this.  He is a smooth talker and he looks good, let us vote for him.   
3
I don't think it's traditional to separate the message from the recipient. Those claiming to receive messages from Heaven have always been heavily scrutinized. Why would a message about Tradition be delivered to a N.O. nun?

This 👆👆👆
4
I’ve always held His Excellency in the highest regard but +Williamson’s near-obsession with private revelation and dubious apparitions has always confused and bothered me. Even if there’s nothing that explicitly contradicts the faith, there’s nothing of substance here that +Williamson couldn’t have said better in his own words without running the risk of potentially luring readers in to some strange apparition.

I remember once Bishop Tissier was asked about Fatima in an interview. He simply said “Fatima is private revelation so I don’t speak of it publicly.” At the time I was confused. But I understand his position now. Bishops have an incredible hold and influence on the faithful. If a traditional priest says something, most of us take it seriously. How much more a Bishop. Bishops need to be EXTREMELY careful what devotions they promote. It isn’t like you or I saying something off  the cuff at a coffee hour after Mass. people take +Williamson very seriously so I think he needs to do a better job of vetting things like this. If Bishop Tissier was unwilling to speak publicly about Fatima, a devotion with mountains of evidence about as close to “de fide” as a revelation like that can get, what does that say about +Williamson’s willingness to speak publicly about apparitions and visions like the one above…Just my two cents…

Great post!
5
World War III - Chapter 2 / Re: Texe Marrs- Khazars and Ukraine
« Last post by Giovanni Berto on Today at 11:27:14 AM »
Perhaps Mike79 could explain it, but as I understand, the Jєωs that have real ancestry to the ancient Hebrews are the Sephardi and some other smaller groups.

The αѕнкenαzι are converts, like the article says.

The bloods Jєωs are humiliated as they deserve, being led by converts.

I didn't know that the Khazars were so evil before they converted. I guess that they strongly identified with the ѕуηαgσgυє. Evil knows evil.
6
I think the biggest reason most "normal" people are against it is the concern that an innocent person might be found guilty and be put to death. 
7
Health and Nutrition / Re: Suffering from loneliness
« Last post by Bataar on Today at 11:18:17 AM »
What have you been up to lately?
Thankfully the weather has been getting nicer so I've been able to get out and do some fishing. That's been about it lately. Still haven't been able to come up with many things I want to go do by myself.
8
I’ve always held His Excellency in the highest regard but +Williamson’s near-obsession with private revelation and dubious apparitions has always confused and bothered me. Even if there’s nothing that explicitly contradicts the faith, there’s nothing of substance here that +Williamson couldn’t have said better in his own words without running the risk of potentially luring readers in to some strange apparition.

I remember once Bishop Tissier was asked about Fatima in an interview. He simply said “Fatima is private revelation so I don’t speak of it publicly.” At the time I was confused. But I understand his position now. Bishops have an incredible hold and influence on the faithful. If a traditional priest says something, most of us take it seriously. How much more a Bishop. Bishops need to be EXTREMELY careful what devotions they promote. It isn’t like you or I saying something off  the cuff at a coffee hour after Mass. people take +Williamson very seriously so I think he needs to do a better job of vetting things like this. If Bishop Tissier was unwilling to speak publicly about Fatima, a devotion with mountains of evidence about as close to “de fide” as a revelation like that can get, what does that say about +Williamson’s willingness to speak publicly about apparitions and visions like the one above…Just my two cents…

I fully agree.

On the bright side, it does show that we're not in a Bishop Williamson cult :)
9
I’ve always held His Excellency in the highest regard but +Williamson’s near-obsession with private revelation and dubious apparitions has always confused and bothered me. Even if there’s nothing that explicitly contradicts the faith, there’s nothing of substance here that +Williamson couldn’t have said better in his own words without running the risk of potentially luring readers in to some strange apparition.

I remember once Bishop Tissier was asked about Fatima in an interview. He simply said “Fatima is private revelation so I don’t speak of it publicly.” At the time I was confused. But I understand his position now. Bishops have an incredible hold and influence on the faithful. If a traditional priest says something, most of us take it seriously. How much more a Bishop. Bishops need to be EXTREMELY careful what devotions they promote. It isn’t like you or I saying something off  the cuff at a coffee hour after Mass. people take +Williamson very seriously so I think he needs to do a better job of vetting things like this. If Bishop Tissier was unwilling to speak publicly about Fatima, a devotion with mountains of evidence about as close to “de fide” as a revelation like that can get, what does that say about +Williamson’s willingness to speak publicly about apparitions and visions like the one above…Just my two cents…
10
Politics and World Leaders / Re: Homes are being abandoned.
« Last post by SimpleMan on Today at 10:31:54 AM »
Just a remark about the OP youtube video: Catholics aren't supposed to waste time...this video is long! At what TIME, (Minute) exactly does it mention WHY the property was abandonned? Was it even abandonned? Maybe it was sold!$$$. What a lousy presentation as someone already said. Time is precious: this video is 98% useless for eternal salvation.
And this is why I typically don't watch videos that people post (either here or elsewhere), not so much because of any spiritual considerations, but because my time is valuable to me (at 63, I may have 20 good years left, maybe a few more) and I find that videos of all types tend to ramble on, when what they have to say, could be summed up in a few sentences of printed text.  Firearms videos are notorious for this.  I don't need to spend 20 minutes watching the guy unbox the gun and talking about it, I just want to see the gun and see how it shoots.

I prefer to read, to gather information, rather than watch video or listen to a talk.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 20