Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Rick Santorum Supporters?  (Read 16918 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8212
  • Reputation: +7174/-7
  • Gender: Male
Rick Santorum Supporters?
« Reply #75 on: February 14, 2012, 10:46:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MyrnaM
    Your probably right about rigging the election SS, but I will still exercise my right to vote. We must not give up hope.


    What's the point of voting if your votes don't count? That's probably why the SSPX usually encourages people not to vote. Also, read this protocol of the Zionists:

    Quote
    PROTOCOL No. 10
    1. To-day I begin with a repetition of what I said before, and I BEG YOU TO BEAR IN MIND THAT GOVERNMENTS AND PEOPLE ARE CONTENT IN THE POLITICAL WITH OUTSIDE APPEARANCES. And how, indeed, are the GOYIM to perceive the underlying meaning of things when their representatives give the best of their energies to enjoying themselves? For our policy it is of the greatest importance to take cognizance of this detail; it will be of assistance to us when we come to consider the division of authority of property, of the dwelling, of taxation (the idea of concealed taxes), of the reflex force of the laws. All these questions are such as ought not to be touched upon directly and openly before the people. In cases where it is indispensable to touch upon them they must not be categorically named, it must merely be declared without detailed exposition that the principles of contemporary law are acknowledged by us. The reason of keeping silence in this respect is that by not naming a principle we leave ourselves freedom of action, to drop this or that out of it without attracting notice; if they were all categorically named they would all appear to have been already given.

    2. The mob cherishes a special affection and respect for the geniuses of political power and accepts all their deeds of violence with the admiring response: "rascally, well, yes, it is rascally, but it's clever! ... a trick, if you like, but how craftily played, how magnificently done, what impudent audacity!" ...

    OUR GOAL - WORLD POWER
    3. We count upon attracting all nations to the task of erecting the new fundamental structure, the project for which has been drawn up by us. This is why, before everything, it is indispensable for us to arm ourselves and to store up in ourselves that absolutely reckless audacity and irresistible might of the spirit which in the person of our active workers will break down all hindrances on our way.

    4. WHEN WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED OUR COUP D'ETAT WE SHALL SAY THEN TO THE VARIOUS PEOPLES: "EVERYTHING HAS GONE TERRIBLY BADLY, ALL HAVE BEEN WORN OUT WITH SUFFERING. WE ARE DESTROYING THE CAUSES OF YOUR TORMENT - NATIONALITIES, FRONTIERS, DIFFERENCES OF COINAGES. YOU ARE AT LIBERTY, OF COURSE, TO PRONOUNCE SENTENCE UPON US, BUT CAN IT POSSIBLY BE A JUST ONE IF IT IS CONFIRMED BY YOU BEFORE YOU MAKE ANY TRIAL OF WHAT WE ARE OFFERING YOU." ... THEN WILL THE MOB EXALT US AND BEAR US UP IN THEIR HANDS IN A UNANIMOUS TRIUMPH OF HOPES AND EXPECTATIONS. VOTING, WHICH WE HAVE MADE THE INSTRUMENT WHICH WILL SET US ON THE THRONE OF THE WORLD BY TEACHING EVEN THE VERY SMALLEST UNITS OF MEMBERS OF THE HUMAN RACE TO VOTE BY MEANS OF MEETINGS AND AGREEMENTS BY GROUPS, WILL THEN HAVE SERVED ITS PURPOSES AND WILL PLAY ITS PART THEN FOR THE LAST TIME BY A UNANIMITY OF DESIRE TO MAKE CLOSE ACQUAINTANCE WITH US BEFORE CONDEMNING US.

    5. TO SECURE THIS WE MUST HAVE EVERYBODY VOTE WITHOUT DISTINCTION OF CLASSES AND QUALIFICATIONS, in order to establish an absolute majority, which cannot be got from the educated propertied classes. In this way, by inculcating in all a sense of self-importance, we shall destroy among the GOYIM the importance of the family and its educational value and remove the possibility of individual minds splitting off, for the mob, handled by us, will not let them come to the front nor even give them a hearing; it is accustomed to listen to us only who pay it for obedience and attention. In this way we shall create a blind, mighty force which will never be in a position to move in any direction without the guidance of our agents set at its head by us as leaders of the mob. The people will submit to this regime because it will know that upon these leaders will depend its earnings, gratifications and the receipt of all kinds of benefits.

    6. A scheme of government should come ready made from one brain, because it will never be clinched firmly if it is allowed to be split into fractional parts in the minds of many. It is allowable, therefore, for us to have cognizance of the scheme of action but not to discuss it lest we disturb its artfulness, the interdependence of its component parts, the practical force of the secret meaning of each clause. To discuss and make alterations in a labor of this kind by means of numerous votings is to impress upon it the stamp of all ratiocinations and misunderstandings which have failed to penetrate the depth and nexus of its plottings. We want our schemes to be forcible and suitably concocted. Therefore WE OUGHT NOT TO FLING THE WORK OF GENIUS OF OUR GUIDE to the fangs of the mob or even of a select company.

    7. These schemes will not turn existing institutions upside down just yet. They will only effect changes in their economy and consequently in the whole combined movement of their progress, which will thus be directed along the paths laid down in our schemes.

    POISON OF LIBERALISM
    8. Under various names there exists in all countries approximately one and the same thing. Representation, Ministry, Senate, State Council, Legislative and Executive Corps. I need not explain to you the mechanism of the relation of these institutions to one another, because you are aware of all that; only take note of the fact that each of the above-named institutions corresponds to some important function of the State, and I would beg you to remark that the word "important" I apply not to the institution but to the function, consequently it is not the institutions which are important but their functions. These institutions have divided up among themselves all the functions of government - administrative, legislative, executive, wherefore they have come to operate as do the organs in the human body. If we injure one part in the machinery of State, the State falls sick, like a human body, and ... will die.

    9. When we introduced into the State organism the poison of Liberalism its whole political complexion underwent a change. States have been seized with a mortal illness - blood poisoning. All that remains is to await the end of their death agony.

    10. Liberalism produced Constitutional States, which took the place of what was the only safeguard of the GOYIM, namely, Despotism; and A CONSTITUTION, AS YOU WELL KNOW, IS NOTHING ELSE BUT A SCHOOL OF DISCORDS, misunderstandings, quarrels, disagreements, fruitless party agitations, party whims - in a word, a school of everything that serves to destroy the personality of State activity. THE TRIBUNE OF THE "TALKERIES" HAS, NO LESS EFFECTIVELY THAN THE PRESS, CONDEMNED THE RULERS TO INACTIVITY AND IMPOTENCE, and thereby rendered them useless and superfluous, for which reason indeed they have been in many countries deposed. THEN IT WAS THAT THE ERA OF REPUBLICS BECOME POSSIBLE OF REALIZATION; AND THEN IT WAS THAT WE REPLACED THE RULER BY A CARICATURE OF A GOVERNMENT - BY A PRESIDENT, TAKEN FROM THE MOB, FROM THE MIDST OF OUR PUPPET CREATURES, OR SLAVES. This was the foundation of the mine which we have laid under the GOY people, I should rather say, under the GOY peoples.

    WE NAME PRESIDENTS
    11. In the near future we shall establish the responsibility of presidents.

    12. By that time we shall be in a position to disregard forms in carrying through matters for which our impersonal puppet will be responsible. What do we care if the ranks of those striving for power should be thinned, if there should arise a deadlock from the impossibility of finding presidents, a deadlock which will finally disorganize the country? ...

    13. In order that our scheme may produce this result we shall arrange elections in favor of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain, some "Panama" or other - then they will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans out of fear of revelations and from the natural desire of everyone who has attained power, namely, the retention of the privileges, advantages and honor connected with the office of president. The chamber of deputies will provide cover for, will protect, will elect presidents, but we shall take from it the right to propose new, or make changes in existing laws, for this right will be given by us to the responsible president, a puppet in our hands. Naturally, the authority of the presidents will then become a target for every possible form of attack, but we shall provide him with a means of self-defense in the right of an appeal to the people, for the decision of the people over the heads of their representatives, that is to say, an appeal to that same blind slave of ours - the majority of the mob. Independently of this we shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal, in case of need for the defense of the new republican constitution, the right to defend which will belong to him as the responsible representative of this constitution. (Iran? Grenada? Kuwait? Iraq? Panama? Somalia? Bosnia? Kosovo? Indonesia?)

    14. It is easy to understand that in these conditions the key of the shrine will lie in our hands, and no one outside ourselves will any longer direct the force of legislation.

    15. Besides this we shall, with the introduction of the new republican constitution, take from the Chamber the right of interpolation on government measures, on the pretext of preserving political secrecy, and, further, we shall by the new constitution reduce the number of representatives to a minimum, thereby proportionately reducing political passions and the passion for politics. If, however, they should, which is hardly to be expected, burst into flame, even in this minimum, we shall nullify them by a stirring appeal and a reference to the majority of the whole people ... Upon the president will depend the appointment of presidents and vice-presidents of the Chamber and the Senate. Instead of constant sessions of Parliaments we shall reduce their sittings to a few months. Moreover, the president, as chief of the executive power, will have the right to summon and dissolve Parliament, and, in the latter case, to prolong the time for the appointment of a new parliamentary assembly. But in order that the consequences of all these acts which in substance are illegal, should not, prematurely for our plans, fall upon the responsibility established by us of the president, WE SHALL INSTIGATE MINISTERS AND OTHER OFFICIALS OF THE HIGHER ADMINISTRATION ABOUT THE PRESIDENT TO EVADE HIS DISPOSITIONS BY TAKING MEASURES OF THEIR OWN, for doing which they will be made the scapegoats in his place ... This part we especially recommend to be given to be played by the Senate, the Council of State, or the Council of Ministers, but not to an individual official.

    16. The president will, at our discretion, interpret the sense of such of the existing laws as admit of various interpretation; he will further annul them when we indicate to him the necessity to do so, besides this, he will have the right to propose temporary laws, and even new departures in the government constitutional working, the pretext both for the one and the other being the requirements for the supreme welfare of the State. (Presidential Decrees such as F.D.R. employed to debase the US dollar and steal the gold and to place the U.S. under a permanent State of Emergency and War against its own citizens?)

    WE SHALL DESTROY
    17. By such measure we shall obtain the power of destroying little by little, step by step, all that at the outset when we enter on our rights, we are compelled to introduce into the constitutions of States to prepare for the transition to an imperceptible abolition of every kind of constitution, and then the time is come to turn every form of government into OUR DESPOTISM.

    18. The recognition of our despot may also come before the destruction of the constitution; the moment for this recognition will come when the peoples, utterly wearied by the irregularities and incompetence - a matter which we shall arrange for - of their rulers, will clamor: "Away with them and give us one king over all the earth who will unite us and annihilate the causes of disorders - frontiers, nationalities, religions, State debts - who will give us peace and quiet which we cannot find under our rulers and representatives."

    19. But you yourselves perfectly well know that TO PRODUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF THE EXPRESSION OF SUCH WISHES BY ALL THE NATIONS IT IS INDISPENSABLE TO TROUBLE IN ALL COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE'S RELATIONS WITH THEIR GOVERNMENTS SO AS TO UTTERLY EXHAUST HUMANITY WITH DISSENSION, HATRED, STRUGGLE, ENVY AND EVEN BY THE USE OF TORTURE, BY STARVATION, BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES, BY WANT, SO THAT THE "GOYIM" SEE NO OTHER ISSUE THAN TO TAKE REFUGE IN OUR COMPLETE SOVEREIGNTY IN MONEY AND IN ALL ELSE.

    20. But if we give the nations of the world a breathing space the moment we long for is hardly likely ever to arrive.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline MyrnaM

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6273
    • Reputation: +3629/-347
    • Gender: Female
      • Myforever.blog/blog
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #76 on: February 14, 2012, 10:57:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That is another big difference then, because CMRI encourages all to vote.  

    Please pray for my soul.
    R.I.P. 8/17/22

    My new blog @ https://myforever.blog/blog/


    Offline Pepsuber

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 170
    • Reputation: +50/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #77 on: February 14, 2012, 11:14:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MyrnaM
    I agree with Rick Santorum on the news today, that he PROMISED TO end gαy marriages.

    How would he go about doing that?

    Offline Pepsuber

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 170
    • Reputation: +50/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #78 on: February 14, 2012, 11:19:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If the CMRI encourages people to vote and the SSPX encourages people not to vote, then the CMRI is right on this issue and the SSPX is wrong. One can abstain from voting if all the candidates are unworthy (it doesn't matter if one is more or less unworthy), but that is for a particular office, not an entire ballot. It can't be terribly common that there are no good candidates at all on the whole ballot.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32966
    • Reputation: +29275/-598
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #79 on: February 14, 2012, 01:01:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Pepsuber
    Quote from: MyrnaM
    I agree with Rick Santorum on the news today, that he PROMISED TO end gαy marriages.


    How would he go about doing that?


    Good question -- it sounds like a modern variation of "Forty acres and a mule!" or "A chicken in every pot!" to me.

    If there's no reasonable or feasible way for the President to do this, it's all fluff, if not outright deception.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.


    Offline MyrnaM

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6273
    • Reputation: +3629/-347
    • Gender: Female
      • Myforever.blog/blog
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #80 on: February 14, 2012, 01:42:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Pepsuber
    Quote from: MyrnaM
    I agree with Rick Santorum on the news today, that he PROMISED TO end gαy marriages.

    How would he go about doing that?


    How did they make it a law in the first place, if they can't undo it?

     

    Please pray for my soul.
    R.I.P. 8/17/22

    My new blog @ https://myforever.blog/blog/

    Offline Pepsuber

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 170
    • Reputation: +50/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #81 on: February 14, 2012, 02:22:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MyrnaM
    How did they make it a law in the first place, if they can't undo it?

    I didn't say "they" can't. I said Santorum can't. What can Santorum do to end gαy marriage? Send in the troops? A constitutional amendment would have no chance of ratification.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32966
    • Reputation: +29275/-598
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #82 on: February 14, 2012, 02:25:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Pepsuber
    Quote from: MyrnaM
    How did they make it a law in the first place, if they can't undo it?

    I didn't say "they" can't. I said Santorum can't. What can Santorum do to end gαy marriage? Send in the troops? A constitutional amendment would have no chance of ratification.


    Exactly.

    It's simplistic to think that all levels of government and positions of power are interchangeable and equal in influence/importance.

    Right now "gαy marriage" is a State thing. Unless the President A) supported and B) managed to pass (there's the rub) a Constitutional amendment banning gαy marriage, there's nothing a President can do short of "sending in troops".

    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.


    Offline MyrnaM

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6273
    • Reputation: +3629/-347
    • Gender: Female
      • Myforever.blog/blog
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #83 on: February 14, 2012, 02:33:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew
    Quote from: Pepsuber
    Quote from: MyrnaM
    How did they make it a law in the first place, if they can't undo it?

    I didn't say "they" can't. I said Santorum can't. What can Santorum do to end gαy marriage? Send in the troops? A constitutional amendment would have no chance of ratification.


    Exactly.

    It's simplistic to think that all levels of government and positions of power are interchangeable and equal in influence/importance.

    Right now "gαy marriage" is a State thing. Unless the President A) supported and B) managed to pass (there's the rub) a Constitutional amendment banning gαy marriage, there's nothing a President can do short of "sending in troops".



    I have a strong feeling it would be easier for a good President who had the will to do it, can do it; AND quicker than SSPX can convert the novus ordo church, they so want to be united with, in order to bring her back to Tradition.  
    Please pray for my soul.
    R.I.P. 8/17/22

    My new blog @ https://myforever.blog/blog/

    Offline jman123

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 541
    • Reputation: +149/-15
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #84 on: February 14, 2012, 03:52:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    How about 101 reasons to vote for Ron Paul?

    101 reasons to vote for Ron Paul in 2012

    1. He Supports the Constitution. (Wow Go Figure!)
    2. He Believes In Religious Freedom.
    3. He Has Never Voted For A Tax Increase.
    4. He Is Against Public Funding Of Abortion.
    5. He Is Against Funding Abortion Abroad.
    6. He Is Against The National I.D. or Real I.D. Act.
    7. He Believes In The "Just War Theory".
    8. He Supports The Rights Of Private Property Owners.
    9. He Wants Us Out Of The U.N.
    10. He Wants Us To Trade With Nations And Not War With Them.
    11. He Is For 2nd Amendment Rights.
    12. He Opposes NAIS.
    13. He Wants To Shrink The Federal Government, Not Expand It.
    14. He Has No Plans To Start A War With Iran Or Anyone Else.
    15. He Wants To Bring Our Troops Home.
    16. He Does Not Belong To The CFR (Council On Foreign Relations).
    17. He Has Not Received Campaign Contributions From Rupert Murdoch
    (Like Hillary).
    18. His Running Mate Most Likely Will Not Have Shot Anyone In The Face.
    19. He Wants To End The I.R.S..
    20. He Wants To Cut Spending?? Really, Cut Spending.
    21. He Is Against Eminent Domain.
    22. He Is Against The NAFTA Superhighway.
    23. He Is Against The North American Union Or SPP (It Exists Google It).
    24. He Is For The Principle Of Sound Money.
    25. He Is Against The Idea of The Amero (Google It).
    26. He Is Against The Federal Reserve's Monopoly On Monetary Regulation.
    27. He Is Philosophically Opposed To Big Government.
    28. He Voted Against The Misnamed Patriot Act That Stripped Us Of Our Rights.
    29. He Is For The Bill Of Rights.
    30. He Knows The Meaning Of Liberty.
    31. He Was 1 Of 4 People That Supported Reagan Early On.
    32. He Has Been Married For 50 Years, Which Is An Achievement These Days.
    33. He Is Not Married To Hillary.
    34. His Supporters Love Him.
    35. He Is A Once In A Lifetime Candidate.
    36. Because His Record Is Consistent.
    37. He Is Against Funding The So-Called War On Drugs (Another Unsuccessful War).
    38. He Is Actually Against Funding Many Unsuccessful Federal Programs.
    39. He Does Not Want To Ruin Healthcare By Nationalizing It, (LikeHillary, Obama, et al.)
    40. He Is A Student Of History.
    41. He Votes In Accordance With The Constitution.
    42. He Will Not Forcibly Implant Us Or Our Troops With Microchips Or
    Like Devices (It's For Your Safety, Of Course).
    43. He Is The Only Conservative, In The Traditional Sense, Left.
    44. Republicans Love Him Because He Is For Small Government.
    45. Democrats Love Him Because He Will End The War For Oil.
    46. Libertarians Love Him Because He Wants The Government Out Of Their Business.
    47. He Is The Only Electable Republican Candidate.
    48. He is Against The Creation Of A Surveillance Society (See London).
    49. He Supports Homeschool Rights.
    50. He Wants To End The Corporate Welfare System That Is Destroying
    Our Government's Credibility.
    51. He Tells It Like It Is. He Is Truthful.
    52. He Reads.
    53. As A Doctor, He Is Informed On The Healthcare Issue.
    54. He Has Not Been Hannitized.
    55. He Has The Courage To Speak Out Against What Is Wrong.
    56. He Will Be Good For The Economy (Freedom Generally Is Good For
    The Economy).
    57. He Wants Us Out Of The WTO And Like Organizations.
    58. The I.R.S. Is Scared Of This Guy.
    59. He Is Smart Enough To Prefer Gold Over Paper.
    60. He Knows The Term FIAT-CURRENCY and knows what it means.
    61. He Wants To Secure Our Borders.
    62. He Favors Guarding Our Country Over Policing The World.
    63. He Opposed The War In Iraq >From The Beginning.
    64. He Authorized The Hunt For Osama Bin Laden.
    65. He Believes Local Governments Are Better Suited To Handle Their Own Issues.
    66. He Is Willing To Listen And Reason With Others.
    67. He Is A Christian Who Believes Christ Was Right When He Said,
    "Blessed Are The Peacemakers".
    68. He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
    69. He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
    70. He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
    71. He has never taken a government-paid junket.
    72. He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
    73. He voted against regulating the Internet.
    74. He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
    75. He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to
    the U.S. treasury every year.
    76. He Is Against Selective Service Registration.
    77. He Is Against A Mandatory Draft.
    78. He Is Still Not Married To Hillary.
    79. He Has The Support Of The Youth.
    80. His Campaign Has People Across The Country Motivated.
    81. His Supporters Are Enthusiastic.
    82. He Is Educated.
    83. He Wants To Apply The Golden Rule In Government (How Radical).
    84. He Believes in Freedom Of Speech.
    85. He Believes In Individual Rights
    86. He Believes Those Rights Come From Our Creator.
    87. He Does Not "Move With The Herd".
    88. He Has Delivered Over 4,000 Babies And Values Life.
    89. He Doesn't Have To "Act The Part" Because He Is What He Is.
    90. He Has Not Waffled On The Abortion Issue As Every Other
    Republican Candidate.
    91. He Has Faced Tremendous Opposition With Dignity.
    92. He Is Optimistic
    93. He Values The Traditions That Have Kept Us Free.
    94. He Understands That Monopolies Are Bad Things.
    95. He Understands The Difference Between Individual And Government
    Responsibility.
    96. He Understands Inflation Is Not Just The Prices Going Up, But
    Rather The Value Of Money Going Down.
    97. You Will Feel Good About Your Vote For A Change.
    98. You Will Know You Have Done The Right Thing.
    99. For The First Time In A Long Time, You Will Not Be Voting "For The Least Worst".
    100. You Will Help Undo The Damage Done To Our Country Over The Last
    Several Decades.
    101. He Is Our Last Hope For A Free Nation.


    Supporting religious freedom is not Catholic. He does not believe in the Social Kingship of Christ

    He wants gαys in the military. Hardly Catholic principles. Santorum is our hope.

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7174/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #85 on: February 14, 2012, 03:53:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MyrnaM
    I have a strong feeling it would be easier for a good President who had the will to do it, can do it; AND quicker than SSPX can convert the novus ordo church, they so want to be united with, in order to bring her back to Tradition.


    You may be interested in what Hugh Atkins (a Traditional Catholic) has to say about Rick Santorum vs. Ron Paul:

    http://www.catholicactionresourcecenter.com/santorumvsronpaul.htm
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.


    Offline Pepsuber

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 170
    • Reputation: +50/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #86 on: February 14, 2012, 06:29:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: jman123
    Supporting religious freedom is not Catholic. He does not believe in the Social Kingship of Christ

    He wants gαys in the military. Hardly Catholic principles. Santorum is our hope.

    Do you earnestly think that Santorum does not support religious freedom?

    One might say that American exceptionalism isn't Catholic, either -- and yet Santorum is a proponent of it. In fact one of his criticisms of the current occupant of the White House is that he does not believe in American exceptionalism.

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7174/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #87 on: February 14, 2012, 06:55:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: jman123
    Santorum is our hope.


    Supporting Zionist Jews (Israel) is not part of the Social Kingship of Christ.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #88 on: February 14, 2012, 07:01:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    Quote from: jman123
    Santorum is our hope.


    Supporting Zionist Jews (Israel) is not part of the Social Kingship of Christ.


    EXACTLY!

    Offline Diego

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1277
    • Reputation: +4/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #89 on: February 14, 2012, 10:30:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: InfiniteFaith
    LOL....i just looked it up and found that there are only 13.5 million Jews in the world. Give me a break...you people are acting as though this Zionism garbage is just as much of a threat as Sharia Law.

    There are more than 1.6 Billion Muslims in the world, and Sharia law is spreading throughout the middle east like wildfire. 13.5 million Jews are no match to 1.6 Billion Muslims, and the jews are in no position to successfully implement this zionist stuff in America or Europe. I would bet everything I own on that.


    Yeah, Infinite Faith, you're probably right and God was probably wrong to focus so much attention on the "Jews."  You know better than God. God should have warned us about the "leaven of the Muslims."

    Could one of you Santorum Shabbos goyim get that Infinite Faith guy his yarmulke and drive him back to the ѕуηαgσgυє?