Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Rick Santorum Supporters?  (Read 16798 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline InfiniteFaith

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1590
  • Reputation: +168/-2
  • Gender: Male
Rick Santorum Supporters?
« Reply #60 on: February 13, 2012, 04:34:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Pepsuber
    Quote from: InfiniteFaith
    Quote from: Pepsuber
    Quote from: InfiniteFaith
    Because of this, it makes sense as to why their scientists would be killed.

    By "makes sense," do you mean that you think it is morally justified?


    No

    Stop right there, that is all I need to know. :-) If it isn't morally justified, then one shouldn't support it.


    It seems to me like you support equal rights for muslims. What do you think about giving them a fair chance in the American congress?

    Offline alaric

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3359
    • Reputation: +2475/-432
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #61 on: February 13, 2012, 06:09:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Nishant,

    "Among other things, the very reason he just mentioned. That several of them have taken to the streets in protest, some of whom have been killed. He also does have credibility on this issue because he warned of it long ago, and this situation could have been avoided. Obama only imposed sanctions after Congress forced him to, and after fighting it tooth and nail. "

    This proves nothing much less some kind of "revolution" going on in Iran, there were some protests a few years ago that became quite violent on both sides due in part to the protesters who were emboldened and probably financed by Western and Israeli influences, backing the "Persian Awakening" in an attempt to overthrow the Ahmadinejad regime during a disputed election.

    We also have had some major protests here in America as of late if you haven't noticed lately, some became quite violent as well, but I don't see the need of another major superpower sticking their noses in our affairs, this kind of intervention has a way of unifying a people against the alien meddler instead of the opposite effect.

    Also just what is Santorum's "credibility" on Iranian internal affairs? Again, who made him an authority on whats good for Iran?

    And as opposed as I am of just about everything Obama, I have to give him some credit for not taking the bait and going to war with a nation that has done or said nothing to justify another pre-emptive strike because it "might" be producing WMD's.


    Offline alaric

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3359
    • Reputation: +2475/-432
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #62 on: February 13, 2012, 06:27:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Nishant,

    "Non-interventionism, if it ever was an option, is at least not an option when a possible nuclear power is concerned. It also would provide the immunity to carry out the kind of proxy attacks Iran has long freely carried out, culminating lately in the attempted assasination of the Saudi ambassador"

    So are we to take out any and all nations capable of developing nukes that might be a concieved "threat" to American (See Israeli) interests? Where does that leave us with Pakistan? Or China? North Korea? Where do we keep going with this?

    And proxy attacks? Where? Iran is pretty much pinned down right now fighting for it's economic life thanks to sanctions and Obama refusing American banks to do business with it, if the Iranians are "attacking" it's pretty much in self defense mode or survival, what would the U.S. do in the same situation? Oh but there is a nation carrying out many proxy attacks right now, you can bet on it.

    And the so-called Saudi ambassador assassination attempt (using the Mexican drug cartel nonetheless), you can't be serious that you buy into that little dog and pony show, everyone and I mean everyone knows that was a ruse

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7174/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #63 on: February 13, 2012, 09:07:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: InfiniteFaith
    LOL....i just looked it up and found that there are only 13.5 million Jews in the world. Give me a break...you people are acting as though this Zionism garbage is just as much of a threat as Sharia Law.

    There are more than 1.6 Billion Muslims in the world, and Sharia law is spreading throughout the middle east like wildfire. 13.5 million Jews are no match to 1.6 Billion Muslims, and the jews are in no position to successfully implement this zionist stuff in America or Europe. I would bet everything I own on that.


    The protocols I posted are proof that Zionism is more dangerous. The Church's stance before Vatican II was that the Jews are more dangerous to the Church than any other religion.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline InfiniteFaith

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1590
    • Reputation: +168/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #64 on: February 13, 2012, 09:11:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    Quote from: InfiniteFaith
    LOL....i just looked it up and found that there are only 13.5 million Jews in the world. Give me a break...you people are acting as though this Zionism garbage is just as much of a threat as Sharia Law.

    There are more than 1.6 Billion Muslims in the world, and Sharia law is spreading throughout the middle east like wildfire. 13.5 million Jews are no match to 1.6 Billion Muslims, and the jews are in no position to successfully implement this zionist stuff in America or Europe. I would bet everything I own on that.


    The protocols I posted are proof that Zionism is more dangerous. The Church's stance before Vatican II was that the Jews are more dangerous to the Church than any other religion.


    Maybe if the number of Jєωιѕн followers increased dramatically...which yeah I agree will happen closer to the time of the Antichrist. But the Antichrist will come probably around 500 years from now. While the potential may be there, I think that in this day and age, the Jews are not as much of a threat as the Muslims.


    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7174/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #65 on: February 13, 2012, 09:19:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: InfiniteFaith
    Maybe if the number of Jєωιѕн followers increased dramatically...which yeah I agree will happen closer to the time of the Antichrist. But the Antichrist will come probably around 500 years from now. While the potential may be there, I think that in this day and age, the Jews are not as much of a threat as the Muslims.


    If you understand what the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr is, you will also understand that the Jєωιѕн Masons are a bigger threat not only to the Catholic Church, but to the whole world, more-so than the Muslims could ever hope to be.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Catholic Samurai

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2821
    • Reputation: +748/-14
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #66 on: February 13, 2012, 10:09:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • For Nish and IF.




    TEHRAN—Amidst mounting geopolitical tensions, Iranian officials said Wednesday they were increasingly concerned about the United States of America's uranium-enrichment program, fearing the Western nation may soon be capable of producing its 8,500th nuclear weapon. "Our intelligence estimates indicate that, if it is allowed to progress with its aggressive nuclear program, the United States may soon possess its 8,500th atomic weapon capable of reaching Iran," said Iranian foreign minister Ali Akbar Salehi, adding that Americans have the fuel, the facilities, and "everything they need" to manufacture even more weapons-grade fissile material. "Obviously, the prospect of this happening is very distressing to Iran and all countries like Iran. After all, the United States is a volatile nation that's proven it needs little provocation to attack anyone anywhere in the world whom it perceives to be a threat." Iranian intelligence experts also warned of the very real, and very frightening, possibility of the U.S. providing weapons and resources to a rogue third-party state such as Israel.


    http://www.theonion.com/articles/iran-worried-us-might-be-building-8500th-nuclear-w,27325/
    "Louvada Siesa O' Sanctisimo Sacramento!"~warcry of the Amakusa/Shimabara rebels

    "We must risk something for God!"~Hernan Cortes


    TEJANO AND PROUD!

    Offline InfiniteFaith

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1590
    • Reputation: +168/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #67 on: February 13, 2012, 10:14:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Catholic Samurai

    For Nish and IF.




    TEHRAN—Amidst mounting geopolitical tensions, Iranian officials said Wednesday they were increasingly concerned about the United States of America's uranium-enrichment program, fearing the Western nation may soon be capable of producing its 8,500th nuclear weapon. "Our intelligence estimates indicate that, if it is allowed to progress with its aggressive nuclear program, the United States may soon possess its 8,500th atomic weapon capable of reaching Iran," said Iranian foreign minister Ali Akbar Salehi, adding that Americans have the fuel, the facilities, and "everything they need" to manufacture even more weapons-grade fissile material. "Obviously, the prospect of this happening is very distressing to Iran and all countries like Iran. After all, the United States is a volatile nation that's proven it needs little provocation to attack anyone anywhere in the world whom it perceives to be a threat." Iranian intelligence experts also warned of the very real, and very frightening, possibility of the U.S. providing weapons and resources to a rogue third-party state such as Israel.


    http://www.theonion.com/articles/iran-worried-us-might-be-building-8500th-nuclear-w,27325/


    LOL. The only problem with this mockery is that they are not concerned with Russia's nuclear missiles being able to reach Iran. I give them credit for their humor though. Just like how they built toy replicas of the spy plane and handed them out to their citizens as a joke.


    Offline InfiniteFaith

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1590
    • Reputation: +168/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #68 on: February 13, 2012, 10:16:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    Quote from: InfiniteFaith
    Maybe if the number of Jєωιѕн followers increased dramatically...which yeah I agree will happen closer to the time of the Antichrist. But the Antichrist will come probably around 500 years from now. While the potential may be there, I think that in this day and age, the Jews are not as much of a threat as the Muslims.


    If you understand what the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr is, you will also understand that the Jєωιѕн Masons are a bigger threat not only to the Catholic Church, but to the whole world, more-so than the Muslims could ever hope to be.


    nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr being a one world government right? This is the first I have heard of Judaism being a player in all of that. I am sure the Freemasons are. Even the President of Iran has voiced his opinion that there should be a One World Government. And yes, I agree that if this is to happen (which it is inevitable) then that will mark the time of the Antichrist.

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7174/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #69 on: February 13, 2012, 11:39:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm not a fan of the Dimond Brothers, but they do have a great video about why our votes DO NOT COUNT.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/mhfm1#p/u/6/OynCgwmD-HM
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Busillis

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 262
    • Reputation: +118/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #70 on: February 14, 2012, 01:34:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    I'm not a fan of the Dimond Brothers, but they do have a great video about why our votes DO NOT COUNT.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/mhfm1#p/u/6/OynCgwmD-HM


    I haven't watched the entire video, but the Dimond guy is saying that it's imposible to determine a winner using exit polls, because the exit polls only collect 4/10ths of 1 percent of who has been voted for, and that is simply not enough to determine a winner. But Pelley says that Gungrich is projected, not determined, to be the winner. So it's an educated guess.


    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7174/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #71 on: February 14, 2012, 10:11:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    I haven't watched the entire video, but the Dimond guy is saying that it's imposible to determine a winner using exit polls, because the exit polls only collect 4/10ths of 1 percent of who has been voted for, and that is simply not enough to determine a winner. But Pelley says that Gungrich is projected, not determined, to be the winner. So it's an educated guess.


    You need to watch the whole video to get it. And explain to me how you can project a winner with less than one percent? At the time they projected Gingrich as the winner, Romney was LEADING.

    And I don't know if you saw this part of the video or not, but they show that both CBS AND FOX show the same number of people they interviewed in their exit polls (2,831 I believe was the number) out of over 601,000 voters. How can you project the winner after interviewing such a minority?
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline MyrnaM

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6273
    • Reputation: +3629/-347
    • Gender: Female
      • Myforever.blog/blog
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #72 on: February 14, 2012, 10:31:10 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I agree with Rick Santorum on the news today, that he PROMISED TO end gαy marriages.   I am especially concerned since they just signed into law in my state, the state of Washington, that gαy marriages are legal.    Yuk!  God have mercy on the state of Washington!

    We will never fix the other things till we end gαy marriage and abortion.  

    I vote for Rick Santorum!
    Please pray for my soul.
    R.I.P. 8/17/22

    My new blog @ https://myforever.blog/blog/

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7174/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #73 on: February 14, 2012, 10:33:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MyrnaM
    I vote for Rick Santorum!


    His stance on gαy marriage may be Catholic, but his stance on war isn't. Romney and Gingrich both "pledge" to end gαy marriage too. Does that mean we should vote for either of them?

    And the video I posted pretty much proves that they will rig the election to make Obama re-elected.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline MyrnaM

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6273
    • Reputation: +3629/-347
    • Gender: Female
      • Myforever.blog/blog
    Rick Santorum Supporters?
    « Reply #74 on: February 14, 2012, 10:39:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Your probably right about rigging the election SS, but I will still exercise my right to vote.  We must not give up hope.

    Who knows if they are right about 2012, we might not even have another President.  

    Read this, I just received in my email:  

    <<<In 1887 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh ,

    had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior:

    "A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent

    form of government.

    A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can

    vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.

    From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the

    most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally

    collapse over loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship."

    "The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has

    been about 200 years.

    During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

    From bondage to spiritual faith;
    From spiritual faith to great courage;
    From courage to liberty;
    From liberty to abundance;
    From abundance to complacency;
    From complacency to apathy;
    From apathy to dependence;
    From dependence back into bondage."
    The Obituary follows:

    Born 1776, Died 2012
    It doesn't hurt to read this several times.

    Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul , Minnesota ,

    points out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election:

    Number of States won by: Obama: 19 McCain: 29
    Square miles of land won by: Obama: 580,000 McCain: 2,427,000
    Population of counties won by: Obama: 127 million McCain: 143 million
    Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2.1

    Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was
    mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.

    Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income
    tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."

    Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the
    "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy,
    with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached
    the "governmental dependency" phase.

    If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
    invaders called illegal's - and they vote - then we can say goodbye to the
    USA in fewer than five years.

    Of course we are not a democracy, we are a Constitutional Republic .

    Someone should point this out to Obama.

    Of course we know he and too many others pay little attention to The Constitution.

    There couldn't be more at stake than on Nov 2012.>>>


    Please pray for my soul.
    R.I.P. 8/17/22

    My new blog @ https://myforever.blog/blog/