Author Topic: Proof that the Elections are rigged (Read 5788 times)

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **on:** February 13, 2012, 11:40:47 PM »

I'm not a fan of the Dimond Brothers, but they have an excellent video on why the elections are rigged. It all makes sense. Just watch the video and see for yourself.

http://www.youtube.com/user/mhfm1#p/u/6/OynCgwmD-HM

Telesphorus · « **Reply #1 on:** February 14, 2012, 12:00:07 AM »

Do you know anything about statistics SS?

I'm not saying the elections aren't rigged, but the Dimonds are definitely coming up short in this video.

Busillis · « **Reply #2 on:** February 14, 2012, 01:42:05 AM »

Just saw this thread. Posted this on the other thread where you have the video:

"I haven't watched the entire video, but the Dimond guy is saying that it's imposible to determine a winner using exit polls, because the exit polls only collect 4/10ths of 1 percent of who has been voted for, and that is simply not enough to determine a winner. But Pelley says that Gungrich is projected, not determined, to be the winner. So it's an educated guess. "

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #3 on:** February 14, 2012, 10:16:41 AM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Do you know anything about statistics SS?

I'm not saying the elections aren't rigged, but the Dimonds are definitely coming up short in this video.

Did you watch the entire video? You can question what I know about statistics, but to make a statement like that, you either didn't watch the whole video or don't have a thorough understanding of what the NWO is and how they can rig votes. If you understand what the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr is and what their plans are, then you should also understand that they will NEVER let a man like Ron Paul win. I disagree with the Dimonds on a lot of things, but they are spot-on in this video.

Quote from: Busillis

I haven't watched the entire video, but the Dimond guy is saying that it's imposible to determine a winner using exit polls, because the exit polls only collect 4/10ths of 1 percent of who has been voted for, and that is simply not enough to determine a winner. But Pelley says that Gungrich is projected, not determined, to be the winner. So it's an educated guess.

My response on the other thread:

You need to watch the whole video to get it. And explain to me how you can project a winner with less than one percent? At the time they projected Gingrich as the winner, Romney was LEADING.

And I don't know if you saw this part of the video or not, but they show that both CBS AND FOX show the same number of people they interviewed in their exit polls (2,831 I believe was the number) out of over 601,000 voters. How can you project the winner after interviewing such a minority?

Raoul76 · « **Reply #4 on:** February 14, 2012, 11:02:05 AM »

SpiritusSanctus said:

Quote

Did you watch the entire video? You can question what I know about statistics, but to make a statement like that, you either didn't watch the whole video or don't have a thorough understanding of what the NWO is and how they can rig votes. If you understand what the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr is and what their plans are, then you should also understand that they will NEVER let a man like Ron Paul win.

Lol, Spiritus, the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr is EMBODIED by Ron Paul.

Old World Order = Catholic monarchies
nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr = Americanized democracies

Ron Paul is simply selling a rehashed, idealized version of Americanized democracy, and what is worse, one that relies on an even more perfervid brand of economic liberalism, which is exactly what got us here in the first place. You think in a time when Apple is availing itself of the services of Chinese wage slaves that MORE economic liberalism is the way to go? Tell me, how do you see more jobs being created by that? He is selling an enormous lie, even more flagrant than other politicians. It is not more economic liberalism that is needed, but more PROTECTION, more TARIFFS, more PENALTIES for employers who hire Indians for half a rupee to be our online bankers, etc.

The neo-cons and libertarians are as destructive when it comes to the economy as the liberals are when it comes to morals. If Ron Paul claims he will make abortion illegal, it's at least something to vote for, but I would be extremely surprised if it actually happened. Republicans claim to be against abortion and do nothing to stop it. That is usually just a sop thrown to the Protestant electoral base.

Ron Paul's wife is an Eastern Star; women don't get into that organization unless their husbands are Masons. Ron Paul's function in the whole globalist scheme is to siphon the discontent of the paranoiac patriots, just like SSPX's function on the devil's war against the Church is to keep traditionals allied to the anti-Christ sect and thus buy more time for destruction. It isn't surprising you have fallen for Ron Paul because he is the political equivalent of SSPX -- another error, but one that is dressed up in a way that is more convincing to some people.

Think of news anchors. Some news anchors are airheads in short skirts and no one takes them seriously. Then you have someone like Walter Cronkite, who appears old and wise, intellectual and with integrity, Yoda-like, etc. But both of them are selling the same junk. It's all about appearances, that is how people are fooled. Ron Paul looks more serious than other candidates, he has a great image that is down-home and American but with European polish, so that he doesn't come off as international jet-set "pretentious" -- a great fear of Americans -- like John Kerry, nor as a boorish hick like George W. Bush. He certainly looks more credible than Sarah Palin in hooker boots. But he's not.

Yes, the system is rigged. It is rigged to give you an illusion of choice, so there is no need to rig votes, whether or not they do anyway. Wake me up when I can vote for a real Catholic who is not compromised by having to appeal to a media-brainwashed mob, then I might be interested.