You must be really popular with the ladies. You have a great personality, Mr. Rosenbaum. Perhaps you would be so kind as to give me some Yiddish lessons sometime?

Yes, it's a good summation of the sorry situation we all find ourselves in. The only thing Tradman omits—or rather, that I'd add—is that Trump seems to have relinquished his thinking capacity to his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Indeed, Kushner might as well be de facto president. Nothing that Trump has said or done in the past year has been consonant with the platform that won him the 2016 election. Together, Trump and Kushner have tossed into the trash every point of advantage that Biden and hαɾɾιs have handed them.

I think that this one aspect of the assessment overreaches. That is to say, whether it's correct or not hardly matters, because the great mass of those who plan to vote for Trump—even those at this website!—perceive him as the only rational choice in a situation where they see just one other option: a pair of candidates who rival Hillary Clinton for sheer wickedness and surpass her for stupidity. Please note that I write the foregoing as someone who hasn't voted since the great Gingrich betrayal of 1994 forever ripped the scales from my eyes.

For better or worse, however, abstaining from voting remains an alternative that has failed to acquire critical mass. Whether it ever will is something that might soon become a moot point if the Establishment's plans for societal disruption following an apparent Trump victory go forward in the manner that the alternative media have revealed. In other words, I am telling my seventy-five-year-old bones and sinews that they will have to acquire the flexibility needed to be a doomsday prepper!

This article is immediately discredited by the use of the term "lesser of two evils".  That is alien to the fundamental principles of Catholic moral theology.

It bases the opinion on the ramblings of a Modernist from the 1950s which makes no consideration regarding the principle of double effect, the only principle by which one can do something that has an unintended evil outcome, but argues from purely utilitarian principles.  One major flaw with Novus Ordo Watch is that they tend to subscribe to "Fifties-ism," believing that everything written before the magical year 1958 is automatically orthodox and authoritative, whereas the decay in Catholic theology was already far advanced by then.

Pace you and Ladislaus, however, it is not an un-Catholic idea. It is a category of choice that good Catholics confront virtually every day.

Can you give any examples of how Trump actually promoted LGBT crap?  I know he says he is the most LGBT president ever and he has waved the rainbow flag but that looks like just a lot of talk and no action.  He prevented govt paying for gender transitions.  He stopped the navy from modifying traditional military culture to accommodate gender-neutral terminology.  That's why sodomites hate him and vote Demonrat.  Planned Parenthood funding is not his fault.  He is pro-life.  He attended the pro-life rally in DC.  No other president has ever done that.  Mike Pence re-affirmed that position in the VP debate.  If PP funding increased, you can attribute that to the necessity of making deals both with Congressional Republicans and with the Demonrats.  If you don't make deals, you don't get anything done.  If you don't get anything done, you don't get re-elected.  There's only so much one man can do.  He is dependent on getting support both from Republican lawmakers as well as the general public.  If PP funding went up it is because jackasses are not voting for pro-life candidates that have a chance of winning.  Instead they want to pretend that they are above the fray and superior to the rest of us dolts who actually vote for viable candidates.