This is exactly the point I was making to you about your post which appeared to be passing moral judgement on someone not in lockstep with your opinion.
appeared to be...
Please retrace the exchange to
his September 2nd reply to
my post of April 10th (yes, April).
Our fellow felt the need to go back almost five months to a post that was a
re-paste of Trump's own words quoted in a sourced article titled, "Trump says he will not sign a national abortion ban if reelected."
This was his reply (emphasis added):
Your also being totally played... that's why you will always lose because you can't see how your being played. That question is a trick question, no matter how Trump answers it they will use it to divide and conquer, as you just have... thus you are their perfect patsy... as when you walk off the field the enemy claims it and they don't care at all about you, because your not a realistic threat to their wholesale slaughter... only Trump is with his base of pro-lifers... that's what scares them... they will use every trick in the book to throw us and Trump off course... remember, we just need to be moving forward, we can worry about the next battle after we win the current one.
How would you, Cera, answer that? Or is the above no big deal since a blind stampede toward Trump is all that matters, ends justifying the means? (BTW, just like you, I'm still registered in a so-called blue state, done deal no matter what you or I say or do.)
I did not pass moral judgement, nor did I demand compliance with my opinion. I did recommend, in detail, that he inform himself more carefully before alleging such things about other people.
If some other poster were to argue coherently with reference to actual facts and solid principles, ("solid" as in consistent with natural law and Traditional Catholic moral theology) then that person is free to hold a different political opinion. You see, I'm not much impressed by worldly bandwagons.
But if we're to be swamped by the likes of RobertS or whatever his next username will be (who you for some reason
seemed to favor) and josh (though he might sort himself out slowly) such that it takes scrolling and scrolling to find anything that isn't hasty sloppy shooting from the hip, well then, such is.