Can you docuмent the use of the word "transubstantiation" in the times of the Apostles?
No? Does that de-legitimize transubstantiation?
Issues get addressed in their own times.
This was precisely my point:
An earlier study posted by someone else in another thread was brusquely dismissed, simply because it was authored by a postconciliar moralist.
So my comment was designed to show that so far as I am aware, no traditional moralists have addressed the issue of the morality of MJ. Consequently, all we’re left with is the principles to be applied...by postconciliarists (which include all of us).
I liked the Thomistic article, not only because it is Thomistic, but because it tackles the issue with a more complete treatment than just the issue of intoxication (which is never the only circuмstance in evaluating the liceity of MJ: If it were, medical marijuana would often be deemed illicit in circuмstances in which it is clearly licit).