Author Topic: Thank you and goodbye (Read 53263 times)

Sede Catholic · « **Reply #405 on:** October 23, 2012, 09:47:55 PM »

Marcelino put me on ignore, because he is a gutless coward.

I wish he was man enough to face up to a response from me.

But he is a liar and a coward.

He was able to bully a frightened young girl.

But he was not man enough to face up to another man.

Tiffany · « **Reply #406 on:** October 24, 2012, 05:29:10 AM »

M was criticized for misusing the quote system, when PW did the same thing.
I do sign my posts in the anon forum, but when you quote from there, it shows up as guest. M was called out for allegedly manipulating quotes, but not PW? I did not state anything there I have not stated before, it doesn't matter, but PW did the same thing pages before him.

Sede read WF posts again. She hit the nail on the head. Many of us said nothing until PW started to devalue. I know I put her on ignore after thread I posted in with her, even after I was attacked, I did not speak up. When I saw she attacked WF is when I first spoke up.

Tiffany · « **Reply #407 on:** October 24, 2012, 05:39:25 AM »

Quote from: Sede Catholic

And their reasons were deeply personal, which was apparent to discerning members of CathInfo.

Sede this is silly, what could possibly be "deeply personal" reasons? It's the internet, could all be ex-sumo wrestlers in Tibetan monastery...

Cheryl · « **Reply #408 on:** October 24, 2012, 10:58:27 AM »

Are you by chance a misogynist?

Quote from: Sede Catholic

The other people here who persecuted PW were women.

And their reasons said more about them than about PW.

And their reasons were deeply personal, which was apparent to discerning members of CathInfo.

Yours, Sede Catholic.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #409 on:** October 24, 2012, 11:01:39 AM »

Quote from: Cheryl

Are you by chance a misogynist?

Because only misogynists see cattiness in a harsh light?

Matthew · « **Reply #410 on:** October 24, 2012, 11:08:08 AM »

Quote from: Tiffany

M was criticized for misusing the quote system, when PW did the same thing.
I do sign my posts in the anon forum, but when you quote from there, it shows up as guest. M was called out for allegedly manipulating quotes, but not PW? I did not state anything there I have not stated before, it doesn't matter, but PW did the same thing pages before him.

You're being ridiculous.

Filling in the name for an anonymous quote -- especially when that name was provided in the post itself -- is NOT the same as falsifying the quote itself!

I didn't ban Marcelino for "touching" the quotes, I banned him for maliciously distorting and changing the words of people's quotes -- putting words in people's mouths.

There is no rule against "summarizing" in a quote, taking out parts, adding bold or italics, or other incidental edits. The quotes are not some kind of sacred cow that can't be touched.

In short -- "Get real".

Marcelino actually put words in peoples' mouths. PW never did this.

Quit trying to defend the indefensible.

Cheryl · « **Reply #411 on:** October 24, 2012, 11:14:11 AM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote from: Cheryl

Are you by chance a misogynist?

Because only misogynists see cattiness in a harsh light?

Tele, what you saw as cattiness, was probably rule number one or two on the playground. Takes one to know one. Didn't anyone notice that all of those who agreed with PW were male? I wouldn't suggest anyone read, Men are from Mars, Woman are from Venus, but the woman on the forum saw PW in a way that the men did not. I wouldn't suggest going back and reading all the posts in this thread to count how many males for PW and how many against, but while I was recovering from a three week hospital stay I could see which way the wind was blowing. My reason for not posting at the time was because I was wacked out on pain meds.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #412 on:** October 24, 2012, 11:19:05 AM »

Quote

but the woman on the forum saw PW in a way that the men did not.

They seemed very much trying to ingratiate themselves with her but she showed an independent streak.

I think PW wishes she were accepted by the women here. I think it's a waste of time for her to post here. I would invite catherineofsienna to come back. Wallflower would do best to stay away from this forum.

As for Tiffany, I would ask her to be more cautious in her judgments.

MaterDominici · « **Reply #413 on:** October 24, 2012, 11:27:20 AM »

Quote from: Cheryl

Didn't anyone notice that all of those who agreed with PW were male?

I had no problems with PW, thought she was a good addition to the forum, and am certainly not a man.

Cheryl · « **Reply #414 on:** October 24, 2012, 11:31:26 AM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote
but the woman on the forum saw PW in a way that the men did not.

They seemed very much trying to ingratiate themselves with her but she showed an independent streak.

I think PW wishes she were accepted by the women here. I think it's a waste of time for her to post here. I would invite catherineofsienna to come back. Wallflower would do best to stay away from this forum.

As for Tiffany, I would ask her to be more cautious in her judgments.

Tele,

If you would like I could PM you how I saw the thread play out.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #415 on:** October 24, 2012, 11:41:29 AM »

Quote from: Cheryl

Quote from: Telesphorus
Quote
but the woman on the forum saw PW in a way that the men did not.

They seemed very much trying to ingratiate themselves with her but she showed an independent streak.

I think PW wishes she were accepted by the women here. I think it's a waste of time for her to post here. I would invite catherineofsienna to come back. Wallflower would do best to stay away from this forum.

As for Tiffany, I would ask her to be more cautious in her judgments.

Tele,

If you would like I could PM you how I saw the thread play out.

Sure.

PW is getting a lot of grief from her own friends and family for trying to become Traditionally Catholic.

It's rather sad that she's gotten such flack here.

Jaynek · « **Reply #416 on:** October 24, 2012, 12:20:53 PM »

Quote from: MaterDominici

Quote from: Cheryl
Didn't anyone notice that all of those who agreed with PW were male?

I had no problems with PW, thought she was a good addition to the forum, and am certainly not a man.

This is just what I was thinking. I like PW and I'm a woman. This is not a man/woman split. There are people of both sexes on both sides of this.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #417 on:** October 24, 2012, 12:21:57 PM »

Quote from: Cheryl

Quote from: Telesphorus
Quote from: Cheryl

Are you by chance a misogynist?

Because only misogynists see cattiness in a harsh light?

Tele, what you saw as cattiness, was probably rule number one or two on the playground. Takes one to know one. Didn't anyone notice that all of those who agreed with PW were male? I wouldn't suggest anyone read, Men are from Mars, Woman are from Venus, but the woman on the forum saw PW in a way that the men did not. I wouldn't suggest going back and reading all the posts in this thread to count how many males for PW and how many against, but while I was recovering from a three week hospital stay I could see which way the wind was blowing. My reason for not posting at the time was because I was wacked out on pain meds.

I am a lady and I defended PW all along.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #418 on:** October 24, 2012, 12:24:15 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote from: Cheryl

Are you by chance a misogynist?

Because only misogynists see cattiness in a harsh light?

Ouch.

What a revealing thread this has been!

Tiffany · « **Reply #419 on:** October 24, 2012, 01:03:56 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote from: Cheryl
Quote from: Telesphorus
Quote
but the woman on the forum saw PW in a way that the men did not.

They seemed very much trying to ingratiate themselves with her but she showed an independent streak.

I think PW wishes she were accepted by the women here. I think it's a waste of time for her to post here. I would invite catherineofsienna to come back. Wallflower would do best to stay away from this forum.

As for Tiffany, I would ask her to be more cautious in her judgments.

Tele,

If you would like I could PM you how I saw the thread play out.

Sure.

PW is getting a lot of grief from her own friends and family for trying to become Traditionally Catholic.

It's rather sad that she's gotten such flack here.

Nobody here is giving her flack for becoming a traditional Catholic. This is false blame.

My response to her needing support would be to call a traditional priest. I have talked to several through the years and they all have been very caring, kind, supportive, and greatly encouraged me. I'm sure if there was one within a few hours of her home he would make a trip to meet her. We have already been through that though with her lying about meeting with a trad priest, and not only did she do that but she made up a story about people in the chapel. She came out with a half apology only because she was called out on it.