Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Summary of Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit  (Read 1128 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LaramieHirsch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2718
  • Reputation: +956/-248
  • Gender: Male
    • h
Summary of Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit
« on: August 05, 2012, 02:34:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Introduction and Chapter One: The ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan

    Jones begins his book by discussing the nature of Logos, and what happens to a community that rejects Logos.  The fight against Logos is the main theme of this book. Consider the comparison of how England turned to the occult after they abandoned the Faith, and then recollect what happened with the Jєωs when they abandoned Christ. First, let's start with this, from page 70:

    Quote
    The Jєωs, who have abandoned the light of reason, the Logos, have no control over their passions. They will live in the darkness of unreason and, as a result, pursue their desires without restraint. They "are well represented by the figure of Barabbas," an ill-fated political ιnѕυrrєcтισnary. They are also identified with Judas, "and with him go to hell." The devil does not bother the Jєωs because "they have already fallen into his hands." He now attacks the Church. The Jєωs are agents of the devil who accuse Christians of credulity while persecuting them and blaspheming Christ. Jєωs are unjustly proud of their carnal descent from Abraham and refuse to repent. The Jєωs practice magic, and are "foolish, hard-hearted, wise only in doing evil, unable to know the hidden plan of God," and are "useless to society."


    What happened with the Jєωs is the result of rejecting Logos, rejecting Christ.

    But let's boil it down. What is Logos? Let's skip all the way back to page 19-20, and 23, where Jones defines it. (Emphasis is mine.)

    Quote
    Any individual Jєω, like anyone else, can choose to follow Logos. He may follow the "lower Logos" of the Natural Moral Law--i.e., the law that St Paul tells us is written in the hearts of men. That law, fully understood, leads ultimately to Christ and the Church He founded. We might call the latter the Higher Logos. Deliberate rejection of Logos is deliberate rejection of salvation. A spirit founded on rejection of Logos can only lead to disaster. True, people may be more or less ignorant--for all sorts of reasons--of Logos. But there is a special tragedy if a member of the Chosen people rejects what he or she was chosen for--as we see in the Gospels.

    Anyone can choose to reject Logos--all of us do this or are tempted to reject the lower Logos every day. But to have the rejection of the Higher Logos at the unavoidable core of one's religion or even as a determining factor of who is to count as a member of one's community means that a revolutionary spirit is entwined with that community.

    By revolution we mean revolution against Logos--the deepest kind of revolution. This Jєωιѕн revolutionary spirit is, as we have said, an internal (understood as above) enemy of Christianity. But so too are those Christian heresies that have, in one way or another attacked Christ, His Church, or the Natural Moral Law. Part of the history to be recounted in this book is the story of the relationship between the history of the Jєωs and the attacks on the Universal Church by Christian heretics linked to Jєωs or heavily influenced by Jєωs.

    ....This book then is the story of those movements that embody a spirit of rebellion (conscious or unconscious) against Logos, which more often than not meant an attack on Christ and His Church through history. This spirit is embodied not just in Judaism, but in numberous Christian heresies and secular movements.


    Okay, so, we get a definition of Logos, and basically a rejection of it is a path to disaster. If a community consistently and traditionally is in the habit of rejecting Logos, then that community is entwined with a revolutionary spirit against Logos. And at the end of the passage, we see that many other heresies and secular movements share this spirit of revolt against Logos. This would also encompass the occult movement of England in the mid-1500s, as well as the other peasant revolts covered so far in the book. In England's case, they reject Logos--as you put it, they turned away from Catholicism--and the result is that Dee, William Cecil, Queen Elizabeth, and the whole gaggle became proud of their carnality, and refuse to repent, just as it was with the Jєωs after they chose Barabbas instead of Christ.

    ---
    I like how Michael Jones sums up the Jєωs after Christ's resurrection:

    It is at this moment, some 30 years after the founding of the Church, that modern Judaism, Judaism as we know it, was born as essentially a debating society, because in the absence of a Temple, that was all that Jєωs could do. The results of these interminable debates became known as the тαℓмυd, which got written down over the next six centuries. The debating did nothing to eradicate the spirit of revolution from the Jєωιѕн mind, but in many ways intensified it by teaching the Jєωs to look for a military Messiah.

    I find this fascinating, because it calls to mind, for me, the Jєωs' lawyer-like nature when it came to the scriptures. They'd pour and pour over ancient docuмents, and twist the words to their liking to justify some of their practices. For example, a rabbi could call a demon if he wanted to, so long as he wasn't worshipping it. I mean, this just goes against Old Testament law AND common sense. They think they can "trap" demons, or something. It is easy to forget that the worship of God has always been a tradition, more than the sturdy adherence to a manual. And in this sense, I can see the resemblance of Jєωs with Muslims--since the Muslims, too, feel the Koran came from God Himself. In any event, that's just my impressions.

    ----
    Chapter 2: Julian the Apostate and the Doomed Temple

    This part on page 75 talks about Julian the Apostate's animosity toward the Christians. He wanted to team up with the Jєωs, rebuild the temple, and thus prove Christianity wrong once and for all. This was around the 300s or later, I believe. I know I've talked about the Apostate before, but I've never read this kind of detail from so many different sources.

    When they tried to rebuild the Temple, God had something to say about it.

    Eusebius:

    Quote
    "During the night, there arose a huge storm, the earth shook, and huge balls of fire burst forth from the ground and continued to do so through the next day. Instruments melted, workers were burnt to death, strange crosses appeared on clothes and bodies, a luminous cross shone in the sky, and the enterprise had to be abandoned. A violent tremor caused a portico to collapse killing a number of workers."


    St John Chrysostom:

    Quote
    Julian "overlooked nothing but worked quietly and a little at a time to bring the Jєωs to offer sacrifice; in this way he expected that it would be easy for them to go from sacrifice to the worship of idols." The emperor's construction crew was about to start construction of the temple, "when suddenly fire leaped forth from the foundations and completely consumed not only a great number of the workmen but even the stones piled up there to support the structure."


    Gregory of nαzιanzen:

    Quote
    the Jєωιѕн women "carried the dirt in their lap with no consideration for their robes and for the tenderness of their bodies, because they saw in all this a work of piety. .. but. . . a sudden whirlwind and the convulsion of the earth caused them to rush to a nearby church. . . as they reached the door of the church, which was open, suddenly those doors closed as if by an invisible hand, which filled with fear the impious and protest the devout. It is reported unanimously and held for certain that when they tried to open the door of the church, flames that burst forth from the inside prevented them from forcing the door open. The flames then burnt some and destroyed others. .. Still others lost various limbs of their bodies to the flames that burst from inside the church and burnt them to death."


    Chapter Three: Rome Discovers the тαℓмυd
    No notes…


    Chapter Four: False Conversion and the Inquisition

    Fascinating event that occurred, once it was discovered there was Jєωιѕн involvement in the Hussite/Taborite/Adamite Heresies (this is from page 195):

    Quote
    "During Holy Week, some Jєωs of Breslau had brobed a Polish peasant to break into the village church and steal a ciborium full of sacred hosts. As the peasant hurried through an open field on his way to rendezvous with those Jєωs, a thunderstorm struck. Seized with panic, he threw the ciborium away, but not before he removed ten or eleven hosts, which were taken via the wife of a soldier to the Jєωs in Breslau. Twenty Jєωs then assembled in their ѕуηαgσgυє and abused the hosts verbally and by assaulting them with whips and knives. When the Jєωs stabbed the host, blood spourted out of it a meter high. So much blood poured out of the desecrated hosts onto both perpetrator and bystander that the instruments of torture could not be cleansed and had to be disposed of in a nearby brook.

    "When the crime became known, the militia moved into the Jєωιѕн quarter and rounded up its inhabitants, interning them at the castle of King Ladislaus. Ladislaus ordered an investigation; during the investigation, Meyer, one of the main suspects in the case, committed ѕυιcιdє. According to Graetz's account, 'a Jєω by the name of Meyer ...who had bought a sacred host from a peasant, stabbed it, desecrated it, and distributed parts of it to Jєωιѕн communities in Schweidnitz, Liegnitz and elsewhere so that they could do likewise. It goes without saying that the wounded Host shed blood. This ridiculous fairy tale ...was of course widely believed. A number of Jєωs from Breslau were immediately thrown into jail.'

    "In May, Capistrano returned to Breslau. On June 14, the bishop, fearing innocent Jєωs might be implicated, asked Capistrano to investigate. Graetz's attitude is indicated by his use of the term 'fairy tale.' His sarcasm bespeaks an attempt to cover over sensational revelations that emerged during the trial but are unmentioned in his account. During the trial, a baptized Jєωess, the wife of a citizen of Breslau, accused her father of engaging in a similar ritual 16 years earlier. That Jєω had bought consecrated hosts from a woman and had then taken them to a cellar in Loewenberg, where he tried to burn them. Three times he threw the hosts into fire, and three times they leaped otu again, until an old Jєωess who had come to witness the desecration exclaimed that, having witnessed this miracle, she now believed in the God of the Christians. The Jєωs flew into a rage and murdered her on the spot. They then burned her body and buried it in the same place. The Jєωs then took the host, placed it on a small table, and cut it into four parts, causing it to bleed so profusely that neither table nor knife could be washed clean, so both had to be thrown into a nearby stream. The same woman also testified that a child had been murdered for ritual purposes in the cellar."



    -----

    Chapter 5: The Revolution Arrives in Europe

    Okay. In regards to chapter 5, which I keep trying to relate, I'll say again that the first 30 pages are an account dictating how the revolution of peasants unfolded, as radicals preached millenialist sermons--who Jones is trying to state are infected with the "Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit," though, he does not say it that way. And the last 20 pages of the chapter finally start talking about how there REALLY WAS Judaic involvement with the Hussites, so much so, that Jєωιѕн sources claim that King Wenceslas and John Huss actually converted to Judaism:

    Quote
    "The Jєωs felt the Hussites were ripe for conversion because, according to Jєωιѕн sources, King Wenceslas and John Huss had converted secretly to Judaism under Rabbi Avigdo Kara himself. According to the anonymous Jєωιѕн chronicler, King Wenceslas liked Kara and spoke with him often. Kara exploited this by subverting the King's faith, wearing him down 'until the King acknowledged that that man's [in Hebrew writing 'that man' refers to Jesus Christ] faith was false. After the King's death, there appeared a priest called Huss 'who attracted all the townsfolk and taught them the tru unity--Israel's faith.'"


    But I've just skipped ahead. Going back to the beginning ... The Hussite Wars / Bohemian Wars were a terrible cluster of war and cult madness that occurred in the 1400s. I think the whole incident lasted approximately 20-30 years or so. It was a precursor to the Protestant Reformation, and just like the Prot. Reform., the Hussite Rebellion started with the strong desires to loot the monasteries and grab secular control.

    Concerning the monasteries:

    Quote
    "The monasteries became wealthy in the mundane sense by ignoring wealth. The individual monks renounced money, but their labors produced enormous wealth for the monasteries. That wealth grew over generations because the monks did not have children or the expenses they require. More importantly, their lands were not constantly divided as children inherited the land from their fathers. The monks who had turned their backs on wealth ended up living lives of wealth, and wealth led to moral decay. The enemies of the Gospel used that moral decay to justify their attack on a supernatural way of life deeply repugnant to the carnal mind.

    "...

    "...Cohn claims that the resentment arising from poverty created the Hussite Revolution. Heymann disagrees; he says that largely because of laws designed to attract German settlers, the lot of the Bohemian peasant was significantly better than in the rest of Europe. "At no time again until the early 19th Century" were "Bohemia's peasants ... as relatively well off as in the period preceding the Hussite wars." Slavery, the engine that drove wages down, "had disappeared in Bohemia in the course of the 12th Century." Heymann contends the Church owned 50 percent of the land in Bohemia, and as such had an insurmountable advantage over peasants and the princes, who gradually united in resentment of monastic renunciation and the prosperity and moral laxity it engendered. The peasants, 'a revolutionary class' at Tabor, were unhappy because the wages the monks received, no matter what they did or did not do, were consistently highter than what the peasants and the proletariat could demand. Once the peasantry caught the millenial virus, no economic calculus was applicable, because what was then at stake was not better wages but heaven on earth. To the carnal and uneducated peasant, the destruction of the monasteries took on a numinous quality. Destruction of the monasteries, perhaps more than any theory about communion under both species, united the revolutionary movement."


    And of course, as the desire to loot monasteries grew, so did a sense of entitlement and greater religious worth--priests became heretical, and those who studied the writings of Wycliffe--namely John Huss--were the primary agitators. Angry sermons turned into lectures. Lectures turned into tavern meetings. Meetings turned into aroused crowds. Aroused crowds transformed into angry mobs. Angry mobs turned into raging armies of disorganization. And those disorganized "armies" turned into actual armies. Everyone marched forth with zeal, holding closely to Old Testament ideals. Somehow, the values of everyone got switched to the opposite of Christianity--just as Judaism is--and instead of partaking of the blood of Christ, it was necessary to shed the blood of sinners. (So much for turn the other cheek, mercy, and all that). Murder was rampant.

    Quote
    "Before long, the trajectory was predictable. the 'reformers' would urge a return to Scripture and the purity of the early Church, which would lead to a resurrection of figures from the Old Testament as models of how to use the sword to bring about heaven on earth. Vernacular editions of the bible (often falsified and published by Jєωs) were crucial, leading the Bohemians to think of themselves as a 'chosen race.' So, too, the Puritans in England and America, who, like 'Christian biblicists of every period,' felt a 'strong and immediate sense of identity with many figures in Jєωιѕн history.' Their study of the Bible prompted the Hussites to challenge the ordained priesthood and to see themsleves as Israelites reincarnated with a new mission from God. (John) Huss compared Czechs who would have nothing to do with Germans to 'the Jєωs whom Nehemiah forbade to intermarry with foreigners.' Citizens of Prague whose speech was 'half Bohemian, half German deserve[d] a whipping.' Huss closely 'sought to follow the example of the Hebrew prophet."


    By 1419, "The second coming of Christ was thus at hand, and Prague had a special role to play. The Holy Nation of Bohemia was going to inaugurate the millenium, Christ's reign, heaven on earth. The time had come for God's holy nation to grab the sword and bring on the millenium. Intoxicated by (sermons by John Zelivsky), the mob in Prague began to bring on the millenium by vandalizing images, often destroying whole churches, and beating up Catholic priests or monks unfortunate enough to be caught alone on the street."

    It really got crazy. Check out this bit:

    Quote
    "During the late spring and summer of 1419, as Wenceslas IV lost control of his capital city and his kingdom, the revolutionary priests staged blasphemous processions featuring bare breasted whores riding beasts symbolizing the Whore of Babylon from the book of Revelations. The rest of teh whore's body was covered with scrolls representing papal bulls and tiny bells that tinkled, in mockery of the bells rung during the concecration of the Mass. The riotous procession eventually wound its way to the New Town Square, where a fire was kindled and the bulls, stripped from the whore's body, were burnt in defiance. Festivals and processions of this sort, replete with obscenity and blasphemy, served as "visual and dramatic propaganda" that tended toward 'temporal subversion of the social order.' For a time, 'the world was turned upside down. The lecherous whore played the virgin or pope, the fool became bishop, the criminal donned the king's crown, the ass brayed at the altar, while everyone ran leaping through the cathedral singing uproariously the drunken liturgy."

    Mass gatherings on hills occurred throughout the summer of 1419, and E. Michael Jones likens these gathering to Woodstock. One particular hill they would gather on, the people renamed Tabor (like in the Bible), hence we got the term Taborites. Jones does a good job of describing how the whole movement got inflamed. Try to imagine a bunch of people at Falls Creek taking over the state, and later, a region of the country. That's what happened with the Bohemian people:

    "Tabor began not as a settlement but as a rally. To use a modern analogy, the settlement at Tabor was as if the people who attended Woodstock never left but instead created a community, which created an army, which conqurered the country, and then went on military forays into Canada and Mexico, too."


    I really think that last paragraph from the chapter sums a lot up about what happened during the whole conflict.

    There's a LOT of information in the chapter, as it is with everything that Jones writes. Particularly interesting and amusing is the appearence of a general that rose from the ranks, a guy named Zizka. This fellow had one eye. Later on, an arrow struck his good eye, and he was blinded completely at that point. Yet, blind, he kept directing his troops and followers, using his memory of the battlefield. What is amazing--absolutely amazing about Zizka--is the fact that the son of a gun never lost a battle. Ever. He used guns, learned how to pare down cavalry, and even transformed his wagons into mobile "tanks" that shot out artillery. Zizka is a legend, even if his cause was insane. Zizka is going to be someone I look up in my military history books, once I'm done with this book you've loaned me.

    ------

    Jones is not directly blaming Jєωs for the "Reformation." Reformation was obviously hatched from the minds of the clerics in that period. But Jones' argument is that the spirit of revolution in that time is the same spirit of revolution that traces back to the revolutionary Jєωs of Christ's time. That whole idea of subversion, and destroying the Logos--the moral order that Christ instituted through Peter--it was subverted and gnawed at by revolutionaries, just as it is today by Marxists and the like.

    Many quotations in the book are actually from Jєωιѕн scholars, and they actually admit to the Jєωιѕн involvement in the Lutheran Revolution, such as the printing of Bibles in the vernacular that were inaccurate, forwarding money to the "right" causes, and things like that.

    ------

    Chapter 6 – 8

    I found it very interesting that Jєωιѕн interests were involved in the heresies that churned and fomented the "Reformation." The Hussite Revolution alone was a fascinating read.

    To think, Czechoslovakian peasants were spreading heretical mania throughout Europe as far back as the 1420s. The entire fever laid the groundwork for Luther and his willing gang of lords and princes to abandon the Faith and lead the Continent into darkness.

    Of course, Jєωs were present amidst all of the heresy. Here's a bit from page 268 (which I read today):

    "The Jєωs became spies and propagandists for the Reformers, trafficking in corrupted translations of the Bible taken from Jєωιѕн scriptures:

    Quote
    "The most active intelligencers, liaison officers and propagandists of this international army were Jєωs. Only four years after Luther's first outburst, Cardinal Alexander, papal nuncio, reported that Jєωs were printing and circulating the German monk's books in Flanders. From the Netherlands they sent bibles even to Spain, concealed in double-bottomed wine-casks. In Ferrara, a great Jєωιѕн financial center, they printed heretical bibles for distribution in Italy and elsewhere. No less a person than Carranza, no languishing in the prisons of the Inquisition in Spain, said that this was the reason why the Church had to discourage the reading of the Bible in the vernacular, saving in approved versions. Even Jєωιѕн physicians and men of business were spies and propaganda agents. In the very year after Philip returned to Spain to stamp out Protestantism there, the Jєωιѕн Doctor Rodrigo Lopez, who was to find so unhappy an end in England, was passing over from Antwerp to London as a good Protestant."


    --------
    The main theme of that period, and its ties to the Judaics, is rooted in the verb Judaism. But just what is Judaism? Or, what is Judaism according to E. Michael Jones. At the moment, I think that Judaism is when people take the Bible, take the Old Testament, and get severely "old-fashioned" with restrictions and standards, to the point of extremism. But that's my guess as to the definition. I'm finishing up the chapter about the Anabaptist Rebellion. I told you about that Festival of Fools (look up on Youtube how it's portrayed in Disney's Hunchback of Notre Dame). Well, seems this town called Muenster, which became the seat of main rebellion for the Anabaptists, became a sort of constant Festival of Fools. The guy in charge there even proclaimed himself king of the world, the new King David of the New Jerusalem. While a whole lot of madness went on in that city, the Bishop of that area besieged the city with mercenaries and cannons, and he had to incur so much debt that the diocese ended up paying it back over a period of centuries.

    -------

    Chapter 9
    No notes

    Chapter 10: John Dee and Magic

    Is John Dee the father of gnostic occultism in England?
    I never thought about it that way. I mean, surely, he is the primary channel through which Cabbalistic occultism entered England. ...yeah. Yes, you could say that John Dee is the progenitor of gnostic occultism. At least for our current Epoch. No need to point to the druids, because they became irrelevant after the Roman legions settled into Albion.

    However, I would say that John Dee is NOT the father of occultism completely. As I summarized, he was trained by none other than Cornelius Agrippa. I'm sure you've heard of that guy--the famous alchemist? And Agrippa was taught by Reuchelin, who was in this big tit-for-tat public debate with the sincere converted Jєω, Pfefferkorn. Reuchelin was the mentor of Agrippa. But I forgot who Reuchelin's mentors were. I think this entire Protestant Revolt history of mentors and followers would make an interesting study in and of itself. But, of course, let us not forget who all of these people turned to ultimately for their source of the Caballa--the Jєωs. They're the ones who put the Caballa together, after all.

    In regards to magic, the English would have gone for anything. However whatever else a person is going for is ultimately Lucifer in the end. Look at it this way, the Judaics are the spiritual progeny of the Pharisees. And Jesus flat out told them that their father is Satan. And that's the only other choice, in the end.

    But Jones also stated it in this section of the chapter. "Jones notes the connection between Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and the тαℓмυd, and notes that if Christianity loses the will to contest the тαℓмυd, then the тαℓмυd will take over."

    So, basically, since the powers of England gave up the mind of Christendom and cut off from the main branch, their weakness allowed them to become judaized. Utopian thinking, messianic imperialism, occult leanings, usury...it's all in the spirit of the Pharisees.

    Quote
    Many have noted the connection between Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and тαℓмυdic Judaism. The тαℓмυd, with its "scurrilous and vindictive blasphemies against Christ" was "the chief means employed by the Annas and Caiaphas of each age to keep the mass of the Jєωιѕн people in ignorance of the true nature of Christianity, and to fan their misunderstanding of it to hatred." The moment Christianity lost the will to contest the тαℓмυd, that doctrine began to occupy the intellectual territory so badly defended by Scholasticism and the Humanists. Once Christians lost the will to contest it, judaizing was a natural consequence; the rise of the тαℓмυd in Christian culture was a function of that loss of will. The inordinate craving for the magic which Cabala dangled before the eyes of credulous Christians became the chief impediment to contesting the тαℓмυd. Why should these books be burned if they contained important information? Cabala was the Jєωιѕн version of the Albigensian importation of Gnostic thought onto European soil. The тαℓмυd and Cabala became the crucial link between the heresies defeated by the first Inquisition in the Middle Ages and Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, which took up the revolutionary banner after Europe tired of sectarian strife in the wake of the 30 Years War.

    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle


    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2718
    • Reputation: +956/-248
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Summary of Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit
    « Reply #1 on: August 05, 2012, 04:22:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm only posting all of this (from another thread), in order to keep a copy of the entire summary together in one thread on its own.  I'll continue the John Dee thread as a separate entity, because more can be discussed of that man outside of Jones' book.


    ++++



    Chapter 10: John Dee and Magic

    In this chapter, I go through it more thoroughly than the other chapters.  I am doing this because someone asked me to extract all the useful John Dee information.  So, chapter 10 is more of an explication than a summary.  I think this chapter is 90 pages long, and we are only halfway through it.

    I'm considering doing the same for the chapter about Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, which I believe is chapter 12.

    ---------------

    Okay, so, first the setup.

    The John Dee chapter starts off in England in the mid-1500s.  Jones describes how King Henry VIII and many powerful families in England managed to confiscate an enormous amount of wealth from the monasteries:

    Quote
    the loot went on at an appalling rate.  When [Edward] died and Mary came to the throne, it was nearly completed.  A mass of new families had arisen, wealthy out of all proportion to anything which the older England had known, and bound by a common interest to the older families which had joined in the grab.

    The money stolen from the Catholic monasteries was utilized to set up a system of usury, newly embraced by the new rulers of England, and the money was also used to supress Catholicism from ever rising again in England.  

    Now, this chapter about the English is different from the other few chapters before it.  Before, when we read about the different Protestant revolts throughout Europe, we see groups of people succuмbing to orgiastic dionysian parades, riots, long-winded justifications for lust and debauchery.  And all of these revots are violent, and have to be put down with a military hand because they are so crazy.  Jones refers to the actions of these groups (Hussites, Anabaptists, the Peasant Revolt) as judaizing, which means the act of taking Christians into behavior that is supposedly toward the Old Testament.  For example, the justification of polygamy, justified warfare from peasants, comparisons to King David--things which sound like what a cult leader today would preach.  

    However, England is different.  England is not so crazy as the previous examples.  England is sophisticated in its transformation.  

    Quote
    Together with the Cecils and the Russells, [Thomas] Gresham helped make England the model for the modern nation.  England would turn finance into a weapon more powerful than Philip's armies.  Revolution in Muenster meant communism; in England it meant capitalism.  As Marx understood, the beginning of capitalism was the theft of Church property.  The former wealth of the Church was put in the service of Mammon when the wealthy English families contested the Jєωιѕн monopoly on usury.
     
    ...

    Under Gresham's guidance England created the wretched proletariat for which it became infamous through ####ens' novels.  Under Gresham's leadership:

    "A whole class of decent Englishmen, of whom too little has been remembered in history, was swept off the church lands and doomed to poverty, vagabondageand often crime: mostly small farmers and farm laborers with their families, dispossessed because the new owners found it more profitable to raise sheep."


    Jєωιѕн involvement was obvious.  The English took Jєωs as their mentors.  Though they expelled the Jєωs officially in 1290, only 16,000 actually left.  The unprincipaled majority of Jєωs remained in England to subvert and poison and influence.  These were the marranos of England, and they provided a network for other Jєωs to return to England, and these returning Jєωs were disguised as Spanish, Portuguese, or Italian merchants.  

    Quote
    The Lobards, who practiced usury on Lombard Street in London, were probably crypto-Jєωs.  As in Spain, many English Jєωs went underground to preserve their fortunes.  When Jєωs expelled from Spain in 1492 joined them, the time was ripe for expansion of Jєωιѕн influence over English culture under the guise of the reformed faith.


    Jones cites Barbara Tuchman who noticed that England changed sometime during the 1500s, "...when the god of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob became the English God," and the "heroes of the Old Testament replaced the Catholic saints."  

    Jones cites Tuchman:

    Quote
    "With the Puritans came an invasion of Hebraism transmitted through the Old Testament."  Tuchman adverts to the notion that Scripture is a front for appetite, saying the Puritans "followed the letter of the Old Testament for the very reason that they saw their own faces reflected in it."  But she takes the idea no further.  Puritanism meant the end of Christian morality and the importation of "Jєωιѕн habits."  According to Cunningham, as cited by Tuchman, "The general tendancy of Puritanism was to discard Christian morality and to substitute Jєωιѕн habits in its stead."  The natural consequence was "retrogression to a lower type of social morality which showed itself at home and abroad."  The first manifestation of that moral retrogression was the widespread poverty characteristic of English life for centuries thereafter.


    Heresy, looting, usury, judaizing.  That seems to be the backdrop for our figure, John Dee.


    +++++

    A little bit more about England, mid 1500s.  

    The one thing I forgot to mention in the last post was that Mary, daughter of Catherine of Aragon and Henry VIII, was a Catholic who wanted to restore property to the Church.  She found no support, not even from her husband.  Her advisors did not support her either.  In 1555, she began burning heretics who were against the Catholic Church, but things in England had changed since the Inquisition, and "the enemies of the Church had grown much more sophisticated in psychological warfare."  About three hundred Englishmen died from her Inquisition.  

    On May 29, 1555, an arrest warrant for a particular secret Protestant cell was issued.  This cell had links to Mary's half-sister, Elizabeth.  One of the conspirators was John Dee.

    ...now we get to it.


    ---

    John Dee

    There is not much known about his religious background or early family life.  No information as to whether or not he was baptized.  Jones says this of him:

    Quote
    More than Tyndale's translation of the Bible, Dee is responsible for turning England into THE Judaizing nation par excellence: Dee created the philosophy that allowed England's new rulers to integrate their lust for gain, their judaizing, their imperialism, and their penchant for magic into a more or less coherent whole.  His enemies accused him of casting spells.  He did a horoscope of the royal wedding between Mary and Philip, and informants later claimed that, in casting that horoscope, Dee had "endeavored by enchantments to destroy Queen Mary."  His role ranged from casting horoscopes to assign propitious dates for momentous occasions, for example, Elizabeth's coronation, to advising on matters geographical and political.  By the time of his death in 1608, the tide of reaction was running against him, but by then he had left an indelible mark on what would become the world's premier Protestant empire and foremost promoter of revolution.  


    I found the following interesting:

    Quote
    While a student at Cambridge in 1546, Dee put on a performance of Aristophanes' play "Peace," during which a mechanical scarab beetle leapt off the stage in flight to the palace of Zeus.  No one could explain how Dee accomplished this.


    After Cambridge, Dee went to Mainland Europe to a few centers of learning.  He ended up in the Spanish Netherlands in a place called Louvain, where a lot of ideas collided together.  Think of Louvain as New York City's Greenwich Village of the 20th century.  Everything came together there, from Anabaptist thought, to radical Protestantism, to Renaissance science, navigational discoveries, and of course, Jєωιѕн Cabala.  

    Dee did not seem to have religious views.  Neither Protestant nor Catholic.  So, he fit well in either locale.  He could thrive among either Catholics or Protestants, since he did not have allegiance to either.  Jones proposes the supposition that Dee may have actually become a priest--though it is unclear--under the employment of Bishop Bonner.  This would make him a priest who practiced magic and uncanny arts, and Cardinal Allen suspected him of trafficking in spirits and double-dealing.

    According to Jones, Dee was a believer in an alternative to both Catholicism and Protestantism, the "occult philosophy in the Elizabethan Age."  

    Quote
    The clearest expression of his beliefs came later with publication of his Monas Hieroglyphica.  The Monad was his symbol for the key to understanding the universe.  It was intimately related to the language God spoke when He loosed the divine force that caused the universe to come into existence and then stay in orderly motion.  Magic, as Dee understood it, involved "the human ability to tap this force.  The better our understanding of the way it drives the universe, the more powerful the magic becomes.  In other words, magic is technology."  Neither Protestant nor Catholic, Dee believed in magic, and he was willing to work with whichever regme was willing to pay for his services...Magic determined his politics, which determined his religion.  


    Dee returned to England in 1522 and wrote, "Everywhere statues were destroyed in the churches.  The great crucifix ... on the altar of St. Paul's was a few days ago cast down by force of instruments, several men being wounded in the process and one killed...  There is not a single crucifix now remaining in the other churches."  Some acquaintances helped him to join the household of Northumberland that year.  He was an Inquisitor for Queen Mary until 1558, when Mary died.  Then, after that, his allegiance changed.  It came off that John Dee was not truly Catholic at all, but a double agent.  In May of 1555, when John Dee was arrested, it came out that "Dee was really working for Cecil and Elizabeth" all along.  Then, a little later, in order to prove he was actually working for the Protestant royalty, he used the stars and the queen's birthday to decide the date of the queen's coronation.

    +++++++++++++

    Jones takes another step out of John Dee’s life for a short segment, and returns to the world stage, setting the reader up for later developments in the chapter.

    A LOT happens in the world of John Dee.

    Jєωιѕн world conspiracy in Europe...

    And a lot happens around Europe with Jєωs. When the Spanish exiled the Jєωs from their country during their Inquisition, the Jєωs ended up relocating, and created perhaps the first world conspiracy network. Jєωs functioned as sophisticated spy networks that kept anti-Spain and anti-Catholic forces of the world informed about how to subvert Catholic Spain politically and militarily.

    Quote
    Several Spaniards later regretted the expulsion of Jєωιѕн financiers in 1492; in the seventeenth Century Spanish writers first claimed the growing wealth of countries like Holland was due to converso capital flowing into Amsterdam. Later, the mythical decline of Spain and the triumph of its enemies were blamed on the international Jєωιѕн conspiracy. Among the first to take this line was the poet Francisco de Quevedo, who claimed Jєωιѕн elders from all over Europe had held a meeting at Salonika, where they drew up secret plans against Christendom. Quevedo and others accused the count duke of Olivares of planning to invite the Jєωs back into Spain to undo all the consequences of 1492.


    Where did the Jєωs go to in order to spread their mischief?  Everywhere.  But Jones concentrates on about 6 areas: Antwerp in the Spanish Netherlands (or, just the Netherlands, as we know them today), Germany, Poland, Bohemia, Turkey, and Rome.  Back in Spain, since the Inquisition was so potently effective, the Jєωιѕн-supported heresies "took on a quietist tinge and became Illuminism" of the sort practiced by Gnostics and the earlier heretical Albegensians.

    But here is what happened in each of these areas:

    Spanish Netherlands: After the Spanish expulsion, the Jєωs moved here and perfected their skill in international trade.  They centralized in Antwerp, "whose citizens percieved the financial advantage of admitting these well-connected merchants."  Gradually, they built up a spy network throughout Europe with this new power.  They would come in to Antwerp posing as merchants, generally.  After controlling the spice trade, they would reinvest profits into the printing trade, and soon they were quickly printing out Protestant bibles.  At the end of the 1500s, they were able to throw off their "Catholic cloak" and form their own Jєωιѕн communities.  

    Germany: So-called "Catholic" Jєωs colluded with the German protestants.  Up in the north, Jєωs were able to expose themselves more, and they found an alliance with the Calvanist Protestants.  "Disaffected Catholics who had lived double lives as clerics now made common cause with the Jєωs who had led double lives after converting to Catholicism to preserve their wealth."  The Protestant-Jєωιѕн alliance was a "binary weapon," as Jones puts it.  Jєωιѕн wealth and expertise in finance and publishing aided the Calvanists and their protectors, the princes.  Cultural warfare was waged against the Catholic Church and Spain.  

    Poland: Jєωιѕн political influence increased, fueling eastern Polish imperialism.  It was a crime to be disobedient to predatory Jєωιѕн tax farmers.  Soon, "cultural drift in Poland led to an explosion of the sort the Inquisition prevented in Spain."  This led to Polish decline a century and a half later.  (I guess the Spanish Inquisition wasn't so bad after all, if it prevented Spain from the decline Poland experienced.)

    Bohemia: Jєωs were passing military intelligence to Turks to fight the Christians.  As a result, Austrian Hapsburgs banished all Jєωs from Bohemia.  The area was still red hot from Peasant Revolts, the Anabaptists, and the Hussite Rebellion--all rebellions were Jєωιѕн in nature, and all of these past incidents mixed too well with the Jєωιѕн sensibility to revolt against the Christian order of the time.  Hence, Jєωιѕн banishment.
     
    Turkey: Marranos from Spain and Portugal were secretly shipping arms to Turkey to assist the Muslims in their centuries long quest to destroy Christianity.
     
    Rome: On May 5, 1527, Lutheran German mercenaries sacked Rome.  Jєωs took it as if the messiah were coming.  The leader's name was Solomon Molkho; he was a marrano.  He was later burned at the stake in Italy in 1532.  This obvious and clear aggression against the Church has embarrassed Lutheran theologians ever since, and it opened the way for Calvanist influences, since Lutheranism was going to take a back seat from this point onward in the Protestant world.

    The response by the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V, was completely lackluster.  Jones really sums it up nicely when he quotes a historian named Walsh who said that "Charles seemd unaware, most of his life, that he was surrounded by the agents of an international conspiracy to destroy everything that his heart loved and revered."  Charles V's ignorant decisions led to the Jєωιѕн consolidation of power.  He promised the expelled Jєωιѕн conversos that they could settle in the Spanish Netherlands as long as they did not revert to Judaism or Judaize.  But they did it anyway.  They transformed Antwerp in to "the center of that commercial system which was soon to be superseded by a large international life ... a stately and egotistical city" which was then the center of the Jєωιѕн money power, driven from Spain three quarters of a century before.  Along the river were massive warehouses, stuffed with treasures from the eands of the earth."  It was with this kind of power that Jєωιѕн subversive powers were enabled to aid in the growing Calvinist plots, among others.  Charles V learned in 1545 that Marranos from Spain and Portugal were sending secret arms shipment to Turkey, and so four years later, Charles V, the Holy Roman Emperor, expelled the Marranos from Antwerp.  However, many of the Jєωs remained as Catholics, while others simply converted and ran over to England.  Yet:

    Quote
    Despite expelling the Jєωs from Antwerp, Charles was at a loss deciding how to deal with so subtle an enemy.  Perhaps passion clouded Charles' judgment.  According to Walsh, 'If the Emperor had put on the strong armor of sanctity which the Church, his wife and his conscience had often urged upon him the result might have been different, but a Charles dallying with lusty Barbara Blomberg between fits of gout and spurts of gluttony was no match for the Jєωs.


    Way to go Charles.  Thanks a million.  

    Church action, and Jєωιѕн-Protestant relations...

    The Council of Trent reconvened in 1561, though the English bishops were not there.  Queen Elizabeth, in good ol' persecution mode, was not allowing papal delegates in to the country to announce the council.  Nevertheless, the Church tied up 17 years of loose ends with the Council of Trent, and the council provided the church leaders with a blueprint that would help to reverse much of the damage of the last 100 years.  Jones describes how Pius IV "took a knife to his own household," and soon a Counter Reformation ensued.  Jesuits were working in the New World at this point, and much zeal was spread there.  We might also want to thank the Holy Virgin Mary for her appearence to the Aztecs at that time.  However, the seeds of Protestantism in Europe had taken root, and Jєωιѕн involvement was obvious to everyone.  

    This great passage I'm about to type is from page 341 of the book, and I thought the entire page was worth noting.  Statements in brackets are my additions for your further enlightenment.

    Quote
         The evidence that Protestantism was Judaizing was there for all to see.  Graetz and Newman [Jєωιѕн historians] agree the Jєωs played an important role in the Protestant revolt.  Walsh quotes Cabrera, a Spanish Marrano, who claims "most of the heresiarchs and heretics of this present Century have been of those people," i.e., the Jєωs.  "It is beyond question," he continues, citing another Jєωιѕн historian, that "the first leaders of the Protestant sects were called semi-Judaei, or half-Jєωs, in all parts of Europe," and "men of Jєωιѕн descent were as conspicuous among them as they had been among the Gnostics and would later be among the Communists."
         Luther, Zwingli, and Calvin were all students of Nicholas of Lyra, a Franciscan monk of Jєωιѕн descent who lived in the 14th Century.  Nicholas got his ideas from Raschi, who was teh conduit that allowed the тαℓмυdic scholarship of his father, Isaac of Troyes, to flow directly into Protestantism.  Reuchlin was another conduit [see chapter seven if you folks are interested in the Reuchlin topic; he was fascinated with the Cabala, and so he debated with a genuine Jєωιѕн convert named Pfefferkorn, and he justified Jєωιѕн books to the authorities.  Corruption won the day for Reuchlin].  When Pfefferkorn accused Reuchlin of being in the pay of the Jєωs to disseminate their propaganda, the essential truth of the charge caused Reuchlin to issue a violent denial in his pamphlet Augenspiegel.  Reuchlin's battle with the Cologne Dominicans was the diversion that allowed Luther to issue his 95 theses with impunity.  In each instance, Protestantism exhibited not an advance over Catholic thought, but "one long retrogression toward the moribund Judaism of the Pharisees of the time of Christ."
         Conversos waiting impatiently to throw off the pretext of Catholicism were in communion with the Jєωs throughout Europe and together they formed the nucleus for the coming international revolt.  Their skill in finance and printing made them powerful culture warriors who could influence events in ways their opponents had difficulty understanding, and they were quick to put these skills in the service of Messianic political movements.  The constant in Jєωιѕн participation in revolution from Simon bar Kokhba to Trotsky was not race but rejection of Christ.  Revolution was a theological project from its inception:

    It was their great tragedy that, having failed to understand Who Christ was, (the Jєωs) could not get rid of the messianic consciousness for which they had been chosen and consecrated.  Finding closed to them the only spiritual door to salvation, they were constantly driven to seek redemption in the here and now, in the resources of matter, in gold and power, in anything, anywhere but Christ.  When all their kindom had turned to dust in their patient hands, and the inevitable scourge of persecution came to scatter them again and again, they still followed leaders who kept them blind, and remained missionaries of what Saint John called "the spirit that dissolves Christ."

         Many of the Jєωs expelled from Spain and Portugal fled to cities in France.  Many more made their way to the Spanish Netherlands, where Charles allowed them to flourish.  Lucien Wolf claims large numbers of English Protestants--"and doubtless the most active in propaganda and organization" --were Jєωs who had become Calvinists in Antwerp where they were active in the Protestant movement and "had given up their mask of Catholicism for a not less hollow pretense of Calvinism."  There was a natural affinity between the Calvinists and the Jєωs.  Both were "enemies of Rome, Spain and the Inquisition."  And Calvinism was a form of Christianity similar to Judaism in its attitude toward idolatry and the law.  As a result, the Jєωs "became zealous and valuable allies of the Calvanists."


    Now we turn back to John Dee's England, aka "Perfidious Albion"...

    Apparently, Elizabeth enacted a reign of terror against Catholics in England that I, as an American, was not aware of.  

    The first act of Parliament under her abolished the spiritual jurisdiction and authority of the pope in England; this was called the Act of Supremacy.  Its design was to eradicate the Catholic faith from England.  Next, Parliament abolished the Mass, making it a criminal offense to say or hear it.  All spiritual jurisdiction belonged to the Queen, and an English citizen had to attend the new worship or suffer fines.  Those who refused the new worship were refusers who often were martyred.  English bishops did not assent to this, so they were replaced with political opportunists.  Those new evil bishops then replaced the loyal Catholic clergy with corrupt clergy.

    Queen Elizabeth was becoming a tool of William Cecil a politician, and her advisor, the founder of the Cecil dynasty.  The inactivity of the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, and later Philip II, emboldened Cecil and others like him to hold onto the stolen Catholic monastery treasuries, and they were emboldened to put forth their activism in England.  Later in 1559, John Knox returned to Scotland, and after collaborating with Elizabeth's advisor, Cecil, they bought off the Scottish nobility with money stolen from Catholic monasteries, and soon Scotlant had banished the Catholic Faith.  Mass attendance became a capital crime, and Mary, Queen of Scots, "became a prisoner in her own country."  

    With all of Europe in Protestant upheaval, Cecil felt emboldened to antagonize the Holy Roman Emperor.  Soon, Elizabeth was in charge of an anti-Catholic crusade.  Soon, it seemed as if there were no difference between being English and being Protestant.  Elizabeth sought to "press th eadvantage of the 'invisible kingdom of opposition.'"  Queen Elizabeth:

    Quote
    sent emissaries to the kings of Denmark and Sweden, the princes of Germany and the rulers of Switzerland "and all States alienated from the Catholic Church," proposing a league "not only for the defense of their religion but for its propagation and to so much for the security of their own affairs as to cause trouble and detriment to the Crown of France."  To dispose men's minds to this effect she sent four English preachers, four Germans and one Frenchman, from England to Germany, who, feigning to be moved by religious zeal and ardor, went to visit many cities and princes, sometimes themselves preaching what they thought might most facilitate their object, and sometimes making the local preachers perform the office."


    ++++++++++++++++

    The next part in the John Dee chapter gets real exciting.  We will see references to a bit of our traditional literature, as well as witness foreshadoing of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.  Jones even talks about the Templars a bit, but I'm having trouble pinning down their relevance in this chapter.  

    - - - - -


    It starts off after Elizabeth's coronation in 1559.  After that moment, John Dee heads back to the European Continent.  He learns Hebrew, though it is unknown who teaches him.  Why learn Hebrew?  So that he can intimately study the Cabala in order to practice magic.  Hebrew was not taught at the university, and Hebrew was not taught by the rabbis in England.  So it is likely he learned Hebrew in the Spanish Netherlands.
     
    Someone familiar with Cabalistic magic was seen as the ideal man of that era, strangely enough.  Jones states that Elizabeth's advisor William Cecil sent John Dee to the Continent to learn the Cabala, because both believed Cabala was "the cutting edge of the new science and the new intelligence technology."  Instead of learning about essences for the sake of truth, "Cabala delivered tangible results like gold and power."
     
    Here, Jones will quote a lot from a Frances A. Yates, who wrote The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan Age.  Yates maintained that Dee was the characteristic philosopher of his age.  John Dee would have received this quality from his experiences with Cornelius Agrippa (a student of Reuchlin, it so happens).  Yes, John Dee was acquaintanced with the famous Cornelius Agrippa, the alchemist who was obsessed by the Philosopher's Stone.  And indeed, Agrippa was a student of of the same Reuchlin who had debated and argued his cause with authorities in order to justify his practice of the Cabala.  Reuchlin wrote his first book on Cabala in 1492, the year Jєωs were expelled from Spain, and the same year Columbus found America.

    Quote
    Jєωs brought the Cabala directly to England, helping to form that nation into one heavily influenced by Judaism.  With such influences, Dee intended to break away from the "Middle Ages" mindset.  Yates considers Dee a brilliant mathematician and geographer who believed he was an ardent reformed Christian who conjured angels.  Yates calls Dee a "Christian Cabalist," though it becomes clear that Dee is actually involved in Judaizing.  Jones says that "Cabala, not Tyndale's translation of the bible, marked the beginning of England as the philosemitic nation.  Cabala was the lens through which Dee saw all of the trends the new government was interested in, from usury to "intelligence," thus redefining what the now Protestant country would promote."


    The Mass was gone.  What England was left with was imperialism, magic, usury, and occult science.

    "Dee's is certainly following Agrippa's outline in the De occulta philosophia and that was a work founded on Renaissance Magic and Cabala.  Also he hints in the Preface at higher secrets which he is not here revealing, probably the secrets of angel-magic."  Dee's Christian Cabala would link the messianic politics of the Hussites and Anabaptists with the cabalistic arcana of Renaissance magic, and out of that marriage England would emerge as the messianic Protestant nation.  Its main literary propagandist in the Elizabethan age would be Edmund Spenser.  John Milton followed the lead of Edmund Spenser, and Milton would become the literary propagandist for the Puritan age.  The common denominator shared by messianic politics and renaissance magic was тαℓмυdic Judaism, which sank its tenacious tendrils into English soil.


    The Protestants of John Dee's time believed that they were justified and clear to practice their magic.  To them, "Christian Cabala" was not a euphanism for judaizing Protestantism.  Rather, "Christian Cabala" meant good white magic.  John Dee insisted he only spoke with good angels during his conjurings.  Dee was allowed to continue on believing this sort of thing because Catholicism was banned from England.  "This conviction was at the centre of Dee's belief in his angelic guidance, and it explains his pained surprise when alarmed and angry contemporaries persisted in branding him as a wicked conjurer of devils" (Yates).  But the Catholic position has always been that if a man attempts to summon angels, only fallen angels will respond, and then only if he puts his soul in jepordy.  

    Michael Jones discusses how Yates considers Dee's angel summoning activities are interlinked with his mathematic skill, but Jones retorts that John Dee's mathematic skill was in spite of his angel-summoning.  

    Science and Magick, with John Dee...

    Quote
    The change in thought in England that Dee promised through Cabala was not unlike what Karl Marx promised 300 years later.  Before men used philosophy to describe the world, but now Dee, as master of Cabala, would change the world through magic.  The principle was simple: Hebrew was the language spoken by God himself.  It was by the divine word that the world came into being and continued to function.  So any man who knew those words could bend the universe to serve his will, just as God could.  One technique was known as Gematria, which involved learning the numerical significance of Hebrew words, each letter of which had a numerical value.  Cabala was related to the Pythagorean idea that reality was ultimately number.  But another feature of Cabala was its preoccupation with angels.  Copernicus' De Revolutionibus appeared in 1643, but Dee was still living in a universe in which things were in motion because an intelligent spirit was moving them.  The spirits that moved the stars and planets were known as angels.  One preoccupation of Cabala was learning the names of angels, as well as figuring out just how many there were (301,655,172, according to one set of calculations).  If a man, through magic, could learn their names, he could, like God, comnmand them to do his bidding.  According to contemporary thought--thought which Dee accepted completely--the Heavenly bodies determined the existence of minerals in the earth.  The fact that Mercury was both a planet and an element was just one indication of this correspondence.  The moon was silver.  The sun corresponded naturally to gold, and so gold was normally found in the tropics, where the sun was strongest.  By learning the names of the angels who moved planets like the sun, Dee would become the master of the elements, able to change lead into gold, as well as the master of intelligence, able to send messages (aggelos meant messenger) back and forth without cipher.  Dee would actually come up with a way of using angels as a form of communication.  In an age when the King of Spain, England's archenemy, owned the gold mines of the new world, all of this had political and military implications, which is most certainly why Dee went to the continent to learn тαℓмυdic technology and most probably why he went there as Cecil's agent.


    In this book, Jones discusses the difference between magic and prayer.  Basically, magic is a parody of prayer.  Prayer is a supplication, while magic is a command.  "The point of magic is to do away with man's precarious position as supplicant and place him in a god-like position of command.  Men could not order around angels.  Yet, if you learned the Cabala, and if you could order angels around, you become tempted to feel superior to the angels.  

    John Dee's world of magic, and the Freemasons...

    Jones traces sources of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ's origin to a man named Sir Thomas Sackville, who was the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge at York.  When Elizabeth caught Sackville's secret meetings, it is thought he brought the queen into the club.  "A pattern emerged: the leading Protestants were the leading Masons ... The Magnates in England all began as Protestants and ended up as Masons when the revolutionary spirit leapt like a spark from the Protestants to the Masons at the time of the Restoration."

    Jones notes the connection between Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and the тαℓмυd, and notes that if Christianity loses the will to contest the тαℓмυd, then the тαℓмυd will take over.  

    He also notes how a diffuse Gnosticism took over the Knights Templar.  This sort of thinking was different from the spread of magick in England.  Yet, the Freemasons like to make a lot of hay over the Templars, and this is evident in later centuries:

    Quote
    When the King of France suppressed the Knights Templar and brought about the death of Jacques (James) De Molay, it looked as though a tradition had ended.  And in the ordinary sense it had.  But, as Peter Parker in The Murdered Magician notes, the tradition was to be fancifully resurrected.  He points out that: "The transformation of ideas about the Templars during the eighteenth century shows how far from stern scientific rationalism the men of the Enlightenment could wander.  In the very body of Church history which was the prime target for rationalisation and demystification, eighteenth-century men found the Templars, and turned them into a wild fantasy...".  And there were no greater promoters of this "wild fantasy" than the Freemasons.  The history of gnosticism, Cabala, тαℓмυd, the Protestant revolt and the Masonic lodges were self-consciously (if not historically) intertwined by eighteenth-century meen opposed to the Church.  Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ was always a messianic political movement, an explicit alternative to Catholicism bound up with the rituals of Judaism and Jєωιѕн symbolism.  The adept must travel toward the east toward Jerusalem to find Enlightenment; he is going to rebuild the Temple and he is going to find a lost world.


    Later, during the 1600s, occult Protestantism became formalized as Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.  Jones quotes Rabbi Benamozegh--Jєωιѕн rabbi, folks--"It is quite certain, Masonic theology is at root nothing else than Theosophy, and that it corresponds to the theology of the Kaballah."
     
     
     
    John Dee in Literature and Culture...

    +Shakespeare deals with the good and bad changes that Dee had brought into Western Civilization.  
     
    -The "good" qualities of Dee's transformational culture:
         -the Renaissance man is the English Magus
         -such an English Magus appears in the Tempest and Midsummer Night's Dream, each full of magic
         -Prospero was modeled on Dee; Prospero's island kingdom was "the new occult Protestant England"
     
    - The bad changes:  
         -the occult philosopher, such as Dee, was saturnine--a characteristic shared with Jєωs
         -the occult philosopher was melancholy because of the deep insights occult philosophy gave him
         -Hamlet was a dramatic representation of the occult philosopher
     
    +Durer famously etched Melancholy as a pictoral representation

    +John Milton followed the lead of Edmund Spenser, and Milton would become the literary propagandist for the Puritan age.  The common denominator shared by messianic politics and renaissance magic was тαℓмυdic Judaism, which sank its tenacious tendrils into English soil.

    (Now, in regards to Milton, I will tell you that I have studied that man.  John Milton is the author for the famous poem, Paradise Lost, which is absolutely fantastic.  I love it.  Milton does his best to describe angelic warfare, and not surprisingly, John Dee was a likely influence in Milton's inspiration.  Two angels I immediately think of are Uriel, the fourth Archangel, who we stopped acknowledging shortly after Nicea, and then there is Abdiel, who is a protagonist angel hero who the reader can focus on in the midst of the battle for Heaven.  Perhaps, after we finish going through Jones' chapter on John Dee, I can provide some supplemental information about Dee and his influences on Milton, from the book Milton and the Angels.)

    + Christopher Marlowe stated the orthodox position about angel/demon summoning--that you will only summon demons--in his work Dr. Faustus.  In Faustus, he attacks "Dee's cultural hegemony over the new 'England' Dee had created."  Dr. Faustus is known to say: "Tis Magick, Magick that hath ravish'd me."

    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle