Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Stevus, I saw your thread over at angelqueen has been locked by serv  (Read 841 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Stevus, I saw your thread over at angelqueen has been locked by servitum after only 8 replies. That place is neo-con trad central.

Stevus, I saw your thread over at angelqueen has been locked by serv
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2009, 10:06:19 PM »
Yes, I found it very odd, but I'm not sure what the reason was. If they had a rule saying it shouldn't be discussed, I wasn't aware of it and had no ill intention.

One St. Domenic speculated that it might be a carryover from my "previous forum" which is ridiculous since the quote came from a completely different website where the matter was being discussed. I intentionally did not use the name of the website or the poster (who I had never had a discussion with before anyway).

In any case I hope that was not the reason it was locked. I don't think it was. I think perhaps the issue has simply caused riots on the forum before that I was not aware of. We'll see what serv says.

I must say I am disappointed that I will never get my much desired input on this problem from the posters on AQ, a majority of whom I respect.

In any case, I will gladly post the thread here where I know we can discuss freely. I'll put it in the "Crisis" section.

I'd be interested to hear your input!


Stevus, I saw your thread over at angelqueen has been locked by serv
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2009, 11:45:39 PM »
It was probably locked since the issue has been debated there a lot.

Stevus, I saw your thread over at angelqueen has been locked by serv
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2009, 03:17:55 PM »
You are correct. Serv responded...

Quote
You didn't break any rule, nor was any of the other issues you mentioned a factor. In fact the lock is no reflection on you whatsoever.

I just wasn't in the mood for another pants thread. They always become a moderation headache in a way that is so highly disproportionate to the significance of the issue. Those threads never end well.


Fair enough. I'm excited to discuss the issue here though.