Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: PG banned for Schism and or Heresy  (Read 3841 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
PG banned for Schism and or Heresy
« on: June 03, 2018, 01:33:17 PM »
PG has made his vocal opinion very clear, namely: that he doesn't consider St. Thomas Aquinas or St. Louis de Montfort to be saints. This is not an acceptable position or belief for a Catholic in good standing.

As the CathInfo Rule #1 states: "In necessary things, unity."

The saints canonized before Vatican II are NOT open for debate, nor do they fall under Rule #2: "in doubtful things, liberty".

I've made it clear many times that CathInfo is a place for TRADITIONAL Catholics -- those who left their parishes sometime AFTER Vatican II's changes were implemented, with the aim of keeping the Faith, and adhering to pre-Vatican 2 practices, liturgy, morality, customs, etc.

CathInfo is not a place for Old Catholics, protestants, Orthodox or any other general malcontents, schismatics or heretics who HAPPEN to have a problem with the mainstream Conciliar Church but for a completely different reason!

Anyone who thinks the Church Crisis began at Vatican I (like the Old Catholics), 1000 or more years ago (like the Protestant heretics), etc. is not welcome here. To such demonically proud walking tragedies I say: Take your cocky "I'm the last Catholic" home-alone ___ out of here, and I don't really care if the door hits you on the way out!

Just because a person is (for example) involved in a family (internal) dispute with his mother about an inheritance, money, etc. doesn't mean he'd make common ground with people who called his mother a whore. He wouldn't stand for it.

It's simple, really. We Traditional Catholics never left the Church. The various heretics and schismatics, including the Old Catholics, *did leave*. No wonder we Traditional Catholics don't get along with the Church's various enemies, with their multitude of different heresies and refusal to submit to the One True Church.

Let's put it this way, with a sci-fi hypothetical:
If you woke up tomorrow and found yourself in 1950, but you still wouldn't submit to the Church's canonizations of various saints, various acts of the Magisterium, various dogmas, the authority of the Pope, etc. then you really have to leave CathInfo. This is a board for Traditional Catholics. Traditional Catholicism started in the 1960's, not before. (Before then, it was the same Faith of course, but we didn't need the "Traditional" adjective.)
Logged

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: PG banned for Schism and or Heresy
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2018, 01:40:31 PM »
P.S.

It should go without saying that it gives me no pleasure, but only much sadness, to have to ban someone for a reason like this.

1. Disdain for the great Apostle of Our Lady is not exactly the best signal of a person's heading for heaven...
2. PG has obviously been contaminated by liberalism and other worldly ideas. He had some strange ideas about veganism, eating "unclean" meat, etc. although he was less extreme than "Truth is Eternal" who I recently banned.
3. And he turned against SAINT Thomas Aquinas because the latter said that the Death Penalty was a worthy punishment for heretics. He is happy to "disagree" with the Angelic Doctor, whose writings were chosen by the Catholic Church to teach its priests, bishops, cardinals and popes their Philosophy and Theology from 1300 until right before Vatican II. So apparently PG has absorbed some of the modern/liberal/PC/Novus Ordo attitude towards the death penalty.

Long story short, it's a sad situation, but I have to enforce the rules on CathInfo.
Logged

Offline Last Tradhican

Re: PG banned for Schism and or Heresy
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2018, 01:41:18 PM »
Quote
PG has made his vocal opinion very clear, namely: that he doesn't consider St. Thomas Aquinas or St. Louis de Montfort to be saints.
I never bothered with him, I concluded that he was just a person seeking to be identified as a guru who discover something that no one else had. The St. Louis de Montfort "discovery" was typical of that type of person.
Logged

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: PG banned for Schism and or Heresy
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2018, 01:43:32 PM »
Quote from: Last Tradhican on June 03, 2018, 01:41:18 PM
I never bothered with him, I concluded that he was just a person seeking to be identified as a guru who discover something that no one else had. The St. Louis de Montfort "discovery" was typical of that type of person.

Such wannabe "gurus" are obviously extremely proud, in a way that isn't even very subtle. I have seen others though. These types want to be the only one who discovered this or that. They want to be special.

Their mom didn't give them enough hugs as a boy, or something.
Logged

Offline Maria Regina

Re: PG banned for Schism and or Heresy
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2018, 03:52:03 PM »
Quote from: Last Tradhican on June 03, 2018, 01:41:18 PM
I never bothered with him, I concluded that he was just a person seeking to be identified as a guru who discover something that no one else had. The St. Louis de Montfort "discovery" was typical of that type of person.
Yes, I was somewhat confused about PG's "St. Louis de Montfort 'discovery.'" Glad that you, Matthew and Last Tradhican, have clarified this.

Is that thread about PG's discovery still available to be read at CathInfo? If so, it should be deleted lest someone else be tainted with his heresy.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
« previous next »