You referenced this book on my curse of Ham thread.
In my investigation of the curse of Ham I found that St. Ephraem the Syrian, who was made a Doctor of the Church in 1920, is the only notable Catholic before the 19th century who promoted the curse of Ham as applying to blacks.
Fr. Meagher may have been influenced by the тαℓмυd.
In the past I've speculated that Matthew allows Poche's membership because Poche spikes activity and/or Poche provides Catholics an opportunity to sharpen their wits to Jew lies.
JayneK has yet, as far as I know, to inform her Jєωιѕн family members of the great news that the h0Ɩ0cαųst didn't happen. Perhaps 2Vermont would like to inform her Jєωιѕн family members as well.
It should be fantastic news to a Jew that the h0Ɩ0cαųst didn't happen. One would think they would shout if from the rooftops.
Hello
rum, nice to exchange posts with you for the first time.
Kindly, may I ask you a personal favour? Would you refrain from posting what may lead this thread astray? I have recently converted and I am studying the Catholic religion. This platform offers me the opportunity to obtain valuable replies to doubts and questions but, if these replies become buried among irrelevant posts, the thread looses part of its usefulness.
We all suffer because jews killed our Lord, we all agree that it is false religion and we all experienced use of the h0Ɩ0cαųst for reasons other than legitimate.
But it is not helpful to attack those who converted from judaism, only because they have not managed to convert their families, as much as it would not be helpful to attack me, who just converted from reformists religion, only because I have not managed to convert my family.
I even hold that, in our generation, reformists have done more harm to the Church than jews.
More to the point, what are your opinions on the roots of our Catholic Mass? Are they rooted in pre-Pentecost judaism?