CathInfo.com

Here is the post that tipped me off to this story:

The indications are overwhelming, in my opinion, that Eric Gajewski (Tradcatknight) purchases Twitter followers, YouTube Subscribers, and probably also Facebook likes. One can actually purchase Twitter followers, etc. for not much money. I believe that after purchasing Twitter followers, etc., Gajewski then constantly asks for donations so that he can purchase more followers and 'grow his numbers,' creating the appearance of a large following when one actually doesn't exist.

He allegedly has 306 thousand Twitter followers (that's a joke), and he's following over 200 thousand Twitter accounts! It's not at all plausible, and numerous other facts reveal what he's doing.

It's a deception. Since his 'numbers' are largely, if not almost completely, purchased or the result of advertising, they don't reflect how many people actually care about, consistently listen to, or follow what he has to say ---- or how many are being impacted in a real and lasting way. His number of real listeners or viewers is probably almost none or very few. He also has almost no quality or high-quality content by which they would be impacted. It's mainly just him talking or re-posting videos of others.

Indeed, his almost unique and made-up theological position would also not be conducive to generating the large following he claims to have. He's a little blogger with an almost unique theological position ---- that is, he condemns sedevacantism, he condemns the SSPX, he condemns the Fraternity of St. Peter, he condemns the Novus Ordo, he condemns Francis as a non-pope but holds Benedict XVI to be the pope. That's a basically unique position that almost no one agrees with and which appeals to almost no one. So, why would many listen to or care about what he has to say, unless he were producing unique or high-quality content, or were known for theological expertise, knowledge, or research (such as in the areas of Church history or apologetics or the current situation, etc.), which he's not.

I also believe he purchases YouTube views. It can be done for only a penny a piece for each video view. That's why on many of his programs (especially older ones) he doesn't even have 1000 views after months, yet on some others he will have tens of thousands of views after a few days. There isn't a consistency of large viewership because he doesn't have a large viewership. (In the last few weeks, however, there's been more consistency. That's almost certainly because he's been receiving perhaps a few donations from gullible people, which enables him to purchase views for all the recent videos. I've also saved screenshots of many of his videos which, after many months, only have a few hundred views --- in case he goes back after seeing this and tries to purchase views for those videos so that it's not as obvious to people what he is doing). With probably almost no exceptions, he only gets big numbers when he pays for them. And then, based on his big numbers, he asks for more money to pay for more big numbers.

I believe the man is a fraud and it's sad that any 'traditionalist' would be so gullible as to fall for his ruse or support it, not to mention his doctrinal problems.

Eric Gajewski asks for donations, which is highly irregular for a layman. He apparently uses his occasional "windfalls" to purchase followers on his social media accounts (Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, etc.) to appear to be super-popular and the 900-pound gorilla in the Trad world.

Well, the jig is up. We now have proof that he buys followers. Has ANYONE actually clicked on his follower list, rather than merely being dazzled by his follower list? I did it just now, and let me tell you it was an extremely eye-opening experience! There is seriously a 0% chance that these are all true followers, as defined by individuals who follow his blog (etc.), interested in hearing what he has to say.

Now any of his fans (do they actually exist?) please tell me: Is it even POSSIBLE that these people would agree with any of Eric Gajewski's positions -- ANY OF THEM?

But don't believe me, click the link to Twitter and see for yourself!

Some of his followers, picked at random:
https://twitter.com/TradCatKnight/followers


Dina
@bella2241
Proud Die Hard Conservative - Pro-Life/Israel Cruz 2016

OrgasmicSweetPotato
@orgsweetpotato
I dig organic food, orgasm & the outdoors. A huge fan of orgasmic meditation, sitting meditation, tech & hippy-dippy stuff. Mostly paleo &…

**PORN PICTURE**
Sexy xXx Pics
@SexyxXxPictures

Mariana Griffin
@sebewufugily
►Buy Instagram Followers LOW PRICE - Only $39 Per 1,000 IG Followers - Limited Offer, Here ( Visit my website on Twitter Profile ⬇) http://bit.ly/1YOd4XH

Salim Atandi
@SalimAtandi

Avinash singh
@aviva962

Sorin Belciugan
@belsorin1

sam tsipnis
@samtsipnis
Big heart, huge ****, and ***** the size of mangoes! Comedian that follows back, and who alsooo follows from the front!

belkis ocarroll
@belkisexn73

Courthney Hopkins
@Arthy0315
Loves to Party em' | Atlanta #TeamSexy

**PORN PICTURE**
pretty little things
@annaslovers
take me home

V. M. Black
@VMBlackAuthor
NY Times Bestselling author of the Aethereal Bonds series--new adult vampire paranormal urban fantasy. First one FREE on Amazon: http://amzn.to/1ol6MvB

**PORN PICTURE**
Esperanza
@Esperanza2pj
One day hope to become the next Ariana Grande or Selena Gomez

Hill Jobs
@hilljobs
The Leading Source for Capitol Hill Jobs

BlojiGarGar
@blojigar

Future Cougar
@MsAmbitchous
**** pants. My spirit animal is GIR. I can't even. #SugarHillPocketGang #Whovian #ALLONSY


Does he think we're STUPID? Give me a break. Eric Gajewski is a charletan and a fraud. Case closed.

Eric Gajewski asks for donations, which is highly irregular for a layman.

Unless, of course, you're Gerry Matatics or Thomas Droleskey.  

I'm not saying either of these two are frauds, just that they are laymen who often ask for donations.

I was just looking at his forum. It is very small and most of the posts are by Gajewski himself.