Author Topic: Commemorating Ground Zero (Read 1394 times)

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #5 on:** September 10, 2012, 06:54:00 PM »

Quote from: Marye

Thank you for this great information. Again, I like your writings!

You're welcome, Marye.

We should all thank Matthew, because he is the one who provides this opportunity

for us. Where would we be able to say these things if not for CathInfo?

Just try and do this on most other sites, you'd be banned.

In some countries, you would be thrown in prison.

And they would then lose the key.

On purpose........

:scared2:

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #6 on:** September 11, 2012, 09:27:11 AM »

Here we are.

9-11 has arrived.................

songbird · « **Reply #7 on:** September 11, 2012, 09:59:05 PM »

Read the book by Judy Woods, "Where did the towers Go!" Poof! She has many things to say about Hutchison and Tesla discoveries of energies that we are not familiar with. What can melt iron, and rust steel in seconds? Rescue people in black clouds, lifted up in the air in tornados. And HAARP is mentioned in regards to the Hurricane that day. Many things to read about and pictures galore. The book may need to be ordered, my friend ordered hers.

Belloc · « **Reply #8 on:** September 12, 2012, 02:05:24 PM »

Quote from: alaric

911 has morphed into a religion, like the h0Ɩ0cαųst ™.

You can not question the offical party line.

It is sacrilege.

its now called Patriot's Day.......yet another holiday of the ACR

Loriann · « **Reply #9 on:** September 12, 2012, 03:40:07 PM »

Quote from: Neil Obstat

Quote from: alaric
911 has morphed into a religion, like the h0Ɩ0cαųst ™.

You can not question the offical party line.

It is sacrilege.

I hear what you're saying. But I like to think that something can be done about it.
I really don't want to roll over and play dead when the adversary gains the upper hand.

There seems to be some movement in the right direction:

New 9/11 truth docuмentary among 'most watched' on PBS this week

PDF Print E-mail
Written by Victoria N. Alexander, DigitalJournal.com
Wednesday, 05 September 2012 09:33

http://video.cpt12.org/video/2270078138

"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" is getting public attention and casting doubt on the scientific validity of the U.S. government's investigation into the WTC tragedy. PBS is the first major network to air the program.

Just days away from the 11th anniversary of the World Trade Center tragedy and months away from the U.S. presidential election, a game-changing 9/11 docuмentary is ranking number three among "most watched" docuмentaries on PBS and number one among "most shared." Available for free online August 18th - September 4th, the docuмentary could have a significant effect on public opinion. [Update: PBS has extended viewing indefinitely.] Both the Republicans and Democrats, as equally staunch defenders of the official story, stand to be affected if the public's suspicion of government corruption grows deeper.

An earlier report on Digital Journal found that the claims made in the docuмentary can be verified by reading the government reports themselves. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the government agency charged with the investigation, did not provide any data -- no measurements or estimates -- of the mass or energy that would be required to bring down the buildings in about ten seconds. Normally a scientific report would present all the data that is used to construct a theory. The omission of data is a red flag to anyone familiar with scientific procedure. It appears that the investigators may have intentionally produced reports that the scientific community would reject.

According to the experts appearing in Explosive Evidence, the scientific community did reject the reports immediately, but it has taken a very long time for this message to reach the public. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the producers of the docuмentary, have been trying to educate the public for a number of years. The PBS broadcast of their work represents a major step forward for them.

See full article at http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/332051 >>

I will look forward to watching that.