(Tractus Missæ Salve Sancta Parens)
Monday, October 9, 2006This message can be downloaded in PDF format from our website http://www.virgo-maria.org/ .Anaphora of Addaï & Mari : the scandalous teaching of apostate Rome taken up by the Fraternity of Saint Peter and rejected by Bishop Fellay
A grotesque lecture by a professor from the Pontifical Oriental Institute (Rome) on Nov. 18, 2005
Bishop Fellay himself on November 22, 2004 questioned this teaching taken up in Wigratzbad (FSSP)
We have just received from the Rore Sanctifica International Committee the following press release that we are happy to publish.
Beginning of Rore Sanctifica's press release
Press release from the Rore Sanctifica International Committee
We are examining the text of a conference by Professor Giraudo of the Pontifical Oriental Institute (IPO) in Rome. This conference was given in Paris on November 18, 2005, at the Protestant Institute of Theology, within the framework of a colloquium on Syriac liturgies, a meeting organized by the Society of Syriac Studies.
Let us remember that the anaphora (Eucharistic prayer) of Addai and Mari comes from a rite of schismatic Chaldeans, and that it does not contain the words of the consecration .
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, chaired by Father Ratzinger, recognized on January 17, 2001 this anaphora as “being able to be used as valid” , without even the words of the consecration appearing in it. Which amounts to saying, in a simple way, that modernist Rome recognized as valid a Mass without sacramental form. Here is one of the statements of the text approved by Father Ratzinger:
“The words of the Institution of the Eucharist are in fact present in the anaphora of Addai and Mari, not in the form of a coherent and ad litteram narration , but in a eucological and disseminated way , that is to say -to say that they are integrated into the prayers of thanksgiving, praise and intercession that follow ”
The IPO professor contrasts the methodology of the sacramental theology of the 1 st millennium in the Church to that of the 2 nd millennium. He reduces the Tradition of the Church in this matter to the teaching of Peter Lombard and considers it to be conjunctural and ignoring the various archetypes of anaphora.
It is based on Baumstarck, himself the inspiration for Dom Botte and the agents of the liturgical movement launched by Dom Beauduin. Following them, he invents an "embolistic dynamic" (that is to say, provided with a literary graft) and attaches it to the anaphora of Addai and Mari. And he goes on to claim that "the Addai anaphora represents the story (of the institution of the Eucharist) in its embryonic state" and that "a story of the institution is 'in germ' in the Addai anaphora. " And concludes:
“Our research on the literary structure of the covenant prayer resulted in the intermediate notion of quasi-embolism, quasi-graft, QUASI-RÉCIT, to describe the germinal state of the insertion of the account of the institution. It is good to note that this same notion is taken up again by the Commentary to the Roman Docuмent published in L'Osservatore Romano of October 26, 2001, which is expressed as follows: “All these elements constitute a QUASI- STORY of the Eucharistic Institution.
Finally, let us not forget that, in this specific case , the merit of having made theology evolve goes to the liturgy , according to an ecuмenical pastoral body ! "
Giraudo, November 18, 2005, Paris
This recognition is motivated by the antichrist ecuмenism pursued by the Vatican . It also has the effect of going against what the Catholic Church has always done so far in sacramental matters. Such a negation of Tradition constitutes a first milestone in the direction of the questioning of the declaration of the invalidity of the Anglican Orders promulgated infallibly by Leo XIII in 1896 ( Apostolicae Curae ).
On November 22, 2004, at Saint Thomas Becket Church, Oregon, United States, Bishop Fellay had already condemned this position of Rome, designating it as one of the reasons for his disagreement with Rome at the time. . He had revealed that a professor of liturgy at the seminary of Wigratzbad (Fraternity of St. Peter in Germany) was a former student of the current Pontifical Oriental Institute in Rome and that he taught the seminarians of the FSSP the sacramental validity of the Addai and Mari anaphora.
We know that Doctor Barth who organizes liturgical colloquia in Germany (eminent member of the German network which secretly directs the SSPX), colloquiums to which Bishop Fellay is assiduous , has produced (with Mr Mersch) a considerable amount of work in order to refute the publications which tended to recognize a sacramental validity in the anaphora of Addai and Mari.
Also, in the interest of the defense of the Catholic faith of the faithful, we ask Bishop Fellay to publish or put online on the Internet, all the works and sources collected by Doctor Barth on this question.
We hope for a response from Bishop Fellay in this direction.
October 8, 2006
Rore Sanctifica International Committee
End of Rore Sanctifica press release
We can only be scandalized by such a conference which reflects the frightening level of apostasy and fallacy to which teaching in the Pontifical Institutes has fallen.
A Father Hanssens, a Jesuit, author of a very scientific work (1959 and 1970) on the alleged Apostolic Tradition falsely attributed to Hippolytus of Rome , as revealed by the work of Rore, would have been devastated before such a collapse. [1] Why does Bishop Fellay, who thus rejects the false teaching of the apostate Rome of Ratzinger and the Fraternity of Saint Peter on the alleged sacramental validity of the anaphora of Addai and Mari, no longer raise this question publicly?
Why, on the contrary, does he focus all his action and his speech as a priority on the “ authorization ” of the Mass of Saint Pius V?
Why DOES HE OBSTINUALLY REFUSE TO ASK FIRST the question of the validity of consecrators without which there can be no valid Mass, and without which the faithful are deprived of the sacraments?
Everyone understands that to preserve the golden eggs, it is first and foremost necessary to preserve the goose that lays the golden eggs!
THEN WHY Mgr FELLAY, WHO CLAIMS EVERYWHERE TO WANT TO SAVE SACRIFICE (the Golden Eggs that are the Catholic Masses according to the Tridentine rite), DOES HE OBSTAIN TO REFUSE TO EVOKE FIRST AND FIRST THEN THE SACRAMENTAL VALIDITY OF THE PRIESTHOOD (The only hen capable of laying these golden eggs which are the valid Catholic Mass and Sacraments)?
Could it therefore be that after twelve months of attempts to reconcile with Ratzinger, Bishop Fellay would no longer accept his public statements of November 22, 2004? Bishop Fellay asks the Institute of the Good Shepherd if it accepts the validity of Addaï and Mari's anaphora? So many questions that come in addition to that of the validity of episcopal consecrations since 1968 and on which it is absolutely necessary to obtain an answer from the superior of the SSPX. Will Bishop Fellay start by responding to the above invitation from the Rore Sanctifica Committee ?
Bishop FELLAY really cares that the faithful have VALID Catholic Masses and sacraments? DOES HE REALLY CARE ABOUT THE SALVATION OF THE FAITHFUL [2] ? Let's keep up the good fight
Abbot Michel Marchiset
Extract from the Osservatore Romano of October 26, 2001, page 7
and quoted by Giraudo in his conference of November 18, 2005 in Paris
"[...] The main question for the Catholic Church [...] concerned the problem of the validity of the Eucharist celebrated with the anaphora of Addai and Mari, one of the three anaphors traditionally in use in the Church. 'Assyrian Church of the East. The anaphora of Addai and Mari is singular in that, since time immemorial, it has been used without an account of the Institution.
The Catholic Church, knowing that she considers the words of the Eucharistic Institution as an integral and therefore indispensable part of the anaphora or Eucharistic prayer, has conducted a long and in-depth study of the anaphora of Addai and Mari d ' a historical perspective, liturgical and theological, after which, on 17 January 2001, the Congregation for thy Doctrine of the Faith is concluded that this anaphora can be considered valid. His Holiness Pope John Paul approved this decision.
The conclusion in question rests on three main arguments.
3. Finally, the words of the Institution of the Eucharist are in fact present in the anaphora of Addai and Mari, not in the form of a coherent and ad litteram narration , but in a eucological and disseminated way, that is . that is, they are integrated into the prayers of thanksgiving, praise and intercession that follow [...] ”(published in L Osservatore Romano of October 26, 2001, p. 7).
____________
Topic: THE CONSECRATION OF ADDAI AND MARI--- SUBJECTIVISM (Read 492 times)