All of Europe would have been swallowed up by the nαzιs. Perhaps much of the rest of the world as well.  However, that is only one problem with the OP.  Suggesting that The Pope saving lives, any lives, is somehow evil is at best stupid, and more likely malicious.  Hence malevolent fool.

Hitler tried with all his might to  not hurt the British Empire, he never wanted war with England.  
And swallowed up?  You mean instead having half be communist and half non Christian countries?  As opposed to a regime which got rid of pornography and indecent shows, banned transgenderism, banned masonic societies, banned abortion, had the greatest and most just catholic economy known to man, supported ethnocentric countries, banned liberalism and communism.  
You are the fool, read some books.  
Quit being a brainwashed moron.  

Actually Pope Pius X presided over an ecuмenical meeting when he had that interview with Herzl.

That was no ecuмenical meeting, you slanderous baboon.  That was an audience he granted to Herzl.  Talking with a non-Catholic is not the same as an ecuмenical meeting.  Stop trying to tar and feather St. Pius X as some kind of precursor to the Vatican II heresiarchs.

This was the audience at which St. Pius X REJECTED Herzl's plea that the Vatican support the Jews' retaking of the Holy Land.

St. Pius X:

Yes, but we, and I as the head of the Church, cannot do this. There are two possibilities. Either the Jews will cling to their faith and continue to await the Messiah who, for us, has already appeared. In that case they will be denying the divinity of Jesus and we cannot help them. Or else they will go there without any religion, and then we can be even less favorable to them.

The Jєωιѕн religion was the foundation of our own; but it was superseded by the teachings of Christ, and we cannot concede it any further validity. The Jews, who ought to have been the first to acknowledge Jesus Christ, have not done so to this day.

Would Bergoglio ever say such a thing ... or even Pius XII for that matter?

She is a horrible and untrustworthy authoress. She claimed that many popes were Freemasons and that Pope Pius IX was a Freemason. This had been refuted in his own lifetime and he was greatly offended by the accusation. She used Freemasonic writers to back up her claim instead of using Catholic authors. I wouldn’t touch her trashy books with a ten foot pole.

Unfortunately, there is a fair bit of truth in there.  It's a shame that it's blended in with the falsehoods.

It does make me wonder - was John XXIII even that bad a pope? I always assumed so because of the circuмstances of his election and his convocation of Vatican 2, but come to think of it I don't know of any particular things he did that were bad for the Church. He did call for Vatican 2, but it was barely open when he died and it seems to me that most of the innovations and talk of ecuмenism came after Paul VI took charge. Perhaps Vatican 2 would've taken a different course under John for all I know, but that's the thing - I don't. So I'm wondering if someone here could give a breakdown of the good and bad things he did in his pontificate.

The SSPX uses the missal of 1962, the missal that was promulgated by Pope John XXIII.

The nαzιs against the Communists is like Satan against Satan.

Not true! nαzιs were fighting evil from all sides and did not start the war. They had every right to defend their country and people. Patton said we were fighting the wrong enemy!