Fuentes really destroyed Tucker. 

Tucker is a world class sociopath. 

Fuentes really destroyed Tucker.

Tucker is a world class sociopath.

How did he "destroy" Tucker?  And why would he?  What is the purpose of Fuentes actions? What is the overall good? And why is Tucker a sociopath? It's wise to understand the Jєωιѕн question for sure, but not everyone believes that shoving it down the public's throat is the answer.

To be fair Fuentes has often identified himself as being in Group 2 as seen below.

03:30 Group 1: Free Spirits
06:00 Group 2: Involuntary Single People
08:27 Don't lower your standards for marriage
11:06 Group 3: Those who choose single life

Yes, I've heard him say so. But if its involuntary, why does he mock relationships so much? Why is he so disrespectful towards women? Why does he equate being with a woman as being gαy? Yes, he loves his shock value, and yes, I get the meaning behind those words, but when you take what he says - and the way he says it - as a whole, you are left with the impression he is choosing single life - not because it is the higher calling for Christ - but because it suits him - "He arn't going to be told by no woman!" I believe that's a fair assumption given the personae he puts forward.

Fuentes is a master at sleuthing and elucidation. He really exposed Tucker as the CIA spook that he is. 

Fuentes is a master at sleuthing and elucidation. He really exposed Tucker as the CIA spook that he is.

Newbie accounts warrant suspicion that banned bad actors are trying to resurrect themselves.

Fuentes here has a true understanding of who Christ is and an ability to transmit it in clarity.
Again who else is even touching these fundamentals of Truth in the secular world?

https://x.com/i/status/1953216927821619537

With all due respect, while most of what Fuentes says is true, his explanation is not all that clear in places and implies a separation between the two covenants. His opening lines state that the new testament replaces the theology of the Old Testament. This is incorrect. Said Christ "Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil." Matt.5:17.  Fuentes also speaks of the Old Testament having Rabbis. This is misleading. It was a sacrificial priesthood and completely different from Rabbis of today. As Fuentes does correctly state, everything in the Old Testament was symbolic of the New: Christ was the Law, Our Lady was the Ark of the Covenant that carried the Law, Christ was the sacrificial Lamb, and the Temple of the Holy Ghost.  Everything that made up the Old Law was elevated - not changed -to a divine level including the  priesthood, and Israel itself. Yes, the new Israel is the Catholic Church made up of Christians who historically would have come form the all the lost and dispersed tribes of Israel. That is why Christ said there is no (longer) Jew nor gentile.