https://rumble.com/v6x2fjg-exposing-tucker-carlson.html?e9s=src_v1_cmd%2Csrc_v1_ucp_aJust finished listening to this. The first thing I noticed - and was waiting for - was the proof to back up Fuentes claim that Tucker had lied about not knowing his father was working for the CIA. Fuentes claims he lied about this twice. Yet all we have is Fuentes word. No proof. So having established Tucker as a "liar" in the mind of his viewers, Fuentes then goes on to remind everyone that Tucker used to work as a broadcaster for Fox News which he paints one of "the mouths of Israel". So, having painted Tucker as a suspect character from the outset, Fuentes then goes on a monologue about how the 2020 election was rigged and stolen from Trump, how all the Republican's were complicit in this theft, and how Tucker did nothing to defend Trump. Fuentes then moves on to Joe Kent (a conservative Trump supporter). He tells us that he rang up Joe Kent and offered him his services on helping get him into office. Fuentes said he would pull out all stops for him but on the condition that Kent never disavowed him publicly. Again we only have Fuentes word that Kent agree to this or that this condition was even mentioned. Or that any sort conversation took place between them. Needless to say, Joe Kent did publicly distance himself from Fuentes stating that his version of 'American First' was different to Fuentes' who was openly anti-Israel. Fuentes, true to form, went on the defensive to publicly attack Joe Kent stating that he - and Tucker - have "a race-blind, pro-Israeli view of the world" and were "fundamentally pro-Israel".
Just finished listening to this. The first thing I noticed - and was waiting for - was the proof to back up Fuentes claim that Tucker had lied about not knowing his father was working for the CIA. Fuentes claims he lied about this twice. Yet all we have is Fuentes word. No proof. So having established Tucker as a "liar" in the mind of his viewers, Fuentes then goes on to remind everyone that Tucker used to work as a broadcaster for Fox News which he paints one of "the mouths of Israel". So, having painted Tucker as a suspect character from the outset, Fuentes then goes on a monologue about how the 2020 election was rigged and stolen from Trump, how all the Republican's were complicit in this theft, and how Tucker did nothing to defend Trump. Fuentes then moves on to Joe Kent (a conservative Trump supporter). He tells us that he rang up Joe Kent and offered him his services on helping get him into office. Fuentes said he would pull out all stops for him but on the condition that Kent never disavowed him publicly. Again we only have Fuentes word that Kent agree to this or that this condition was even mentioned. Or that any sort conversation took place between them. Needless to say, Joe Kent did publicly distance himself from Fuentes stating that his version of 'American First' was different to Fuentes' who was openly anti-Israel. Fuentes, true to form, went on the defensive to publicly attack Joe Kent stating that he - and Tucker - have "a race-blind, pro-Israeli view of the world" and were "fundamentally pro-Israel".Great post. Thank you.
Maybe it's always about him because it is usually just him that is shut down, debanked and cancelled , where as all of the other "truthers" and "anti-neocons" tend to function very comfortably- wonder why that is?I think Fuentes a spoilt brat but if he is right about Tucker lying, I'd be interested in investigating that more. Can you post a link to the Putin/Tucker interview where he states Tucker was refused entrance into the CIA. And how did you know that Tucker's father was a member of the CIA?
The fact is is that everyone knew for years that Kent, Bannon and the sort are CIA gatekeepers for Israel and that Tucker's father was a spook- I even knew his father was CIA last year and Putin even exposed during his "Tucker" interview that Tucker himself was refused entrance into the CIA, and now he is saying he didn't know that his father was CIA until his death in May 2025?
Very very unlikely, with Tucker living in the midst and a part of the DC monster and in establishment (CIA) media all of his life.
I think Fuentes a spoilt brat but if he is right about Tucker lying, I'd be interested in investigating that more. Can you post a link to the Putin/Tucker interview where he states Tucker was refused entrance into the CIA. And how did you know that Tucker's father was a member of the CIA?Putin on Tucker applying to CIA: https://youtu.be/fOCWBhuDdDo?t=2770 (https://youtu.be/fOCWBhuDdDo?t=2770)
The fact is is that everyone knew for years that Kent, Bannon and the sort are CIA gatekeepers for Israel and that Tucker's father was a spook- I even knew his father was CIA last year and Putin even exposed during his "Tucker" interview that Tucker himself was refused entrance into the CIA, and now he is saying he didn't know that his father was CIA until his death in May 2025?https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1951414213047402571
CathInfo.com is useless by allowing this member, "soft pillow," to turbo-posting.They are all accounts probably created by jws to mimic people who are genuinely anti-jwish, so as to lead people who are genuinely anti-jwish astray. As the jw Paul Gottfried (who is often credited with creating the term "alt-right") once said, "White nationalism can be good for jws."
Matthew, the owner, needs to rethink the purpose of this "forum."
We can all learn about Nick Fuentes and other celebrities elsewhere. I look for post about hidden stories.
If any of you want to learn a thing or two about the celebs you are so infatuated with you should give this Bitchute channel a look-see:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/sfx54RMm3xJZ
You'll learn from watching these videos that all of your "alt-right" heroes are total frauds and gatekeepers. It's depressing that I need to tell people who claim to be Catholic, and claim to be anti-jdaism, such an obvious thing.
He's got some doozies on Fuentes.
They are all accounts probably created by jws to mimic people who are genuinely anti-jwish, so as to lead people who are genuinely anti-jwish astray. As the jw Paul Gottfried (who is often credited with creating the term "alt-right") once said, "White nationalism can be good for jws."The link won't work for me - Warning comes up - Incitement to Hatred. Can you give us a summary of what is being said about Fuentes? Should we be worried and why?
Jws know how to pretend to be anti-jwish. Most pro-white groups are run by cryptos. But those Catholics with discernment can tell the difference.
To quote myself:
The link won't work for me - Warning comes up - Incitement to Hatred. Can you give us a summary of what is being said about Fuentes? Should we be worried and why?Typical double-mindedness about jws, which is what one would expect from a jw pretending to be anti-jwish. But you can get that link working just fine. Don't bore me.
Typical double-mindedness about jws, which is what one would expect from a jw pretending to be anti-jwish. But you can get that link working just fine. Don't bore me.I have never heard of Fuentes until fanboys began posting on here. My gut instinct tells me he has some deep seated issues hence why I was interested. As for the link, it genuinely won't let me in, but I am so sorry that I bore you so much and it is so much trouble for you to even answer civilly. Just glad you're not my neighbour.
Check my archive and you'll see me linking to specific videos which out Fuentes. Not that he would need outing, to anyone with a decent Catholic, or even pagan, moral sense.
I have never heard of Fuentes until fanboys began posting on here. My gut instinct tells me he has some deep seated issues hence why I was interested. As for the link, it genuinely won't let me in, but I am so sorry that I bore you so much and it is so much trouble for you to even answer civilly. Just glad you're not my neighbour.It may be that the website is banned by the country you are in.
It may be that the website is banned by the country you are in.Thank you, I think you are right. A warning comes up with the words in bold 'Incitement to Hatred'. No freedom of speech this side of the Atlantic I'm afraid.
I have never heard of Fuentes ....My gut instinct tells me he has some deep seated issues:facepalm: :laugh1: :laugh2: :jester: :confused: In what world does this make any sense? You've never heard of "person A" but your gut tells you that "they have issues".
It may be that the website is banned by the country you are in.Another possibility is that the website has "parental controls" which prohibit swearing, cussing, etc.
:facepalm: :laugh1: :laugh2: :jester: :confused: In what world does this make any sense? You've never heard of "person A" but your gut tells you that "they have issues".She meant that she never heard of him until she listened to the entire clip that she summarized in Post #3. From that post she had a gut reaction that something is not quite right with Nick (my guess is his lack of humility, but maybe we are just so used to soft men, that a confident man sounds strange. I don't know.)
1. If you've never heard of person A, how do you even know what they've said?
2. If you've never heard person A talk, how have you verified if they are wrong?
3. If you don't know if person A is wrong consistently, how can you tell they "have issues"?
You're either 1) lying about not-knowing Fuentes, or 2) you're pre-judging him based on...gossip.
This is the dumbest post i've ever read on this site.
She meant that ...my guess is...but maybe....i don't know...:laugh1::laugh2::laugh1::laugh2::laugh1::laugh2: You don't know what she meant.
What do Fuentes' fans think about his confusion regarding his sɛҳuąƖity?
Controlled opposition Nick Fuentes says ‘Having Sex with Women is gαy’
https://www.politicalflare.com/2022/05/white-nationalist-maga-leader-and-incel-nick-fuentes-says-having-sex-with-women-is-g (https://www.politicalflare.com/2022/05/white-nationalist-maga-leader-and-incel-nick-fuentes-says-having-sex-with-women-is-g)αy/
. . .
“I think if anything [being an incel] it makes me less gαy. If anything, it makes me not gαy as opposed to less gαy, not that there’s any gαy, but it makes me not gαy.
“If we’re really being honest, never having a girlfriend, never having sex with a woman really makes you more heterosɛҳuąƖ because honestly, dating women is gαy, having sex with women is gαy.
“And having sex with men is gαy. Really it’s all gαy. The only really straight heterosɛҳuąƖ position is to be an asɛҳuąƖ incel. That’s it. That’s all there is.
See video
https://www.politicalflare.com/2022/05/white-nationalist-maga-leader-and-incel-nick-fuentes-says-having-sex-with-women-is-g (https://www.politicalflare.com/2022/05/white-nationalist-maga-leader-and-incel-nick-fuentes-says-having-sex-with-women-is-g)αy/
whether a wise man marries. And after laying down the conditions — that the wife must be fair, of good character, and honest parentage, the husband in good health and of ample means, and after saying that under these circuмstances a wise man sometimes enters the state of matrimony, he immediately proceeds thusQuote from: TheophrastusBut all these conditions are seldom satisfied in marriage. A wise man therefore must not take a wife. For in the first place his study of philosophy will be hindered, and it is impossible for anyone to attend to his books and his wife. Matrons [married women] want many things, costly dresses, gold, jewels, great outlay, maid-servants, all kinds of furniture, litters and gilded coaches. Then come curtain-lectures the livelong night: she complains that one lady goes out better dressed than she: that another is looked up to by all: 'I am a poor despised nobody at the ladies' assemblies.' 'Why did you ogle that creature next door?' 'Why were you talking to the maid?' 'What did you bring from the market?' 'I am not allowed to have a single friend, or companion.' She suspects that her husband's love goes the same way as her hate. There may be in some neighbouring city the wisest of teachers; but if we have a wife we can neither leave her behind, nor take the burden with us. To support a poor wife, is hard: to put up with a rich one, is torture. Notice, too, that in the case of a wife you cannot pick and choose: you must take her as you find her. If she has a bad temper, or is a fool, if she has a blemish, or is proud, or has bad breath, whatever her fault may be — all this we learn after marriage. Horses, asses, cattle, even slaves of the smallest worth, clothes, kettles, wooden seats, cups, and earthenware pitchers, are first tried and then bought: a wife is the only thing that is not shown before she is married, for fear she may not give satisfaction. Our gaze must always be directed to her face, and we must always praise her beauty: if you look at another woman, she thinks that she is out of favour. She must be called my lady, her birth-day must be kept, we must swear by her health and wish that she may survive us, respect must be paid to the nurse, to the nursemaid, to the father's slave, to the foster-child, to the handsome hanger-on, to the curled darling who manages her affairs, and to the eunuch who ministers to the safe indulgence of her lust: names which are only a cloak for adultery. Upon whomsoever she sets her heart, they must have her love though they want her not. If you give her the management of the whole house, you must yourself be her slave. If you reserve something for yourself, she will not think you are loyal to her; but she will turn to strife and hatred, and unless you quickly take care, she will have the poison ready. If you introduce old women, and soothsayers, and prophets, and vendors of jewels and silken clothing, you imperil her chastity; if you shut the door upon them, she is injured and fancies you suspect her. But what is the good of even a careful guardian, when an unchaste wife cannot be watched, and a chaste one ought not to be? For necessity is but a faithless keeper of chastity, and she alone really deserves to be called pure, who is free to sin if she chooses. If a woman be fair, she soon finds lovers; if she be ugly, it is easy to be wanton. It is difficult to guard what many long for. It is annoying to have what no one thinks worth possessing. But the misery of having an ugly wife is less than that of watching a comely one. Nothing is safe, for which a whole people sighs and longs. One man entices with his figure, another with his brains, another with his wit, another with his open hand. Somehow, or sometime, the fortress is captured which is attacked on all sides. Men marry, indeed, so as to get a manager for the house, to solace weariness, to banish solitude; but a faithful slave is a far better manager, more submissive to the master, more observant of his ways, than a wife who thinks she proves herself mistress if she acts in opposition to her husband, that is, if she does what pleases her, not what she is commanded. But friends, and servants who are under the obligation of benefits received, are better able to wait upon us in sickness than a wife who makes us responsible for her tears (she will sell you enough to make a deluge for the hope of a legacy), boasts of her anxiety, but drives her sick husband to the distraction of despair. But if she herself is poorly, we must fall sick with her and never leave her bedside. Or if she be a good and agreeable wife (how rare a bird she is!), we have to share her groans in childbirth, and suffer torture when she is in danger. A wise man can never be alone. He has with him the good men of all time, and turns his mind freely wherever he chooses. What is inaccessible to him in person he can embrace in thought. And, if men are scarce, he converses with God. He is never less alone than when alone. Then again, to marry for the sake of children, so that our name may not perish, or that we may have support in old age, and leave our property without dispute, is the height of stupidity. For what is it to us when we are leaving the world if another bears our name, when even a son does not all at once take his father's title, and there are countless others who are called by the same name. Or what support in old age is he whom you bring up, and who may die before you, or turn out a reprobate? Or at all events when he reaches mature age, you may seem to him long in dying. Friends and relatives whom you can judiciously love are better and safer heirs than those whom you must make your heirs whether you like it or not. Indeed, the surest way of having a good heir is to ruin your fortune in a good cause while you live, not to leave the fruit of your labour to be used you know not how.
Tucker really blew itIndeed. Quite the ad hominem to call Nick "this child, this weirdo gαy kid in his basement".
She meant that she never heard of him until she listened to the entire clip that she summarized in Post #3. From that post she had a gut reaction that something is not quite right with Nick (my guess is his lack of humility, but maybe we are just so used to soft men, that a confident man sounds strange. I don't know.)Thank you for you intelligent assessment Gray. Really, I couldn't have made it clearer when I used the word 'until' - I hadn't heard of Fuentes UNTIL the fanboys began posting - of which, as you correctly stated, I have been commenting on since and getting a feel for this young American pod-caster. My father is an extremely confident man, the type that becomes the center of a discussion or party the moment he enters a room. But he is not rude and disrespectful and does not use bad language in order to seem "tough" and demand attention. When I watched the way Fuentes went on a rant about how Candace Owen treated him - seething with rage and indignation - and calling her a "bitch" several times in a row - even "black bitch", 'confidence' is not a word that comes to mind to describe Fuentes but rather 'a disrespectful, foul-mouthed brat'. And this is before I began to grasp his politics. Now some of what he says I would agree with. But some of it seems purposely designed to mislead and keep you guessing. Including his whole anti-Israel stance. It seems to me, and this is just a personal suspicion, that he is using the anti-Israel card as a means to divide and conquer and cast doubt on other conservative speakers. Just as Tucker Carlson mentioned. I admit that I don't know a whole lot about him, and it just could be that he is a loose canon with a big mouth, but his willingness to do a whole podcast, with realms of information and detail (and mocking), on why 'A' person of good reputation, is not to be trusted, is odd. It just doesn't sit right.
Boru, correct me if I am wrong.
This is a good overview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aK9W1eYRpTs
He basically gives Theophrastus's argument against marriage / for celibacy, and Candace seems clueless (and also doesn't seem to realize that women generally benefit more more marriage than men do):
St. Jerome, in bk. 1 of his Against Jovinianus (https://isidore.co/calibre/#panel=book_details&book_id=6991) §47, gives the only source for the philosopher Theophrastus's On Marriage, "worth its weight in gold," in which he answers the question
This is a good overview:The philosopher Theophrastus was a Greek pagan writing from both a pagan's perspective and from the perspective of a philospher who put celibacy before marriage and children in order to focus on his love for higher learning. St. Jerome uses him as an example to show how even a pagan philosopher saw the wisdom in staying single so as to avoid all the distractions and burdens that a wife and children would bring. St. Jerome writes: "When Theophrastus thus discourses, are there any of us, Christians (https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03712a.htm), whose conversation is in heaven and who daily say Philippians 1:23 (https://www.newadvent.org/bible/phi001.htm#verse23) I long to be dissolved, and to be with Christ, whom he does not put to the blush?" In other words, if this pagan is prepared to give up all for his studies, how much more should we as Christians be willing to give up all for Christ. For such a state - all for Christ - was indeed a higher state (in refutation of Jovinianus who declared the two states equal) than marriage where a man's focus is divided and distracted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aK9W1eYRpTs
He basically gives Theophrastus's argument against marriage / for celibacy, and Candace seems clueless (and also doesn't seem to realize that women generally benefit more more marriage than men do):
St. Jerome, in bk. 1 of his Against Jovinianus (https://isidore.co/calibre/#panel=book_details&book_id=6991) §47, gives the only source for the philosopher Theophrastus's On Marriage, "worth its weight in gold," in which he answers the question
Staying single so you can live a selfish life without responsibilities and without having to consider other people, is not what either St. Jerome or the pagan Theophratus were talking about.
So, the million dollar question - is Fuentes aversion to marriage so that he can dedicate all to Christ or so that he can dedicate all to himself?
Fuentes really destroyed Tucker. :cowboy:How did he "destroy" Tucker? And why would he? What is the purpose of Fuentes actions? What is the overall good? And why is Tucker a sociopath? It's wise to understand the Jєωιѕн question for sure, but not everyone believes that shoving it down the public's throat is the answer.
Tucker is a world class sociopath.
Still waiting for Candace and her good buddy Tucker to expose the h0Ɩ0h0αx, but I think something has to freeze over first.Why are you waiting? Why is this seen as the most critical piece of information that needs to get out there? Don't get me wrong, we are on the same page in the sense I believe the story being pushed is propaganda, but again, there are other ways to alert the public to the elites behind the scenes. For example Candace has drawn people's attention to the fact that Trump's loyalties are clearly tied to Israel. This is smart. It immediately grabs the attention of the American Patriots.
To be fair Fuentes has often identified himself as being in Group 2 as seen below.Yes, I've heard him say so. But if its involuntary, why does he mock relationships so much? Why is he so disrespectful towards women? Why does he equate being with a woman as being gαy? Yes, he loves his shock value, and yes, I get the meaning behind those words, but when you take what he says - and the way he says it - as a whole, you are left with the impression he is choosing single life - not because it is the higher calling for Christ - but because it suits him - "He arn't going to be told by no woman!" I believe that's a fair assumption given the personae he puts forward.
03:30 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yo_Ep8V9rQ&t=210s) Group 1: Free Spirits
06:00 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yo_Ep8V9rQ&t=360s) Group 2: Involuntary Single People
08:27 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yo_Ep8V9rQ&t=507s) Don't lower your standards for marriage
11:06 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yo_Ep8V9rQ&t=666s) Group 3: Those who choose single life
Still waiting for Candace and her good buddy Tucker to expose the h0Ɩ0h0αx, but I think something has to freeze over first.Yea, their cashflow. :laugh1:
Still waiting for Candace and her good buddy Tucker to expose the h0Ɩ0h0αx, but I think something has to freeze over first.https://www.infowars.com/posts/exclusive-candace-owens-says-benjamin-netanyahu-is-the-real-president-of-the-united-states
https://www.infowars.com/posts/exclusive-candace-owens-says-benjamin-netanyahu-is-the-real-president-of-the-united-statesThanks for posting. As a married woman with children, this is one brave lady. May God protect her and keep her and her family safe.
Still waiting for Candace and her good buddy Tucker to expose the h0Ɩ0h0αx, but I think something has to freeze over first.
Fuentes is a master at sleuthing and elucidation. He really exposed Tucker as the CIA spook that he is. :smirk:Newbie accounts warrant suspicion that banned bad actors are trying to resurrect themselves.
Fuentes here has a true understanding of who Christ is and an ability to transmit it in clarity.With all due respect, while most of what Fuentes says is true, his explanation is not all that clear in places and implies a separation between the two covenants. His opening lines state that the new testament replaces the theology of the Old Testament. This is incorrect. Said Christ "Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil." Matt.5:17. Fuentes also speaks of the Old Testament having Rabbis. This is misleading. It was a sacrificial priesthood and completely different from Rabbis of today. As Fuentes does correctly state, everything in the Old Testament was symbolic of the New: Christ was the Law, Our Lady was the Ark of the Covenant that carried the Law, Christ was the sacrificial Lamb, and the Temple of the Holy Ghost. Everything that made up the Old Law was elevated - not changed -to a divine level including the priesthood, and Israel itself. Yes, the new Israel is the Catholic Church made up of Christians who historically would have come form the all the lost and dispersed tribes of Israel. That is why Christ said there is no (longer) Jew nor gentile.
Again who else is even touching these fundamentals of Truth in the secular world?
https://x.com/i/status/1953216927821619537
Fuentes here has a true understanding of who Christ is and an ability to transmit it in clarity.Excellent post. Thanks.
Again who else is even touching these fundamentals of Truth in the secular world?
https://x.com/i/status/1953216927821619537
https://www.bitchute.com/video/un7GkLIO2Bcb
Fuentes here has a true understanding of who Christ is and an ability to transmit it in clarity.Ugh - the rise and fall of a zio- player Nick. . I was fooled by him for sure .i now find him repulsively and deceptively disgusting .
Again who else is even touching these fundamentals of Truth in the secular world?
https://x.com/i/status/1953216927821619537
Fuentes is disgusting.And now that he completely dismissed any theory that 🇮🇱 might have had a rôle to play in Kirk's death, we know he's a sell-out to Zionism.
They are going to use Charlie Kirk’s death relentlessly to shill for JD Vance in 2028.
That’s clearly why Vance jumped in front of this from the beginning by carrying Kirk’s casket and hosting his show.
They are doing absolutely everything to enthrone him as Trump’s successor.
Fuentes is just being setup as the new Alex Jones...the millenial/gen z version. He's "out there" and he's the news guy for the far, far right.
No.
He's the bait to yank Catholic men out of supernatural life, and throw them into the dank dungeon of foul mouthed, passion intoxicated, erroneous, naturalistic pseudo-religion.
One shtick to rule them all.
One shtick to find them.
One shtick to catch their souls.
And in the darkness bind them.
E Michael Jones and others of note are on record as not being in accord with your simplistic black and white write off of an individual who arguably -- in spite of his unfortunate foul mouth has actually brought a fair number of individuals (if candid confessional comments posted at his platforms are of any meaning) back to the Faith or to the Faith for the first time.
I can obviously not judge his interior forum, but even if he does not go to a Mass every Sunday and I don't know as he doesn't it may be morally excusable if his life would honestly be too much in jeopardy. If he in good faith based on a well formed Catholic conscience believes it would be I think that in and of itself would be justifiable grounds for him to not appear in public to go Mass. As far as appearing in public to get groceries, etc., I imagine he may very well have others who would be willing to do that for him. (Just because I try to give Nick the favor of the doubt on this forum should not brand me as some sort of off the wall cult follower or something along those lines. That's ridiculous ad hominem theatrics, not befitting of Catholic conversation.)
And, fella, you are a textbook cultling. pick Jesus Christ or a manly Saint to follow and admire.
I'm not going to rush to judgment by rashly and instantly writing Fuentes off. I think that's exactly what the ADL and others of that ilk would love. He does not say that it's not possible that Israel was not involved in the Kirk take down.
Nicholas J. Fuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)@NickJFuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)
America First 🇺🇸 / Christ is King 👑
Chicago, IL
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes (https://rumble.com/nickjfuentes)
Joined April 2014
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media) 666 Photos and videos
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G1OOO6iW0AsuDHC.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1969073860755509454#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G08yaRJXcAESw39.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1967846994740928591#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G0s-0hGWEAAjzFe.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1966734737499730025#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G0VmnRYWUA0iEvq.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1965089640895115648#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GzorCxnX0AAwOC_.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1961927921154609647#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GzUliGoWcAANjqH.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1960514483895378165#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GzUff0BXgAAgDYq.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1960507848913260702#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gy5OOGzWgAAvdBb.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1958588897862328479#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/amplify_video_thumb/1958248211132432385/img/EupbjpidzBZJjD17.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1958248276496388106#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gy0IGDJXQAAhP9c.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1958230317317149032#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gywr--PXMAApywr.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1957988302063091714#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GywBAnQWcAAFaZH.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1957941051739586936#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GyvegM1WkAAp7U0.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1957903111139549571#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GylPfYaXUAApBao.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1957182936039465438#m)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gyk7i_NW8AAC_xV.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1957160991248011560#m)(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)Nicholas J. Fuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)@NickJFuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)
- Tweets (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)
- Tweets & Replies (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/with_replies)
- Media (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)
- Search (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/search)
5h (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1969834801956868326#m)
They are going to use Charlie Kirk’s death relentlessly to shill for JD Vance in 2028.
That’s clearly why Vance jumped in front of this from the beginning by carrying Kirk’s casket and hosting his show.
They are doing absolutely everything to enthrone him as Trump’s successor.
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)Nicholas J. Fuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)@NickJFuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)
9h (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1969775215346401348#m)
For the record— not ONE of my opinions has changed since Kirk’s murder. And that includes my belief that Kirk was a shill for Israel & the GOP.
I find it hard to believe (but not impossible) that Israel killed him. He called me a “demonic Jew hate” LAST MONTH. He was their ally.
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)Nicholas J. Fuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)@NickJFuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)
9h (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1969774123841655285#m)
First, there was a coordinated, top-down campaign to frame me and the Groypers for Charlie Kirk’s murder.
Now, there is a coordinated campaign to accuse me of “covering up” Israel’s supposed role in Charlie Kirk’s murder.
Something very suspicious is happening right now.
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)Nicholas J. Fuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)@NickJFuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)
12h (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1969728468184371295#m)
The United States is considered the “8th front” in Netanyahu’s all-out war for total control of the Middle East against Iran.
Make no mistake about it— Israel’s agents are fighting a psychological & political war against the American public just as viciously as they are in Gaza.
Nicholas J. Fuentes retweeted
(https://xcancel.com/vertigomailman)Vietnam Mailman (https://xcancel.com/vertigomailman)@vertigomailman (https://xcancel.com/vertigomailman)
Sep 18 (https://xcancel.com/vertigomailman/status/1968820813483643378#m)
i love the implication that netenyahu just paid off nick fuentes but he had to kill charlie kirk
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)Nicholas J. Fuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)@NickJFuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)
Sep 18 (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1968755907220623718#m)
I know this is hard for people to process but there are millions of Americans with radical progressive politics who think you are a nαzι if you don’t support trans kids and White Genocide and they want to hurt you because of it.
This is true independently of Palantir and Israel.
Ugh - the rise and fall of a zio- player Nick. . I was fooled by him for sure .i now find him repulsively and deceptively disgusting .I admire you Josefa; it takes courage to admit having been fooled. We have all been fooled at one time or another. We are engaged in spiritual warfare and the enemy's use of controlled opposition has become slick and exquisitely convincing. Their targeted population get drawn in by (refreshenly) hearing the truth in 99% of what the controlled op says, and then they slip in that 1% lie. It can be difficult to deal with the cognitive dissonance of realizing one has been deceived. God bless you.
Mea culpa
hard to admit that Owen Benjamin and Milo , as obnoxious as they both are , were correct about him.
So, the BOTTOM LINE here is that anybody who has a big platform, significant funding, large following, etc. ... they're either directly on the payroll, blackmailed into compliance/control, or else at the very least useful for some reason ... but NONE OF THESE present any kind of threat against the Jєωιѕн agenda. If they did, they could be eliminated so fast their heads would spin, and, no, they would not "martyrize" them either. They could hack their computers and fill them with child porn and then perp walk them out the door to their disgrace, and to the discrediting of their message. Or else they can go down in some "accident", commit ѕυιcιdє, or die of a heart attack or stroke (through some of the several undetectable means they have of bringing that about).
(https://media.tenor.com/5-bo7ZuNuJYAAAAM/2pac-tupac.gif)
So, those who are NOT controlled, they remain in relative obscurity, people like Jeff Rense, Brother Nathanael, or Dustin Nemos, etc.
Always remember, too, that there are multiple LAYERS of gate-keepers, as that's how gatekeeping works. If you see through Jones ... you might pass through and go up to the next gate, to a Tucker Carlson or Candace Owens. If you realize that you haven't found "ulltimate truth" with these two (some stop there), then maybe you push on through to a Nick Fuentes, and then to Stew Peters, etc. But it's harder and harder at each gate to see what might be on the other side or even to suspect that they're hiding something else.
So these gate-keepers play on each other. "Yeah, Jones is a shill for Israel. Come and join the Stew Peters Network for REAL TRUTH." Pay no attention to their pretend Kayfabe in-fighting. They're all on the same team, just playing different roles.
So, the BOTTOM LINE here is that anybody who has a big platform, significant funding, large following, etc. ... they're either directly on the payroll, blackmailed into compliance/control, or else at the very least useful for some reason ... but NONE OF THESE present any kind of threat against the Jєωιѕн agenda. If they did, they could be eliminated so fast their heads would spin, and, no, they would not "martyrize" them either. They could hack their computers and fill them with child porn and then perp walk them out the door to their disgrace, and to the discrediting of their message. Or else they can go down in some "accident", commit ѕυιcιdє, or die of a heart attack or stroke (through some of the several undetectable means they have of bringing that about).
(https://media.tenor.com/5-bo7ZuNuJYAAAAM/2pac-tupac.gif)
So, those who are NOT controlled, they remain in relative obscurity, people like Jeff Rense, Brother Nathanael, or Dustin Nemos, etc.
Always remember, too, that there are multiple LAYERS of gate-keepers, as that's how gatekeeping works. If you see through Jones ... you might pass through and go up to the next gate, to a Tucker Carlson or Candace Owens. If you realize that you haven't found "ulltimate truth" with these two (some stop there), then maybe you push on through to a Nick Fuentes, and then to Stew Peters, etc. But it's harder and harder at each gate to see what might be on the other side or even to suspect that they're hiding something else.
So these gate-keepers play on each other. "Yeah, Jones is a shill for Israel. Come and join the Stew Peters Network for REAL TRUTH." Pay no attention to their pretend Kayfabe in-fighting. They're all on the same team, just playing different roles.
Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don't try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. "The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength."
Hmm. We better think up a new term: gatephobia? In the meantime, we can enjoy Owen Benjamin who hates Nick Fuentes with a passion going off on Catholicism: Twitter: Owen Benjamin Hates Catholicism : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive (https://archive.org/details/twitter-owen-benjamin-hates-catholicism)
Look at how many photos and videos were posted, there is that 666 symbolism, they can not help themselves.
Oops! What went wrong? One more got added so now it's at 667. (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)(https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1617875006343761928/e4foWyba_400x400.jpg) (https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1617875006343761928/e4foWyba.jpg)
Nicholas J. Fuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)@NickJFuentes (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes)
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)America First 🇺🇸 / Christ is King 👑
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)[color=rgba(248, 248, 242, 0.81)]
Chicago, IL[/color]
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)[color=rgba(248, 248, 242, 0.81)]
Rumble.com/nickjfuentes (https://rumble.com/nickjfuentes)[/color]
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)[color=rgba(248, 248, 242, 0.81)] Joined April 2014
[/color]
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media) 667 Photos and videos
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)
(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G1jgNBTXkAAXa8V.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1970571354379292820#m)(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G1OOO6iW0AsuDHC.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1969073860755509454#m)(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G08yaRJXcAESw39.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1967846994740928591#m)(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G0s-0hGWEAAjzFe.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1966734737499730025#m)(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G0VmnRYWUA0iEvq.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1965089640895115648#m)(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GzorCxnX0AAwOC_.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1961927921154609647#m)(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GzUliGoWcAANjqH.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1960514483895378165#m)(https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/media)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GzUff0BXgAAgDYq.jpg:thumb) (https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1960507848913260702#m)