Tucker really blew it- I don't know how he can adequately recoup after this scathing retaliation by Nick.
It was truly an amazing piece of work.

https://rumble.com/v6x2fjg-exposing-tucker-carlson.html?e9s=src_v1_cmd%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a

Just finished listening to this. The first thing I noticed - and was waiting for - was the proof to back up Fuentes claim that Tucker had lied about not knowing his father was working for the CIA. Fuentes claims he lied about this twice. Yet all we have is Fuentes word. No proof. So having established Tucker as a "liar" in the mind of his viewers, Fuentes then goes on to remind everyone that Tucker used to work as a broadcaster for Fox News  which he paints one of "the mouths of Israel". So, having painted Tucker as a suspect character from the outset, Fuentes then goes on a monologue about how the 2020 election was rigged and stolen from Trump, how all the Republican's were complicit in this theft, and how Tucker did nothing to defend Trump. Fuentes then moves on to Joe Kent (a conservative Trump supporter). He tells us that he rang up Joe Kent and offered him his services on helping get him into office. Fuentes said he would pull out all stops for him but on the condition that Kent never disavowed him publicly. Again we only have Fuentes word that Kent agree to this or that this condition was even mentioned. Or that any sort conversation took place between them. Needless to say, Joe Kent did publicly distance himself from Fuentes stating that his version of 'American First' was different to Fuentes' who was openly anti-Israel. Fuentes, true to form, went on the defensive to publicly attack Joe Kent stating that he - and Tucker - have "a race-blind, pro-Israeli view of the world" and were "fundamentally pro-Israel".

Ok. So, as Tucker admits, Fuentes is a very talented speaker and has his finger on the political pulse. However, underneath all that, I would agree with the assessment by both Owens and Tucker, that Fuentes has angry little boy issues. He cannot stand being crossed or criticized and always, always, goes on the immediate attack without considering the greater political good. It is ALWAYS about him. He knew that Joe Kent was not openly anti-Israel. We know that because Fuentes would not have raised "the condition" in the first place otherwise. He knew he and Kent did not see eye to eye on that issue. Yet Fuentes turned this issue into A ISSUE, as a means to attack Joe Kent. A politically savvy person would have simply ignored it - expected it - with the satisfaction of knowing that, despite his weaknesses, Joe Kent was one of the better candidates. No. Fuentes had to make it personal; had to go on the attack. That's not intelligent.

How often do you get a reality check like this from any other pundit?

Maybe it's always about him because it is usually just him that is shut down, debanked and cancelled , where as all of the other "truthers" and "anti-neocons" tend to function very comfortably- wonder why that is?

The fact is is that everyone knew for years that Kent, Bannon and the sort are CIA gatekeepers for Israel and that Tucker's father was a spook- I even knew his father was CIA last year and Putin even exposed during his "Tucker" interview that Tucker himself was refused entrance into the CIA, and now he is saying he didn't know that his father was CIA until his death in May 2025?

Very very unlikely, with Tucker living in the midst and a part of the DC monster and in establishment (CIA) media all of his life.

I think Fuentes a spoilt brat but if he is right about Tucker lying, I'd be interested in investigating that more. Can you post a link to the Putin/Tucker interview where he states Tucker was refused entrance into the CIA. And how did you know that Tucker's father was a member of the CIA?