CathInfo.com

You're either after the truth FIRST, or being accepted by the world FIRST. Many times they conflict, so you have to choose which is your higher priority. I'd rather be wrong a few times while I seek the truth for its own sake, than always cling to the "majority opinion" so I'm considered "right" by the greatest number of people -- even though that position is often wrong in God's eyes.

I'm not picking on you. This  thread is an occasion.

If "truth" is the highest priority, then you wouldn't lock yourself into positions that could be wrong. The problem here is not that something was wrong - everyone makes mistakes -  but that it showed certainty about something that turned out to be wrong.

Let's be realistic here. While MSM gets things wrong, so does "alt media", and we should be skeptical of "alt media", too. A lot of alt media is controlled opposition. Some may be enemy plants. And some is run by "useful idiots".

And this is not just about being against "worldlings". We do not need to take contrary positions on everything that the world agrees with.The world gets things right, too. They tend to use toilets rather than the living room carpet. Many of them even accept 1+1=2.

Many of these problems would clear up if people had the discipline to not pass judgements about fields they don't know anything about. There's a thread about quantum mechanics. Of those commenting, how many have at least graduate degrees in quantum physics? How about have taken ONE CLASS in quantum physics? I'm guessing not many. But without any background or genuine knowledge of the field, these people condemn it entirely. That's pride - that with no work on your own, you can be above experts.

In the absence of knowledge, a lot of things are possible. So sure, if you ignored press releases, it was possible RBG was dead. Likewise, to someone who has never studied quantum physics, it might seem possible that some experiment is being misinterpreted. But that's before someone has put in the work to study it.

3195
 
What is Ruth Bader Ginsberg's Current State of Health?
 Q!!mG7VJxZNCI 25 Mar 2019 - 10:22:25 PM



https://www.c-span.org/video/?458080-1/flowers-v-mississippi-oral-argument📁
[19:56]
What is [RBG's] current state-of-health?
Are pictures being 'avoided' for a reason?
Pics in/out of home in/out of cars = easy
Q

No recent verified pictures of RBG have been posted since December 2018.

Only audio recordings such as C-Span?

Within the realm of possibility:
-- Has Ginsburg appeared at the Supreme Court recently (since December 2019)?
-- AI recordings are possible using past recordings.
-- A double could be used with voice qualities very much like Ginsburg.

There is still a possibility of a SCOTUS vacancy before the fall. RBG is 85 years old; she is not in good health. It would be in her best interest to retire and let the president pick a successor.

Now Donald Trump is in the most amount of trouble since Bush 41, who actually lost in 1992. There is a real chance that Donald J. Trump is a one-term president. That being said, if that happens, he can go out with 3 SCOTUS picks.