Author Topic: Fascinating, the power of Propaganda on American people  (Read 378 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23137
  • Reputation: +20286/-248
  • Gender: Male
Fascinating, the power of Propaganda on American people
« on: July 24, 2019, 05:48:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fox News Poll: Trump approval up, voter ratings on economy best in decades


    American Conservative Union chair Matt Schlapp and former Clinton campaign adviser Richard Goodstein on the difference in rhetoric for the 2020 presidential race.
    More voters rate the economy positively today than have since 2001, according to the latest Fox News Poll.
    In addition, approval of the job President Trump is doing on the economy stands at 52 percent (41 percent disapprove). That’s just one-point off his high of 53 percent last summer, and up from 48-46 percent in May.

    That job rating is helped, in part, by the 51 percent of voters now feeling the economy is in positive shape (excellent or good).  The last time this many felt that way was almost two decades ago (59 percent, January 2001).

    CLICK HERE TO READ THE POLL RESULTS
    However, it’s unclear whether Trump can count on these ratings come election time. While 33 percent say economic conditions will get better if he is re-elected (39 percent worse), the same number, 33 percent, think it will get better if a Democrat wins the White House (36 percent worse).

    In general, voters think Republicans would do a better job handling national security (+10 points) and the economy (+7).  They give Democrats the advantage on race relations (+23 points), bringing the country together (+15), health care (+14), and immigration (+5).  It’s mostly a draw on some issues that historically fall in the GOP column, such as on foreign policy (D+4), border security (R+3), the federal budget deficit (R+3), and taxes (even).
    Despite the rosy economic views, Trump’s overall job approval remains below 50 percent:  46 percent approve, while 51 percent disapprove.  Last month, it was 45-53 percent (June 2019).  His best ratings, 48-47 percent, came soon after he took office (February 2017).

    Here’s why his overall rating remains underwater:  He receives net negative marks on border security (44 approve - 52 disapprove), immigration (41-54), international trade (40-49), Iran (39-46), North Korea (39-49), and health care (38-51).
    The president’s lowest marks are on race relations (32-57 percent), where more voters disapprove than approve by 25 points.  He was underwater by 22 points in October 2018 (35-57 percent).
    Over half, 57 percent, don’t believe Trump respects racial minorities, including 73 percent of non-whites.
    Some 34 percent think the president does respect minorities, down from 41 percent in 2017.  That decline is mostly due to a 14-point drop among Republicans (68 percent now vs. 82 percent in 2017).

    Majorities think that Trump went too far in tweets criticizing four minority Democratic Congresswomen, and believe telling a person of color to go back to the country they came from is a racist thing to say.
    The new poll, released Wednesday, finds 63 percent think Trump’s tweets crossed the line.  Far fewer, 27 percent, see them as an acceptable political attack.

    Thirty-three percent of Republicans join 88 percent of Democrats in saying the tweets crossed the line.  Some key electoral groups agree: 73 percent of suburban women, 68 percent of independents, and 64 percent of voters living in close counties (where Hillary Clinton and Trump were within 10 points in 2016).
    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
    A 53 percent majority of Republicans calls the tweets an acceptable political attack.  GOP men (59 percent) are more likely than GOP women (48 percent) to find them acceptable.
    Black voters (79 percent), Democrats (88 percent), and Democratic women in particular (91 percent) are among those most likely to believe the tweets went too far.
    Overall, 56 percent think it is racist to say “go back” to a person of color, while 23 percent disagree, and 18 percent say it depends.
    Most Democrats (85 percent) and blacks (76 percent), over half of independents (57 percent), and half of whites (50 percent) say the “go back” language is racist.
    Among Republicans, 21 percent feel it is racist, while more than twice that number disagree (45 percent), and 30 percent say it depends.
    One of the Congresswomen of the so-called “Squad” the president criticized, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), is as almost as well-known to voters nationally as long-time congressional leaders.  For example, 9 percent have never heard of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, while 12 percent are unfamiliar with Ocasio-Cortez.  Only three percent have never heard of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
    Ocasio-Cortez and Pelosi are about equally popular among Democrats: Pelosi rates more positively than negatively by 41 points and Ocasio-Cortez by 39.  For comparison, McConnell receives a net positive by 9 points among Republicans.

    A majority of voters has an unfavorable view of Trump:  45 percent favorable vs. 51 percent unfavorable.  Among Republicans, his favorable rating hits 87 percent.
    Ocasio-Cortez is underwater among all voters by 7 points (34 favorable - 41 unfavorable), driven by 68 percent of Republicans rating her negatively.
    Pelosi is underwater by 11 points (39-50 percent) and McConnell by 22 (25-47 percent).
    Another member of the “Squad,” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), is viewed negatively by 11 points (26-37 percent), while 22 percent have never heard of her.
    Pollpourri
    Six in 10 voters are concerned about the treatment of migrants detained on the U.S.-Mexico border, including 31 percent who feel “extremely” concerned.  Most Democrats (82 percent) are concerned, while a majority of Republicans (58 percent) is not.

    Fox News Channel’s Chief White House correspondent John Roberts reports the White House announced Tuesday that between May 13 to July 11, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) arrested more than 900 people who had remained in the country despite being ordered to leave.
    Voters have mixed views on the job ICE is doing:  45 percent approve, while 49 percent disapprove.  The party divide is stark:  80 percent of Republicans approve, while 80 of Democrats disapprove.
    Conducted July 21-23, 2019 under the joint direction of Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company (R), this Fox News Poll includes interviews with 1,004 randomly chosen registered voters nationwide who spoke with live interviewers on both landlines and cellphones.  The poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points for all registered voters.
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 23137
    • Reputation: +20286/-248
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fascinating, the power of Propaganda on American people
    « Reply #1 on: July 24, 2019, 05:51:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As if ANY of this can be taken seriously.

    They should have kept the poll simple by asking just one question:

    1. Orange man bad. True or false?

    That basically put everyone into the proper group. Because THIS is ridiculous:


    Quote
    He receives net negative marks on border security (44 approve - 52 disapprove), immigration (41-54), international trade (40-49), Iran (39-46), North Korea (39-49), and health care (38-51).


    What's not to like on Iran? North Korea? What, are they disappointed we're not at war with these countries yet? Are they really disappointed that we're headed towards peace with North Korea? Or do they just hate Trump in every possible category?

    And border security? Seriously? Unless you're NOT for border security, in which case screw you, Trump is (in)famous for his desire to build and update a wall along the southern border. And international trade? Seriously? Trump has certainly re-negotiated many deals worldwide to be more balanced in favor of America. So unless you're an anti-American globalist shill, you have to like Trump's actions in that department.

    They could have asked

    Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion on Trump as regards his position on kitten killing (note: he's against it)
    49% favorable
    51% unfavorable


    Asking Dems for an honest breakdown of their opinions is like expecting honest constructive criticism from a 5 year old about his parents, after he's just been told "no" he can't have a toy. Of course he's going to say everything bad about his parents; he's mad at them! You can't take his "critiques" any kind of seriously.
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!


    Offline B from A

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 537
    • Reputation: +382/-105
    • Gender: Female

    Offline AlligatorDicax

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 804
    • Reputation: +324/-104
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • As if ANY of this can be taken seriously.
    [....]
    Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion on Trump as regards his position on kitten killing (note: he's against it)
    49% favorable
    51% unfavorable

    Asking Dems for an honest breakdown of their opinions is like expecting honest constructive criticism from a 5 year old about his parents, after he's just been told "no" he can't have a toy. Of course he's going to say everything bad about his parents; he's mad at them! You can't take his "critiques" any kind of seriously.

    More so if the 5 year old been recently spanked after mistreating the family kitty, albeit naïvely ignorant that a living juvenile animal can't endure the mistreatment or abuse that a stuffed-animal toy can.

    And may God protect his parents when the child learns that there's this thing in most states that has a name like "child-protective services",  notorious for a low standard of proof for oral claims by children.  For leftist Democrats determined to carry out their "soft coup" tantrum, 1 comparable political organization is called the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Offline AlligatorDicax

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 804
    • Reputation: +324/-104
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fascinating, the power of Propaganda on American people
    « Reply #4 on: July 26, 2019, 10:45:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • As if any of this can be taken seriously.

    Alas, the 2000-teens flood of propaganda isn't coming from Godless Communist Russians.  Now it's coming from the "mainstream" broadcasting networks in the U.S.A., which in decades long-past had earned & stockpiled credibility from reporting & anchoring by newsmen like Huntley, Brinkley, Uncle Walter[×], and roughly a generation later, as the mask of objectivity that had been expected for decades from news-professionals was otherwise obviously slipping off, by Koppel!

    Most of the credibility earned in decades long-past was back when breaking news was captured on honest-to-God (chemical) film, and physically rushed for development and selection or editing to local newspapers or t.v.-network-affiliates, if not to network headquarters in Noo Yawk City.  And the immediacy of then-modern news technology was symbolized by the widely recognized sound of a chattering TeletypeTM [#].

    But now, as I've been told that Pink Panther actor Peter Sellers would nasally summarize it: "Not any mooore".  Now the news-media has flung away that mask of objectivity [+], and is now shamelessly colluding (ahem!)  with the "soft-coup" campaign of the radical antiConstitutional socialists of what still calls itself the "Democratic" Party.

    -------
    Note ×: As audio-tapes of Pres. Johnson's official telephone calls, which I recall as not being released until after his death, revealed, he once lamented in a subdued Texan grumble "If I've lost Cronkite, I've lost [the support of] Middle America."  Cronkite (1916--2009, anchor 1962--1981) had taken a longish overseas assignment to Vietnam (Feb. 1968), including combat zones (he had been a daring front-line combat correspondent in World War II).  As I recall, Cronkite went to verify unfavorable reports from his son, who was serving in 1 of the U.S. military services stationed there.  About a decade after he retired from the anchor's chair, he began increasingly to publicly display liberal & globalist sentiments.  My memories were greatly assisted by <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Cronkite>.  But I digress.

    Note #: That's Baudot code, yall !  We don' need no new-fangled steen-king AS-CII !

    Note +: I absolutely positively do include the historic print-media, whether mostly retreated from brick & mortar printing presses to the Web, or not.


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16