That is the subject. Possible discussions would have been:
The sede group I belong to does not teach salvation without belief in the Incarnation (Christ) and the Holy Trinity
the SSPX is right, people can be saved in other religions, Abp. Lefevbre said so.
One can be saved by Implicit desire for baptism by their belief in a God that rewards, implicitly they believe in Christ, which does not go against the Athanasian Creed.
Our current sede situation is not unprecedented and it is as doctrinally defined as EENS
Great, then if you want a less stupid thread,
pick one, and frame it "yeah" or "nay", pro or con.
It'll still derail, but it'll be less muddy, easier to track, and instead of inclining responses towards chaos by introducing distinct, and so extraneous, things you'll have, one step at a time, exactly one point to be addressed, that isn't framed as "i prefer this", which is an invitation to "okay" or "whatever".
You post it, you're framing it. If you don't want a certain tone, then don't
set that tone.
Take too many big bites, and you end up with a pile of puke. Smallest bites, esp. where there is no moderation, is safer.
Topic: Why I Do Not Push the Sede Position (Read 11517 times)