Yes, I am guilty of saying CMRI cult members and you all reply like cult members - -after all the replies came through with the same ad hominems - but the question was never answered. All the replies actually come across as cult members would reply.
I won't deny it - why do you?
Example please of our cult reply, or apologize.
Go back and look, you will find that I am one of the "CMRI haters", one of the "CMRI detractors", "Baptism of Desire deniers", I "attack all of us Catholics who keep the Fath whole and entire", a "feeneyite", a "feeneyite", a "feeneyite", a "feeneyite", "a misguided person who goes by Protestant ideas", an "unjust man", a "feeneyite", a heretic, a "non-Catholic", and etc.
One thing no one, except TKGS, even attempted to do, is answer the question because for 50 pages they are all too busy commenting on what their opinion of my faults are all about.
So no, I won't apologize because the replies were cult like replies.
Everyone some how seems to think that whether they answer the question or not is dependent upon my reason for asking the question - how dare I question anything about the CMRI! - THAT is a characteristic of cult like replies.
You are satisfied with him being a nice man, a holy man, a great leader and bishop never caring where he was trained for the priesthood - you may not even care if he was trained and indoctrinated for 12 years by Schuckardt - I don't know what it is you people care about - but as for me, I care and want to know where he went - because in those days, I could not find even one single seminary anywhere within the US that offered "the usual seminary training" - I am not saying there were no such places, but simply that I searched high and low and could not find any within the US.
I knew of Schuckardt's place back then and I assure you that CMRI is more screwed up than I ever imagined if THAT is what they are calling "the usual seminary training."
You don't seem at all to care where your leader was trained and how "screwed up" he is, this is why your replies are such a joke.
Yes, not only am I satisfied with Bishop Pivarunas as being inspired by the Holy Ghost but I thank God for showing me CMRI. I truly do not know if Schuckardt taught Bishop Pivarunas anything of the Faith or not, all I know is today Bishop Pivarunas is well trained Catholic Bishop.
Well that's all fine and good - you don't care and you have your reasons for not caring - as I have said, I don't care what your reasons are for not caring.
I care and have my reasons why I care - as I already explained.
But that is not good enough for the CMRI supporters - and I don't care that my reasons for caring do not meet with the CMRI supporter's approval or that my reasons are cause for CMRI supporters to think whatever they want to think of me or that my reasons are the cause for them to dance around the question, side tracking with ad hominems with almost each post they make - and all the rest of the nonsense they've been posting to get away from the question.
I still would like to know where this "usual seminary training" was in the mid 70s. Why I would like to know should have zero impact on anyone to prohibit answering the question one iota - unless, far as I can tell, they have something to fear.