Author Topic: Was the Denzinger tampered with? (Read 4734 times)

Yeti · « **Reply #5 on:** January 30, 2020, 07:49:11 PM »

Thank you for your insight, Kasimierz. Do you have any idea why he would have deleted this condemnation from the Denzinger? I'm baffled by this whole thing.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #6 on:** January 30, 2020, 08:00:14 PM »

Quote from: Yeti on January 30, 2020, 07:49:11 PM

Thank you for your insight, Kasimierz. Do you have any idea why he would have deleted this condemnation from the Denzinger? I'm baffled by this whole thing.

Which edition/year of the Denzinger is it missing from?

Yeti · « **Reply #7 on:** January 30, 2020, 08:35:18 PM »

I gave the link: https://archive.org/details/DenzingerTheSourcesOfCatholicDogma/page/n265/mode/2up

ServusChristi · « **Reply #8 on:** February 04, 2020, 02:07:39 PM »

Below is the link to the 1911 publication of the Enchiridion symbolorum.

https://archive.org/details/enchiridionsymbo00denz/page/252/mode/2up

On page 253, you will find the (omitted from the 1954 onward editions) error of Petri De Osma, #730 "Ecclesia urbis Romae errare potest."

Yeti · « **Reply #9 on:** February 04, 2020, 05:11:17 PM »

Quote from: ServusChristi on February 04, 2020, 02:07:39 PM

Below is the link to the 1911 publication of the Enchiridion symbolorum.

https://archive.org/details/enchiridionsymbo00denz/page/252/mode/2up

On page 253, you will find the (omitted from the 1954 onward editions) error of Petri De Osma, #730 "Ecclesia urbis Romae errare potest."

.
Yes, thank you, I saw that. But I'm curious why it was omitted? And what does this proposition mean that the Church of the city of Rome cannot err? Then what is Vatican 2?

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Was the Denzinger tampered with? (Read 4734 times)

Yeti

Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?

SeanJohnson

Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?

Yeti

Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?

ServusChristi

Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?

Yeti

Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?