Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Was the Denzinger tampered with?  (Read 4720 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2020, 07:49:11 PM »
Thank you for your insight, Kasimierz. Do you have any idea why he would have deleted this condemnation from the Denzinger? I'm baffled by this whole thing.

Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2020, 08:00:14 PM »
Thank you for your insight, Kasimierz. Do you have any idea why he would have deleted this condemnation from the Denzinger? I'm baffled by this whole thing.
Which edition/year of the Denzinger is it missing from?


Offline Yeti

  • Supporter

Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2020, 02:07:39 PM »
Below is the link to the 1911 publication of the Enchiridion symbolorum.

https://archive.org/details/enchiridionsymbo00denz/page/252/mode/2up


On page 253, you will find the (omitted from the 1954 onward editions) error of Petri De Osma, #730 "Ecclesia urbis Romae errare potest."

Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
« Reply #9 on: February 04, 2020, 05:11:17 PM »
Below is the link to the 1911 publication of the Enchiridion symbolorum.

https://archive.org/details/enchiridionsymbo00denz/page/252/mode/2up


On page 253, you will find the (omitted from the 1954 onward editions) error of Petri De Osma, #730 "Ecclesia urbis Romae errare potest."
.
Yes, thank you, I saw that. But I'm curious why it was omitted? And what does this proposition mean that the Church of the city of Rome cannot err? Then what is Vatican 2?