Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Transalpine Redemptorists, valid?  (Read 62930 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Transalpine Redemptorists, valid?
« on: October 29, 2025, 10:01:06 AM »
Are any of the TAR ordained by NO bishops?

Re: Transalpine Redemptorists, valid?
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2025, 10:40:56 AM »
The ones ordained before they left for the Conciliar Church would be done by the SSPX, and therefore valid.
The ones after... is another question.
It is possible that Arbp Vigano did it as he himself was ordained conditionally by Bishop Williamson.
But we can't be sure until the relevant priests come out and say that they were. 


Re: Transalpine Redemptorists, valid?
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2025, 05:11:26 PM »
Bishop Pierre Roy sedevacantist conditionally ordained the rest of them. They flew to Canda to meet him. His Excellency posted this in a communique. They are all valid now, and non una cuм. Deo gratias! 

Offline Romulus

  • Supporter
Re: Transalpine Redemptorists, valid?
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2025, 06:23:57 PM »
Bishop Pierre Roy sedevacantist conditionally ordained the rest of them. They flew to Canda to meet him. His Excellency posted this in a communique. They are all valid now, and non una cuм. Deo gratias!
Could you provide a link please?

Re: Transalpine Redemptorists, valid?
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2025, 01:56:05 AM »
Bishop Pierre Roy sedevacantist conditionally ordained the rest of them. They flew to Canda to meet him. His Excellency posted this in a communique. They are all valid now, and non una cuм. Deo gratias!


Shameless self confidence.

Thuc line has a grave doubt hanging over it.

Cannot be trusted.