CathInfo.com

This bolded quote has made me think, even before the thread. People were already talking about this in the FE topics, but the Carrington Event connection adds a bit more sense to it. I don't think I believe there are Nephilim buried under Antarctica, etc., but it might make sense if the PTB believe it will be one of the few livable places after the magnetic shift.

In The Adam and Eve Story, Chan proposed that the pole shift was much greater, as much as 90 degrees with the poles shifting into the equatorial zone in less than a day. Chan has proposed the poles would flip back and forth in this way so that Antarctica would eventually return to the South Pole region, and the Arctic would do likewise.



Difference from the CIA version:

Includes three additional chapters: Cataclysms Revisited, Conclusion, and The Author

Cataclysms Revisited from Page 63 to page 118, just prior to Conclusion India, Greece, Egypt and the entire end section.

In the early 1960s, Thomas Chan wrote a book titled The Adam and Eve Story and attempted to have it published by Emerson House in Los Angeles.

Soon after publishing the full issue, the CIA classified his book for 50 years. An FOIA lawsuit was filed against the CIA to release the book.

In 2013, the CIA released a "cleansed" version of the original book (50 pages out of 240 original pages).

The major difference to Hapgood's claims is that, according to Chan Thomas, the crust moved back to its original position within a relatively short time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cataclysmic_pole_shift_hypothesis

I looked up the book you mentioned and read this review:

Misrepresented as authored by Malachi Martin.
"The parts of the book written by Fr. Martin are great; however, those parts are a small and few. Most of the book consists of personal letters written by an enthusiastic fan writing TO Fr. Martin, which I found tedious."

Can you be more specific in this charge against Father Martin?

Incidentally, has anyone - except Isaiah in his mocking dirge for the Son of the Dawn - ever expressed the terrible ontological shipwreck that Lucifer achieved? I have copied out Boehme's paragraphs for quotation to penitents and to people undergoing both demonic obsession and demonic possession. Boehme expresses such disgust and contempt together with such bitter regret over the spoiling of Lucifer's original archangelic beauty and excellence. Boehme, by the way, strikes a very authentic note in not calling Lucifer an archangel but a member of the Second Choir of Angels (the Cherubim). p. 20
[...]
You have my particular thanks for responding to my question about spirit and spiritual. The parallels with the Kabbalah and the triple world of the Vedic tradition fit into this picture. I am still inclined to ascribe all such "traces" to the original Hermetic knowledge (Revelation?) which I have always thought of as the pre-Christ Christology. If I do not presuppose this, I find it difficult to account for such wisdom in so many diverse places and sources. Perhaps I must wait for the Beatific Vision in eternity before knowing the answer. p. 20
[...]
At the same time, I know that in this letter I have used language both exoteric and esoteric. Even before I entered all this, this year, I was thinking outside such bounds, especially when trying (Anselmwise) to understand for instance why Lord Jesus could realistically say, at the Last Supper before He died and rose and ascended, "This is My Body..." Or understand His words to Mary Magdalene in the Garden on Easter morn. Or how I can possibly be associated with Him in enacting Calvary at my daily Mass.
There are a thousand and one scintillations of truth opened up to me like precious diamonds in your scripts and your book as well as in your Jacob Boehme that you have become my benefactor under Christ's providence. All sorts of precious revelations. p. 22

Dear Wolfgang,

An immediate reaction to yours of December 15. When you mentioned Ibn Gebirol, I looked him up, and of course saw what you see. Boehme, Kabbalah and the Hermetic strain cannot be separated, as you say. The Rabbis realized that there was a special reason why the FIRST creation of God was Light: "Let there be light." And I know you read that last quotation from Book I of the Zohar in relation to the Prologue to the Fourth Gospel.
God, the Light, surely acted through Boehme, Rabbi Isaac and Ibn Gebirol and others. You now have a great opportunity to explain the unity of the mystical knowledge of the divine as distinct from the rational. I do believe John of the Cross with his doctrine of Light and Darkness belongs in this explication.
The Kabbalah connection is obvious. Interestingly, the root-word in Semitic, QBL, has the same basic signification as the Greek καταλαμβανο which John the Evangelist uses in regard to man’s incapacity/non-reception/rejection of the LIGHT. The Gematric value of ‘OR and RAS was important to the Rabbis. But the best among them used Gematric values, not as normative of meaning, but as confirmative.
In a previous letter I mentioned certain caveats and precautions in expounding this magnificent theme to a Roman Catholic audience. After the New Year’s beginning, let me drop you a few lines about this matter.

Blessings, again, on you and Thea.
Love,
Malachi p. 80