Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10

Author Topic: the тαℓмυdic anti-Pope  (Read 18678 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: the тαℓмυdic anti-Pope
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2024, 12:26:32 AM »
Jesus Christ against Jorge Bergoglio
 
 
Jorge says:
 
“t does not in any way follow that the Jews are excluded from God’s salvation because they do not believe in Jesus Christ as the Messiah of Israel and the Son of God,”
“The Gifts and the Calling of God are Irrevocable” Pontifical Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews.
 
Really? Jesus contradicts Jorge:
 
“Jesus answered: Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.”
 
"Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that confesseth the Son, hath the Father also."
Expectedly, the infallible and unchangeable Magisterium sides with Jesus against Jorge
 
 
“§714 The Most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews, and heretics, and schismatics, can ever be partakers of eternal life, but that they are to go into the eternal fire ‘which was prepared for the devil, and his angels,’ (Matthew 25:41) unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this Ecclesiastical Body, that only those remaining within this unity can profit from the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and that they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, alms deeds, and other works of Christian piety and duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved unless they abide within the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.”
 
Cantate Domino, from the infallible ecuмenical Council of Florence under His Holiness Pope Eugene IV defining the Solemn Doctrine: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (“Outside the Church, there is no salvation.”), promulgated by papal bull, February 4, 1444 [Florentine calendar] in Denziger, Enchiridion Symbolorum, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, § 714
 
…and against Jorge’s public practice of тαℓмυdic rites:
 
 
“§ 712 It [the Holy Catholic Church] firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosaic law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to Divine worship at that time, after our Lord’s coming had been signified by them, ceased, and the Sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally. Yet it does not deny that after the passion of Christ up to the promulgation of the Gospel they could have been observed until they were believed to be in no way necessary for salvation; but after the promulgation of the Gospel it asserts they cannot be observed without the loss of eternal salvation. All, therefore, who after that time observe circuмcision and the Sabbath and the other requirements of the law, it declares alien to the Christian faith and not in the least fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday they recover from these errors.”
 
Cantate Domino, from the infallible ecuмenical Council of Florence under His Holiness Pope Eugene IV defining the Solemn Doctrine: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (“Outside the Church, there is no salvation.”), promulgated by papal bull, February 4, 1444 [Florentine calendar] in Denziger, Enchiridion Symbolorum, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, § 712
 
the problem is not that Jorge associates with Jews, but that he confirms them in a religion that cannot save them.
 
He is even ashamed of letting them see Jesus, so he does not evangelize them; he hides his pectoral cross from them.
 
 
 

Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: the тαℓмυdic anti-Pope
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2024, 12:27:07 AM »
Ashamed of the Cross
 
Another sad day for Catholics
 
 
 
 
It is a habit with him.
 
 
“For he that shall be ashamed of me, and of my words, in this adulterous and sinful generation: the Son of man also will be ashamed of him, when he shall come in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.”
 
“For he that shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him the Son of man shall be ashamed, when he shall come in his majesty, and that of his Father, and of the holy angels.”
 
 

Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: the тαℓмυdic anti-Pope
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2024, 12:27:40 AM »
who are the Pharisees?
 
 
The Jews confess that they are followers of the Pharisees,
 
“The Jєωιѕн religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The тαℓмυd is the largest and most important single member of that literature, and round it are gathered a number of Midrashim, partly legal (Halachic) and partly works of edification (Haggadic). This literature, in its oldest elements, goes back to a time before the beginning of the Common Era, and comes down into the Middle Ages. Through it all run the lines of thought which were first drawn by the Pharisees, and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.”
Universal Jєωιѕн Encyclopedia, Vol. 3 pg. 474
 
“Pharisaism became тαℓмυdism, тαℓмυdism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.”
Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein, The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith, The Jєωιѕн Publication Society of America (1946) p. xxi
 
 
…but Jorge says faithful Catholics are “Pharisees.”
 
“One of the things which Francis does with regularity is to invert the teachings of the Church.  An example of this is the use of the term ‘pharisee’ which he applies to his enemies, who are not open to тαℓмυdic Judaism and Francis’ anti-Catholic machinations.”
the Rebbe explains the Hasidic stratagem of “descent for sake of ascent”
 
 
Pope at Santa Marta: There are Pharisees in the Church today like in the time of Jesus
 
…and whitewashes the Biblical Pharisees
 
Francis and the Pharisees: At Jews’ behest, Vatican Conference re-evaluates Christ’s Enemies
 
 
 
 
 

Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: the тαℓмυdic anti-Pope
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2024, 12:28:12 AM »
тαℓмυdic zingers from the anti-Pope
 
“God is purifying the church with sin”
 
“…the memory of him [Jesus] who has made himself sin, who has made himself the devil, the serpent, for us; he has humbled himself to the point of complete annihilation.”
 
“Inside the Holy Trinity they’re all arguing behind closed doors but on the outside they give the picture of unity.”
 
In a blasphemous reference to Our Always Sinless Blessed Mother and the Church, Jorge said: “The Church and the Virgin Mary are mothers, both of them; what is said of the Church can be said also of Our Lady and what is said of Our Lady can also be said of the Church!…All mothers have defects, we all have defects, but when we speak of our mother’s defects we gloss over them, we love her as she is. ”
General Audience, Vatican.va, Sep. 11, 2013
 
“I often think of Our Lady, when they handed down to her the dead body of her Son, covered with wounds, spat on, bloodied and soiled. And what did Our Lady do? ‘Did she carry him away?’ No, she embraced him, she caressed him. Our Lady, too, did not understand. Because she, in that moment, remembered what the Angel had said to her: ‘He will be King, he will be great, he will be a prophet...’; and inside, surely, with that wounded body lying in her arms, that body that suffered so before dying, inside surely she wanted to say to the Angel: ‘Liar! I was deceived.’ She, too, had no answers.”
Homily, Santa Marta, December 20, 2013
see also: “Pope: Silence Guards one’s Relationship with God”, Vatican Radio, Dec. 20, 2013
 
The infamously blasphemous medieval Toldot Yeschu was republished by Bergoglio’s friend, Chief Rabbi of Rome Ricardo Di Segni, under the misleading title Il vangelo del ghetto (The Gospel of the Ghetto), subtitled storie di Gesù (the history of Jesus) and described as “leggende e docuмenti della tradizione medievale ebraica” (legends and docuмents of the medieval Jєωιѕн tradition). What is that “Jєωιѕн tradition”?
 
The Toledot Yeschu embellishes the Torah's blasphemous mockery that Jesus was a mamzer [bastard] conceived adulterously in niddah [menstrual filth] by a Roman soldier named Pandera [Kallah 51a] of a whore [Sanhedrin 106a] and that He is now in Hell boiling in feces and, in some editions because Jesus is accused of sɛҳuąƖ perversion, semen [Gittin 57a], that the Sanhedrin justly executed Jesus because he was an idolater [Sanhedrin 43a] who worshipped a brick [Sanhedrin 67a], even boasting that the Sanhedrin overcame Roman opposition to the execution of Jesus [Sanhedrin 43a].
 
 
“…a priest that over weeks gives antisemitic talks until Jesus, on the cross, looks at the Virgin, who was at his side, and says to her,
'Mom, let's go since they don't like us;”
January 17, 2014

Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: the тαℓмυdic anti-Pope
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2024, 12:28:35 AM »
Heresy before putative elevation to the Chair of Peter—
Loss Of Papal Office Due To Heresy
cuм ex apostolatus officio
 
 
“In addition, that if ever at any time it shall appear that any… Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church… or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless…those thus promoted or elevated shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any further declaration, of all dignity, position, honour, title, authority, office and power.”
Pope Paul IV, cuм ex Apostolatus Officio, Feb. 15, 1559, §6 (Roman Bullarium Vol. IV. Sec. I, pp. 354-357)
 
Some argue that cuм ex Apostolatus Officio has never been abrogated.…
See: To what extent is Pope Paul IV’s « cuм ex apostolatus officio » still in effect?
From Rome, February 20, 2015,
 
…except that Pope Pius XII’s Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis §34 does appear to hold the effect of cuм ex Apostolatus Officio during a conclave election:
 
“34. No Cardinal, by pretext or reason of any excommunication, suspension, interdict or other ecclesiastical impediment whatsoever can be excluded in any way from the active and passive election of the Supreme Pontiff. Moreover, we suspend such censures for the effect only of this election, even though they shall remain otherwise in force.” (Cons. Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis, 8 December 1945)
 
However, as Fr. Cekada, the late sede vacantist, argued, ecclesiastical law is superseded by divine law:
 
“Heretics and schismatics are barred from the Supreme Pontificate by the divine law itself… [T]hey must certainly be regarded as excluded from occupying the throne of the Apostolic See, which is the infallible teacher of the truth of the faith and the center of ecclesiastical unity.” (Maroto, Institutiones I.C. 2:784)
 
“Appointment to the Office of the Primacy. 1. What is required by divine law for this appointment… Also required for validity is that the one elected be a member of the Church; hence, heretics and apostates (at least public ones) are excluded.” (Coronata, Institutiones I.C. 1:312)
 
“All those who are not impeded by divine law or by an invalidating ecclesiastical law are validly eligible [to be elected pope]. Wherefore, a male who enjoys use of reason sufficient to accept election and exercise jurisdiction, and who is a true member of the Church can be validly elected, even though he be only a layman. Excluded as incapable of valid election, however, are all women, children who have not yet arrived at the age of discretion, those afflicted with habitual insanity, heretics and schismatics.” (Wernz-Vidal, Jus Can. 2:415)
 
Thus heresy is not a mere “ecclesiastical impediment” or censure of the type that Pius XII enumerated and suspended in paragraph 34 of Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis. It is instead an impediment of divine law which Pius XII did not suspend — and indeed could not have suspended, precisely because it is one of divine law. [emphasis original to Fr. Cekada] http://www.fathercekada.com/2007/06/25/can-an-excommunicated-cardinal-be-elected-pope/
 
See also: Answering the Objections to the Sedevacantist Position
Compiled by Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI
 
and A manifestly heretic pope and the deception of an adulterated sources: A little Catechism on Sedevacantism* https://web.archive.org/web/20171115180547/http://catholicsinireland.ie/catholic-teaching-1/sedevacantism/deception-in-sspx-s-anti-sedevacantism-catechism/
 
*the SSPX promotion of the “Little Catechism on Sedevacantism is archived here.
 
 

Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
« previous next »