CathInfo.com

Why do all these bad mean liars keep saying Pius XII had weakness:

Fatima in Twilight also examines the roles of a line of Pontiffs in the Fatima Message, from Pius XI to John Paul II. Fellows illustrates, using extensive docuмentation, each Pope’s action and ultimate inaction concerning Fatima. It was in 1929, during the reign of Pius XI, that the Blessed Mother appeared to Sister Lucy at Tuy to ask for the consecration to be made: “The moment has come when God asks the Holy Father to make, in union with all the bishops of the world, the consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart, promising to save it by this means.”

Though the Fatima apparitions were approved in 1930, and the Holy Father both knew the part of the Secret concerning Russia’s errors and was fully aware of the diabolical state of Bolshevik  Russia,  he  did not consecrate that nation to the Immaculate Heart. He even  had  a  glimpse  of  Our Lady’s promised peace in Portugal, which was experiencing a Catholic restoration   through   its   own   consecration to the Immaculate Heart. However, it remained undone, and as Fellows asserts, “The consequences of Pius XI’s failure to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart were the Spanish cινιℓ ωαr and the Second World War”. (p. 71)

         It was during the reign of Pius XII that the first two parts of the Fatima Secret were made known to the public, and the world was consecrated to the Immaculate Heart. Fatima in Twilight details this Pope’s strengths and weaknesses [how dare he assert such a thing, he is attacking the Church, pardon the sarcasm. LoT] during his pontificate, especially concerning Fatima. Pius XII was responsible for many noteworthy things, including pronouncing the dogma of the Assumption and canonizing Saint Pius X, yet he did not fulfill his duty to the will of God as expressed through Fatima. This Pope possessed the Third Secret though he probably didn’t read it, witnessed a miracle of the sun himself, and was well aware of the requests made of him. Consequently, his inaction led to the part of Church history Fellows identifies as “Twilight”.

[Nope.  None of that can be true unless it is good.  Sarcasim again. LoT]

http://www.fatimaintwilight.com/Review.htm

The Twilight of the Church accelerated with the election of John XXIII to the throne of Peter and the Council he subsequently called. The book chronicles well the progressive forces alive and growing through the reigns of Pius XI and Pius XII, until their complete emergence during the Council.

Sedevacantism seems to have become to the number of Popes what Protestantism was to the books of Scripture. Everyone rejects 5, but Pope Pius XII is your epistle of St.James, whom some of you are divided about. Don't tell me it's only a personal judgment and doesn't affect faith or practice at all, unless you accept their Papal authority, unless you accept all the doctrinal content of their Encyclicals and all the binding nature of their liturgical laws and discipline. It isn't simply a historical matter anymore. There are very important doctrines these Popes from Benedict XV to Pope Pius XII have written about that you must believe.

Disputaciones, well for one, apart from the continued condemnations of modernism and Communism, the numerous Marian pronouncements both of the ordinary Magisterium (Mediatrix of all graces, Co redemptrix by Pope Benedict XV) and the extraordinary Magisterium (culminating in the dogma of the Assumption by Pope Pius XII) come to mind. Also several doctrines in the field of Catholic social teaching and economics (by Pope Pius XI etc) as well as the rights of Christ the King and formulating the Christian response to social ills, race and class hatred the problems of war and hostilities between nations and a whole host of challenges faced in the modern world. One could add highly important and significant teachings in the field of ecclesiology and of the episcopate, Apoostolicity, jurisdiction etc settling longstanding theological disputes.

The Papacy of these Popes is a dogmatic fact. You can't treat the Catholic faith as a theological free for all where we pick and choose what to believe or what Popes to accept as in a cafeteria of religion. If one spreads propaganda about these Popes, inducing and inciting the Christian faithful to mistrust them, can he guarantee that these traditional doctrines will survive? Or perhaps his sedevacantism is not really anymore about his sincere concern about Catholic doctrine anymore but has morphed into something else.