Author Topic: SSPX: A Spectacular Reading from the Pulpit (Read 5101 times)

Caminus · « **Reply #25 on:** March 26, 2012, 01:43:19 PM »

Why's that?

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #26 on:** March 26, 2012, 01:46:41 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote from: bernadette
http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/homepage/the-vatican/detail/articolo/lefebvriani-lefebvrians-lefebrianos-13844/

Quote
Mgr. Fellay himself had said that there were no real difficulties in terms of the acceptance of “the profession of the faith” and of the whole preamble, which states that the Second Vatican Council is to be interpreted according to the hermeneutics proposed by Benedict XVI.

And we wonder why they don't tell us what it says. So they can do a hat trick. And then the SSPX fanatics will tell us there's no contradiction with their previous position. Sounds like the position of Benedict XVI on Vatican II. Which apparently they will be agreeing with.

So what was the point of forming the SSPX again?

I'm an SSPX fanatic, but I see a HUUUUUGE contradiction.

If this is what they really have to agree to.

Which would of course be impossible to accept.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #27 on:** March 26, 2012, 01:47:54 PM »

Quote

which states that the Second Vatican Council is to be interpreted according to the hermeneutics proposed by Benedict XVI.

If this is what the preamble says, and the SSPX accepts it, then what was the point of Si Si Non Non, the Angelus, the endless sermons of the SSPX on these matters?

Was it just to manipulate people and corral people until they were ready to accept Vatican II according to the hermeneutics of Father Ratzinger?

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #28 on:** March 26, 2012, 02:10:30 PM »

Quote from: Caminus

Why's that?

Because it is outrageous to assume that the SSPX "reconciling" with Rome would be good. Not until Rome converts to Tradition first. I think Archbishop LeFebvre summed it up nicely:

"If they excommunicate us, we shall consider ourselves excommunicated from Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ". -Archbishop LeFebvre

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #29 on:** March 26, 2012, 02:10:37 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote
which states that the Second Vatican Council is to be interpreted according to the hermeneutics proposed by Benedict XVI.

If this is what the preamble says, and the SSPX accepts it, then what was the point of Si Si Non Non, the Angelus, the endless sermons of the SSPX on these matters?

Was it just to manipulate people and corral people until they were ready to accept Vatican II according to the hermeneutics of Father Ratzinger?

1) Regarding your first sentence: Bravo!

2) Regarding your 2nd sentence: No, it would be because Bishop Fellay does not agree with ABL's principle that there shall be no discussion of practical solutione before the doctrinal issues are resolved.