Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Sister Lucy investigation results are in!  (Read 2862 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Re: Sister Lucy investigation results are in!
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2018, 05:23:45 PM »
Does the technology take into account the aging of the person? I've never heard of any technology that can be 100% definitive because that obstacle is always in the way. 


Re: Sister Lucy investigation results are in!
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2018, 08:27:30 PM »
I never focused much on the possibility that there was a fake Lucia.  For those that have, what does this mean for the Novus Ordo?  The story of Fatima?

Re: Sister Lucy investigation results are in!
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2018, 08:40:32 PM »
Is this finding surprising to anyone?  Except for poche, of course.

Re: Sister Lucy investigation results are in!
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2018, 09:34:42 PM »
I never focused much on the possibility that there was a fake Lucia.  For those that have, what does this mean for the Novus Ordo?  The story of Fatima?
.
Some will blame sedes for the division in this topic but I think that's not entirely fair.
.
From the standpoint of defending Tradition, sedes and other trads (sedes are trads IMHO) are on the same side of this, opposed to Novus Ordo lies and pretension. From our standpoint, it looks bad for the Newchurch leaders who have now been accused of perpetrating an elaborate hoax. The implications are far-reaching. In order for Newchurch to have perpetrated this hoax, they had to meticulously plan events such that the truth could be suppressed, most likely using Communist tactics, I.E., this is an example of the "errors of Russia" put into practice where it counts.
.
As for the story of Fatima, it would seem the larger topic is the Message of Fatima, because it's not just a "story." 
.
Regarding the Message of Fatima, now all the purported writings and quotes of Sr. Lucia after the key date (when would that be, 1958?) must be set aside and viewed with great scrutiny since they might be fake too, that is, they might not be what she said or wrote but what they would have led us to believe she said or wrote.
.