Santo Subito, with all due respect, your post is a primary example of why people should get the heck out of the Vatican II church. You used nothing but illogical fallacies in an attempt to support your overall absurd claim.
John Lane and Fr. Cekada have as much authority to judge rites of the Church as your postman.
So when you defend the NO, aren't you making the same judgements? Isn't that a double standard?
You need to apply the same skepticism and cynicism you have for the NO to their arguments. It is undeniable that they have a vested interest in saying NO rites aren't valid as they want to funnel people towards Sede chapels exclusively. Preferably their Sede chapel. It is Protestantism all over again.
You're lying here. John Lane is a layman who lives in Australia, first of all, so do you really think he's going to try to lure people to the chapel he attends? And if you want the definition of Protestantism, go to the Bogus Ordo.
The dilemma you find yourself in should be a red flag that somewhere along the way there is a flaw in your reasoning.
Ditto.
Even the Society admits NO rites are valid.
...provided, of course, that the priest offering it has the proper intentions, though even then there is no gaurantee it's valid. Either way, the Society says that it's a mortal sin to attend the NO if you know it's wrong. And it is wrong.
I think you sell Our Lord short. He left us an indefectible, visible, hierarchical Church that will last to the end of time. This Church must have valid rites when they are approved for use by the universal Church.
The Traditional Latin Mass is a valid rite. In fact, it is THE rite of the Church. The Bogus Ordo is exactly what its name implies: bogus.
Read "The Great Facade". You'll see that this Crisis is a facade of optional novelties binding on no one. There have been severe crises in the Church before and Catholics did not become Sedes, except the Protestants who rejected the Papacy and the Pope.
That is flat out illogical. The crisis is that there is a sacreligious mass, that the true Mass is limited, and that the Dogmas of the Church have been tossed aside along with Tradition thanks to the modernists and heretics who were responsible for Vatican II. That's precisely what the Third Secret was about. But I know, you Bogus Ordites think it was about JPII getting shot. He survived that gun shot, so why would that be of enough significance to be a Secret of Fatima? You are falling for lies from satan.
And the reason people didn't become sedes during prior crisises is because the Papacies of the Popes during that time were not questionable, because they weren't responsible for the crisis!
Only the devil wants you living like this. He's playing you like a violin appealing to your anger, pride, and fears to isolate you from the sacraments, have you hate the visible Church and lead yourself and your family into despair and a loss of Faith.
I think it's the other way around. The devil is playing people like you, fooling you into believing everything is a-ok in the Church today; That Vatican II was a true council and that the NO is a valid Mass with no errors.
You'll have my prayers as well, Santo. You probably need them even more than Jim does.
Topic: Pray for me, as I struggle through the crisis (Read 3758 times)