This is why I hold that JP2 did more harm than Bergoglio. True Catholics recognize Bergoglio for the non-Catholic fraud that he is, but JP2 and B16 had people fooled because they presented a facade of Catholicism.
JP2 upheld Traditional Catholic MORAL teaching very strongly. So many well-meaning Catholics were duped into thinking that he was orthodox, and more readily swallowed the heresies of religious indifferentism that he pushed left and right.
B16 preached in Latin and played the part of a conservative, but he was as Modernist as they came. But people were more inclined to swallow the Modernist aspects of his teaching and less likely to detect them when presented to them alongside of actual Catholic teaching.
You hide the bitter medicine inside of something sweet and delicious, to hide the taste, to get a child to swallow. That's what JP2 and B16 did.
And the TLM in the Novus Ordo is the same thing. You can have a Latin Mass but then find the priest getting up there injecting all manner of Modernist thinking into his sermons, which the people could readily confuse for Catholicism since it is being delivered in the Catholics context of the TLM.
There is LITERALLY no such thing as pure evil. Pure evil by definition (quite literally) does not exist. Everything that exists has some good in it, some truth. So simply because the Novus Ordo in the TLM exhibits some truth, this does not mean that it is integrally Catholic. You can find even Anglican who have a Traditional-looking liturgy (the "High Church" ones) ... but it's infested with their heresy and schism. And ironically, the MORE good there is in something, the more dangerous it is, because it's more effective at delivering the evil that comes along with it. If something is 99% Catholic, the 1% non-Catholic can easily be injected into someone's mind. And that's where the damage is done. Then you add another % here, another there, and before you know it, the frog of Catholic faith has been boiled to death.