Author Topic: Objections and Replies Page For Sister Lucy Truth (Read 898 times)

Mr G · « **on:** October 28, 2019, 10:09:08 AM »

http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2019/10/new-objections-and-replies-page-for.html

New Objections and Replies Page For Sister Lucy Truth. Read, also, Our Analysis of the the Bizarre 1993 Interview with Sister Lucy II . See Her Contradict EVERYTHING SISTER LUCY HAD PREVIOUSLY SAID.

- October 26, 2019

We have published an analysis of the bizarre 1992–1993 interviews in light of the undeniable scientific evidence of an impostor Sr. Lucy

Sister Lucy Truth (SLT) has prepared and published a new section on our website called "The Contradictions," dedicated to highlighting the contradictions of the post-1967 Sr. Lucy. The first page of analysis is on the bizarre 1992–1993 interviews translated and published by Carlos Evaristo.

The preparation and publication of this material is ongoing. We will email our subscribers when new pages go up and also publish posts on our Facebook page.

You may also anticipate a formal response to common objections against SLT, to be published soon.

Please pray for this project and the triumph of the Immaculate Heart!

Copyright © 2019 Sr. Lucy Truth Project, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Sr. Lucy Truth Project
4104 N Murray Dr
Otis Orchards, WA 99027-9725

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Responses to the main criticisms and objections against SLT and the now scientifically proven theory of an impostor.

See our new webpage: https://sisterlucyimposter.org/objections-and-responses/

When the hypothesis of two Sr. Lucys was proposed over a decade ago by different individuals, many criticisms naturally and immediately arose. But with Sister Lucy Truth and the irrefutable scientific evidence we have produced, this is a whole new ball game.

Most current objections rely on outdated or inaccurate assumptions about our scientific and expert evidence. Nevertheless, some objections die hard, and it's understandable that people will have reservations about how radical the existence of an impostor Sr. Lucy is. We have prepared responses to the main objections based on the best information we currently have. As time goes by, as new reports come in, as new discoveries are made, we will be able to refine our answers and understanding of the mysteries that remain to be solved in the life and identity of Sr. Lucia of Fatima.

https://sisterlucyimposter.org/objections-and-responses/

Please spread these responses and this work. We invite feedback.

Above all, pray for the triumph of the Immaculate Heart!

Yeti · « **Reply #1 on:** November 02, 2019, 02:39:14 PM »

Excellent! There was a guy on here a while back who gave several interesting and plausible objections to the Imposter Sister Lucy theory, such as that her family apparently never publicly denied the new Sr. Lucy was the real deal. I think it may have been Stubborn? I do believe in the Sister Lucy Hoax theory, but the objections this person made were very compelling and it would be nice if they could be addressed on their website.

Mark 79 · « **Reply #2 on:** November 02, 2019, 03:07:12 PM »

10. Wouldn’t Sr. Lucy’s family or relatives or the nuns of her convent have known that she was an impostor?
[color=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7)]Firstly, we don’t know what Sr. Lucy’s family, relatives, or nuns “knew” about her, and barring the revelation of some unknown confession, we may never know. However, there are some truths we do know. The scientific and medical evidence we have is irrefutable. All the logistical difficulties of how an impostor could be introduced are secondary details that remain to be discovered. However, we know that the relatives were never allowed to see Sr. Lucy face-to-face but always behind the grille and in the presence of other sisters of the community. Hence there was no opportunity for intimate or in-depth conversation.[/color]
[color=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7)]If it is true that the Church replaced Sr. Lucy with an impostor, if it is possible that the Church was overrun by Communists and Freemasons, is it not also reasonable to believe that these thugs acting in the name of the Church exerted pressure on Sr. Lucy’s relatives to remain silent and pretend as if nothing were happening? This isn’t proof that there was an impostor. It is simply stating that we should not be surprised that a cover up would involve tying up the loose ends with whatever threats or means necessary.[/color]

Yeti · « **Reply #3 on:** November 02, 2019, 03:23:54 PM »

Thank you! I will have to go through this site and find the other objections he made. It was a list of about ten different things. In true Thomistic fashion, I think it is good to address the strongest arguments of the other side, and these seemed pretty solid, though of course I disagree with the conclusion.

In any case, replacing a cloistered nun with an imposter doesn't seem all that difficult of a task anyway. You're talking about someone who lives a secretive life and only comes out about once per decade to give an interview or appear on TV, and when she does come out she is covered with a habit that obscures her entire body including even a good part of her face. You don't exactly need CGI or Hollywood special effects artists to create a double for someone in that condition of life.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Objections and Replies Page For Sister Lucy Truth (Read 898 times)

Mr G

Objections and Replies Page For Sister Lucy Truth

Yeti

Re: Objections and Replies Page For Sister Lucy Truth

Mark 79

Re: Objections and Replies Page For Sister Lucy Truth

Yeti

Re: Objections and Replies Page For Sister Lucy Truth