Now however, like so many Trad Inc. R&R types, the SSPX is openly attacking sedevacantism:

https://youtu.be/tktlEwHFQAk?feature=shared

WHY???

Funny how you say this sermon is attacking sedeism, seemed almost more like a nothing burger to me. All he did was give a short,  elementary talk about what sedeism amounts to. At my SSPX chapel we had a much better sermon on sedeism this past Sunday. 
 

Had you read the title of this thread to the end uou would have seen thd word "poorly" to describe this.

Dogmatic sedevacantism is as annoying as R&R. Nuanced sedevacantism and sedeprivationism are legitimate, logical opinions.

Anyone else hear one? Wonder if there was a memo sent out

Here's a little interesting story for you:  Remember when the SSPX had that Damage Control Conference called "Resistance To What?" It was around the time the SSPX Resistance was just getting started and they tried to keep as many SSPX members as possible away from any and all Resistance priests and chapels. Well I listened to the entire Q&A session of that conference and it PROVED that the majority of the SSPX laity have indeed been "brainwashed" by the SSPX clergy and other officials.

If you go back and listen to the Q&A session of that conference, you can hear one lay member stand up and actually say these words: "Is it okay if I ask......" Now that right there is proof positive that this layman was frightened to even ASK a question to the panel members who organized and ran this conference. No grown man should ask if it's okay to simply ask a question.

And that's not all. When a layman began speaking (it might have even been the same layman who asked permission to ask a question... I forget because it's been so long since I listened to it), a panel member quickly stopped him during a sentence and said "Wait! Be careful!" as if to warn him either NOT to say something that would be damaging to their position against the Resistance or NOT to finish his statement because the panel member sensed a statement or question was coming that the panel did not want to address at all. It was a very quick damage control move on the part of the SSPX panel members and I never forgot how "shady" and "cult-like mind-controlling" that behavior seemed to be.

It was then that I realized the following:

1. That the SSPX faculty were merely doing damage control and were never interested in truthfully addressing all of the questions the SSPX laity had concerning the Resistance in the first place;
2. The SSPX faculty had instilled fear into its members so much so that a grown man was afraid to even ask a question about the Resistance; and
3. The SSPX was in the wrong when a panel member actually tried to censor a layman's questioning statements. That proved the SSPX had something to hide and that it wasn't comfortable at all with having an open panel discussion (which it claimed to be having through this "Resistance To What?" Conference)

I might go back and listen to that Q&A section again because it is very revealing in that it shows what the SSPX will resort to in order to keep their flock in line. It's amazing how practically none of the SSPX members in attendance addressed the sleazy verbal tactics of the panel.

Check it out and hear for yourself.