What is the purpose of this thread? I think we all agree Leo XIV is Francis II in Benedict XVI’d clothes. Dredging up dirt on someone’s ancestors is unnecessary. Leo XIV’s words and actions speak for themselves.
People need to exercise some reading comprehension, and stop gaslighting with fake / pretended sanctimonious sentiments of "charity". I'm so tired of the pseudo-piety here while at the same time ironically casting slanderous uncharitable aspersions at the one posting the information. I'm so fed up with the fake / pretended posturing for charity and what Bishop Williamson would call "nitheness" and "chawity" ... and that's even IF this thread had violated any principles of charity despite your gaslighting.
Read it again. We could perhaps see the work of Divine Providence in the fact that THE first obvious heresy taught by Bergoglio was related to adultery, and here we have the hand-picked successor of Bergoglio, famous in the world as "Robert Prevost" ... a name that was CONCEIVED IN ADULTERY. It's a FAKE NAME that was invented precisely so that his ancestor could run cover for and escape the consequences of his adulter. That's EXACTLY what
Amoris Laetitia did ... provide an OUT for people who are living in adultery and give them cover for their sin.
If you can't see the ironic work of Divine Providence here, then you are rather dense ... and instead you gaslight me for lacking charity by simply pointing out this stunning coincidence.
Pointing this out is similar to how the Dimond Brothers pointed out the striking correlation between the false High Priests during the time of the Maccabees and various characteristics of the Conciliar popes.
Topic: Prevost, thy name is adultery ... (Read 6784 times)