Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Neo SSPX SPARKS cινιℓ ωαr OVER VACCINE PASSPORTS  (Read 9178 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Neo SSPX SPARKS cινιℓ ωαr OVER VACCINE PASSPORTS
« Reply #40 on: September 29, 2021, 10:06:17 AM »
No one has pointed out that the SSPX letter only quotes the modernist Catechism, which they themselves told me what it is and that it undermines my Catholic Faith??? I’d like to write Fr. Fullerton and tell him what a mess this has become.
Very good observation. Thanks. (P.S. - I have not read one word of what he wrote. What for? He is a just another blind guide.)

Re: Neo SSPX SPARKS cινιℓ ωαr OVER VACCINE PASSPORTS
« Reply #41 on: September 29, 2021, 10:23:58 AM »
He wrote that the Church authorities have said that one may use the covid vaccines if there are very serious reasons, but then he included that sentence from dignitatis humanae that talks about not being forced to against your conscience, as an ad hominum argument. He doesn't agree with taking the vaccine at all, but he included that paragraph because your employer will most probably bring up how the Pope approves of the vaccine.

Forgive my skepticism, but why is he endorsing an exemption letter which  contains teachings he allegedly opposes?

According to your interpretation, his letter is arguing with itself, first articulating what he admits/alleges is Catholic teaching about allowing abortion-tainted vaccines in certain circuмstances (appoint you are in denial on), then quoting DH to say, apparently, those Catholics who object to what he just called Catholic teaching (?!?), their unCatholic, erroneous consciences must be respected.

I suspect that if I corner him, and ask whether it is ever permissible to take abortive vaccines, he will say yes.

if his position is no, he needs to chop out the portion of his letter which contradicts him.

As it stands, that letter has little value for the accomplishment of its stated purpose.


Re: Neo SSPX SPARKS cινιℓ ωαr OVER VACCINE PASSPORTS
« Reply #42 on: September 30, 2021, 02:20:17 AM »
The exemption letter from Fr. Robinson now making the rounds in the SSPX also acknowledges that the “vaccine” can be licitly received in certain circuмstances, making it, from the employers perspective, worthless (and conceding a disputed point, difficult for many faithful to use).  It is therefore pretty much worthless for use with any employer sharing Gov. Hochul’s position (ie., “Even the Pope says it’s OK.”).
IMO shouldn't even call it an "exemption" letter, it's just a way to put a target on your back without actually accomplishing anything.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Neo SSPX SPARKS cινιℓ ωαr OVER VACCINE PASSPORTS
« Reply #43 on: September 30, 2021, 08:15:08 AM »
The exemption letter from Fr. Robinson now making the rounds in the SSPX also acknowledges that the “vaccine” can be licitly received in certain circuмstances, making it, from the employers perspective, worthless (and conceding a disputed point, difficult for many faithful to use).  It is therefore pretty much worthless for use with any employer sharing Gov. Hochul’s position (ie., “Even the Pope says it’s OK.”).

Indeed, a religious exemption letter basically saying that there are no solid religious principles behind refusing the vaccine.  Utterly worthless.

"I am seeking a religious exemption based on the fact that it says here that the vaccine may be licitly received."

Re: Neo SSPX SPARKS cινιℓ ωαr OVER VACCINE PASSPORTS
« Reply #44 on: September 30, 2021, 08:22:15 AM »
Indeed, a religious exemption letter basically saying that there are no solid religious principles behind refusing the vaccine.  Utterly worthless.

"I am seeking a religious exemption based on the fact that it says here that the vaccine may be licitly received."

Yep.  The letter basically says you’re asking your employer for an exemption from your religion, in order to be exempt from the jab.