Author Topic: Marian Apparitions seem to deny Sede (Read 4082 times)

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #15 on:** October 02, 2009, 03:27:39 PM »

Quote from: Belloc

She said consecrate in 1960...

Please show us the quote wherein she said any such thing, Belloc.

Jackass.

Caminus · « **Reply #16 on:** October 02, 2009, 04:56:13 PM »

The third secret was to be revealed no later than 1960.

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #17 on:** October 02, 2009, 09:43:50 PM »

Quote from: Caminus

The third secret was to be revealed no later than 1960.

Indeed. Belloc thanks you for saving him the embarrassment of having to post that.

Now, Belloc, my hopefully-more-mellow friend, would you care to discuss your original idea in a calm, respectable manner, or would you like to hastily post something that will, unbeknown to you, likely contain more ammunition for my weapons?

CM · « **Reply #18 on:** October 03, 2009, 06:40:57 AM »

Kids these days.

Lover of Truth · « **Reply #19 on:** October 03, 2009, 06:18:50 PM »

Quote from: ProphecyFilm.com

Most so called Marian apparitions in our century that acknowledge Vatican II, the new mass and the current antipope have even been condemned by Vatican II it self. So horrible have them been and so bad that even the apostate church condemns them. And all of these apparitions have contained clear heresy, such as medjugorje and bayside among others.

If you want to go to private revelations to backup your preconceived notions how about going to one's approved by the Church. You know, Lourdes, Fatima, La Sallete:

"Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the anti-Christ."

Akita is not approved by the Church .