Right. I think his point, though, was that if they did in fact noticed it immediately, as they now claim, why not give an explanation before publishing the video? ANSWER: because they clearly did NOT notice the problem right away like they claim.
They may have noticed before they put out the video. Remember 10 year old girl productions.... Perhaps she didn't get the memo not to post it. Then it was quickly taken down.
.
Moot point, though.
.
The consecration was invalid. Fr. Pfeiffer admitted such. To prove the conditional consecration is valid, a video is needed.