Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Was the Denzinger tampered with?  (Read 3979 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
« Reply #45 on: August 27, 2021, 11:57:40 AM »
The original Douay-Rheims Bible in old English is available on archive.org:

1610 A.D. Douay Old Testament, 1582 A.D. Rheims New Testament

Scroll down for download links (PDF, PDF with text, ...)
Yes, thank you! 

Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
« Reply #46 on: November 20, 2021, 11:05:30 PM »
Does anyone have a link to the most recent Denzinger before Rahner started editing it? PDF or TXT or a link is fine.


Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
« Reply #47 on: November 20, 2021, 11:59:01 PM »

Re: Was the Denzinger tampered with?
« Reply #48 on: November 21, 2021, 12:35:52 PM »
I have the 30th Edition of Denzinger with a corrigenda and, as far as I'm concerned, most or all Trads use this edition even though it has Karl Rahner's name in it.

If anyone claims that this edition of Denzinger is bad or corrupted, then can they please cite a few specifics? Again, it's not that I don't believe them it's just that I would like a few specifics. We all know that subsequent editions of Denzinger (post 1954;1957) omitted Pope Pius IX's "Quanta Cura" for obvious reasons. 

Again, can anyone list a few specifics which show the 30th edition of Denzinger is either bad or corrupted? Thanks.