CathInfo.com

I think some people have difficulty living with uncertainty, and cook this stuff up to “make it all better.”

I will continue to impress upon all the glaring fact that this theory was unknown for 60 years, until hatched by an obscure sedevacantist.

One surely would have expected Br. Michael of the Holy Trinity (the world’s foremost Fatima historian, per his 3-volume book) to have delved into some of the areas posited in support of this theory, yet it all seems to have escaped him?  Not likely.

The first time I had heard of the "Two Sister Lucias" theory was probably 8 or 9 years ago.  I too thought it was nuts because at the time I was a supporter of the Fatima Crusader.  It was Tradition in Action (not sede) who first made me aware of it.  But it was actually the Dimonds who first realized there was a problem way back in the early 2000s.  I continued to think it was nuts even after I became a convinced sede in late 2013.  The reason I didn't believe the TSL theory was because there were some plausible explanations about why the early Lucy and the later Lucy looked so different. e.g. dental surgery and/or aging.  And it was easy to dismiss the Dimonds and TIA because they are not professionals in the fields of facial recognition.  So they could easily be mistaken.  But Dr. Chojnowski took it to another level.  He hired professionals to do the analysis and they all agreed that it is two different people.  The evidence is overwhelming.  It's no longer at the level of some obscure sede cooking up a nutty theory.  It is proven by professional analysis.  It's a game-changer.  The whole narrative is being transformed.  Fatima was the most significant event in the 20th century for Catholics.  The next most significant event was V2.  The pre-V2 message of Fatima is totally different from the post-V2 message.  And the TSL theory is the explanation for why that happened.  And the TSL theory also supports the idea that we didn't get the whole secret in 2000.  The 2nd Sr Lucy is a fraud and a deceiver.
The next phase of the investigation will involve trying to figure out who the 2nd Sister Lucy really was.  I expect that will be a dangerous task.  The Conciliar Church is pretty much a mafia and they will not appreciate anyone trying to uncover their secrets.

It's one of the biggest hoaxes in human history, it deceived so many many Catholics and led them to relax and become soft. Today there are still many Catholics believe the consecration has been accepted by Our Lady. The fact that the world has been getting worse and worse did not wake them up, shows how super gullible some people are.

The "term "diabolical disorientation" has been thought NOT to have come from the real Sister Lucy considering the timeline. Still the "secret' and machinations around it impacts all that was mentioned.

Yes, that is my point.  The fake Sister Lucy said it.  To accept that a fake Lucy said this means they can't use it to explain their R&R cognitive dissonance.