Yes

https://www.bizapedia.com/la/blessed-virgin-mary-our-hope.html

b. Zendejas has been associated with Fr. Morel since 2018?

Is Fr. Morel still alive?

.
The address in question is a (now vacant?) local grocer. It doesn't seem to have been used as a house of worship at any point. Is that a business or property owned by Fr Morel (I've always understood he was financially independent even prior to becoming a priest)? Where is his actual chapel?

#5-Given the significant revenue and the concentration of property holdings, it is reasonable for observers and contributors to seek transparency on funding sources and the allocation of resources. This information is presented strictly from publicly available filings and county records

You have demonstrated that you have no understanding of how to read financial statements. You don't encourage  "transparency and accountability" by combining assets (without liabilities) and revenue (without expenses) to arrive at misleading final number, as you have done.

You are just muddying the waters. You don't even know how an Asset differs from Revenue, you just add the two together and call it a day. You are financially clueless.

You imply that Bishop Zendejas currently has some huge sum at his disposal to spend as he wishes. In another thread, you suggested that someone contact Bishop Zendejas to pay for a Church in Africa. What exactly is your agenda?

You say Bishop Z's NY building was formerly a Jєωιѕн ѕуηαgσgυє? What does this have to do with his finances? Nothing. You are trying to blacken Bishop Z's name by throwing out innuendo.

Bishop Zendejas is not currently sitting on a huge pile of money. Most of his Assets are buildings, his chapels and related buildings. He cannot sell those buildings to generate cash to give to the African priest or whatever cause you think up. But you don't seem to understand that. Or you are just here trying to stir up trouble. Which is it?

Right off the bat, Bp Z purchased a property near the Gulf Coast of Texas about 10 years ago -- it even included land.

It wasn't crazy expensive -- about the same price as a house in some parts of the country. This is Texas -- land is relatively cheap.

BUT right away, within a couple years, the land had doubled in value. It's been 7 or 8 years since I heard that.
Why did it increase? Well, developers started buying up acreage up and down Delaney Rd to build subdivisions. That massively increases the value of land in the area. Do you KNOW how much you make when you subdivide a parcel of land into dozens or hundreds of brand new $250,000 homes?
Men become RICH, as in (((rich))), doing that.

Children might not understand, but "land" or "property" doesn't make you wealthy. You can't eat or spend land. Money doesn't literally grow on trees!
Unless you have some way to farm the land or something, it's just a roof over your head, and a field to look at and relax in.
The Appraisal District (or Zillow, Realtor.com, etc.) can say it's worth $5 million, but that doesn't make a BMW appear in your garage, nor does it magically stuff your wallet with $100 bills or give you gold teeth.

Net worth and income are two VERY different things.

At any rate, unless you bought property(ies) in Detroit or other manufacturing-heavy cities, for the most part, real estate has only gone UP for the past 30 years. There have been ups and downs -- but anyone from GenX or older who owns property probably has seen an increase in their investment. Frankly, the same could be said of the Stock Market.
YES, it's QUITE possible we could have a financial collapse or Day of Reckoning at some point -- but that point has not entered reality just yet.

You have made several claims about my knowledge and intentions, but none of that changes the basic point. The figures I referenced come directly from the IRS Form 990 filings for Sapientia Association, Inc. and Sapientia Education Association, Inc. on ProPublica. Those filings show that in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021 Sapientia Association reported 1,287,603 dollars in revenue, and in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021 Sapientia Education reported 953,957 dollars in revenue. Those numbers are not my interpretation. They are taken directly from the organizations own IRS submissions.

You have said that I implied someone is sitting on eight million dollars. That is not accurate. I quoted the revenue and net income figures that the organizations themselves reported to the IRS. Nothing more. Nothing less.

You also said the ѕуηαgσgυє history is irrelevant. It was mentioned only because the property appears in public records under Sapientia. That is a matter of public record as well. There was no innuendo attached to it.

If you believe the filings are misleading or paint an incomplete picture, that is a separate discussion. The filings are public and they show what they show. Any reasonable person reviewing sudden revenue spikes of that size would ask where the money came from and how it was allocated. That is not an accusation. That is a normal question based on publicly reported information.

Nothing I have said goes beyond what the organizations themselves submitted to the IRS. If transparency and accountability are good things, then pointing to publicly filed financial data should not be a problem.

The filings are not misleading nor do they paint an incomplete picture. You are one suggesting that. But you need to understand that you have been looking at a summary of a tax return. You need to look at the tax return itself before you imply that Bishop Z is not being transparent.

If you want to see the details of everything on the tax return to satisfy your concerns, there is a little box out to the right of each year's tax summary on that ProPublica page. In that box, you can click a link to look at each schedule of the tax return for that year. It is not Bishop Z's fault that you don't know how to access the Tax return data that is right there for you to look at.

If you have more questions, you can hire an accountant to go through it with you, I suppose. But whatever you do, don't try to interpret the tax return yourself. You are clearly not qualified.