what`s wrong with this?
Nothing in itself...I just think it will surprise some. Others will take Fr. Cekada to task...but I will need to see him refuted because his argument seems airtight to me.
And what problem will that solve?
It's understandable that many Trads bought into this argument because there seems to be no way that a true pope would do what Paul VI did. However,
in perpetuity just means the law will continue with no definite end date. It does not mean it can never be changed.