Author Topic: Dimonds getting debunked video by video? (Read 53735 times)

roscoe · « **Reply #60 on:** April 30, 2010, 12:53:16 AM »

Not scrutinising the posts of L that much I had missed the remark but I am not surprised by it, :smoke-pot:

I have not had him on IG because he is just boring and incompetent but not offensive.

umblehay anmay · « **Reply #61 on:** April 30, 2010, 01:23:33 AM »

One of the reasons some independent Priests refuse to follow the SSPX in using the 62 Missal is that it was the first step in the slippery slope down to the acceptence of N.O.

A point the Dimonds make that has a loose correlation to this is that the acceptance and promotion of very mild and veiled versions of "invincible ignorance" and BOD through the late 1800's until V2 paved the way to the acceptance of the full blown "All Dogs Go to Heaven" indifference allowed by the New Church theologians.

The only real difference is that the V2 religion comes right out an praises the false religions whereas the BOD'ers in the trad movement simply admit the same outcome without praising the heretical and apostate groups outright.

Caminus · « **Reply #62 on:** April 30, 2010, 08:23:54 AM »

It is even more amazing that people speak of two extremely ignorant, inept vicious kids as if their word is some kind of authority. I guess having a website and wearing costumes really can fool people these days. It just screams, "Hey, I'm important!"

sedetrad · « **Reply #63 on:** April 30, 2010, 08:28:13 AM »

I think they may be ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.

Caminus · « **Reply #64 on:** April 30, 2010, 08:28:41 AM »

He even looks mildly retarded.