They surely have.

You have no idea what you're talking about.  Dimond Brothers have never held that "all Trad Sacraments are invalid".  They've certainly held that most (nearly all) Trad groups have embraced and promoted heresy, but that has nothing whatsoever do do with the validity of their Sacraments.  They obviously realize that it would be heretical to claim that heretics cannot have valid Sacraments.

It is my understanding that they no longer assist at any mass, but I do not believe it is because they think the trad sacraments are "invalid".  At best, if they are truly "home-aloners", then they would think the sacraments are "illicit" and that it would be a mortal sin to assist at one.

Your understanding is correct.

https://twitter.com/AntiDimondWatch/status/1766483615662125439

So St. John Bosco did 'magic' tricks. I don't think every trick is demonic though many magicians do make demonic pacts.

Do you have a point?  Dimonds clearly stated right out of the gate that not all “magic” involves diabolical forces.  You’re creating a strawman here by implying that they believe this.

At least 95% of what they show on the video is almost certainly diabolical … short of camera tricks and “audiences” that were completely in on it.  Many of the “magicians” openly admit and even boast about working with various spirits and even demons.

This guy...(he's a V2 supporter but I did laugh at a couple of his parody videos.)

https://www.youtube.com/@Deuterocomical/videos

...is supposed to debunk the Dimonds magicians videos (he talks about it in this comment section...)

...under the "You're a fool" comment) and has stated he challenged the Dimonds to a debate on the matter and they have not accepted (or rejected) apparently his e-mail challenge was ignored. 

I'm interested in what he can supposedly debunk but I think Dimonds did a very solid video on these and don't really think they can be debunked on (most or all of) this.  Won't be surprised if he just sets up and attacks strawmen.  I do think one or two of the tricks covered could be explainable by natural means but I have no doubt many of these people are actually sorcerors that made a deal with the devil.

That was a humorous parody video.  I went through the alleged debunking threads on Twitter and found the two examples they gave to be ludicrious, not even coming close to explaining what we saw.  Barring some extreme camera trickery and audiences who were "in on" it, at least 90% of these can't be explained other than through diabolical agency.  On top of that, many (if not most) of the magicians featured in the Dimond video boasted of working with "entities", and some explicitly calling them demons.

Yeah, there will always be the scoffers who just don't want to believe and they say that the sorcerors were "kidding" when they say stuff like working with demons and such.  Basically they will make every excuse to not believe that these people are diabolically influenced or that evil demons exist.  

Good video. It's like debunking Lad's flat earth magic and supposed lying scientists with real physics. Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's fake or false or real magic. It's too easy to be deceived. Look first to rational natural explanations even though you can't think of any.

Most of the video is complete garbage, and the fact that you consider it "good" is a sign of your lack of intellectual capacity, and your lack of any deep supernatural faith.  There's no "magic" to flat earth either, and you have never refuted the flat earth position with any rational argument.  You're nothing but a faithless idiot.

The "Deuterocomical" guy actually did release a video trying to debunk Dimonds magician video.  It's about an hour long.  I haven't seen it yet but am going to give it a view but I'm guessing he attacks some strawmen or only attacks one or two points and claims victory.   

Thank you for posting this. This was fantastic. I watched the majority of it, and yes, he answered the video very well. Just because Michael Dimond doesn't know how a trick is done, doesn't mean it was done by the devil.

It is superstitious to assign a supernatural cause to some event without proof. In the absence of proof of a supernatural causation, one must assume the cause is a natural event, even if one doesn't know what the natural cause is. This is the Catholic way of thinking. If Michael Dimond knew anything about the Catholic faith, he would know that.

So, if something good happens to you, you don't assume it happened because of your lucky rabbit's foot. You assume you just got lucky.